because they have a personal belief that it's harmful or might cause problems for future generations? If they don't cite it as a religious objection, is it still the same as wanting to enact a form of Sharia law?... or is it now acceptable? If this person is known to favour a specific religion, does that change how you feel about their concerns?
You say you are against Sharia law but, if you are making laws based on your religion, you are promoting Sharia Law no matter what you want to call it in your religion.
If you can say I don't want to do this because it's against my religion, don't do it. If you say I don't want you to do it because it's against my religion, it's Sharia Law.
What's to stop Jews and Muslims from saying that I am opposed to port and alcohol, therefore nobody can have these things?
Don't tell me that this is different because it isn't any different that no mixed race marriages or slavery. Those states voted against mixed race marriages and for slavery. Are you saying that, if your state voted against mixed race marriage, your state doesn't have to recognize it? If you voted for separate drinking fountains or white only restaurants, that you could enforce it in your state?
The Civil War showed that Federal Law trumps state laws.

Chowhound
Comic Vine
GameFAQs
GameSpot
Giant Bomb
TechRepublic