Seth is not a fan of TheRUMP

The "Women's March" has excluded a pro-life women's group from their protest rally......I guess if you believe in life, you aren't a woman anymore.

as a 'partner' in the march, but so many complained about the fact that they are pro-life that they were told to leave the partnership. So I guess it's the typical 'lefty' attitude....if you don't believe in their WHOLE agenda, even if you are protesting Trump, you can't come to THEIR party because you are the 'wrong' type of 'feminist'.

what you're talking about and are speculating.....let me inform you.

The "Women's March" advertised that they were all INCLUSIVE.....meaning ALL women were invited to partner with them and march with them. The pro-life group asked about joining them and were given the 'partnership' status and ok'd......it was when it was announced on Twitter that they had another group partnering with them that the s..t hit the fan and complaints rolled in because others didn't want them so they were told to leave the march and partnership completely. Doesn't sound like it was really all INCLUSIVE to me....does it sound that way to you? Radical lefties are only inclusive when you agree with their entire agenda.....they don't want diversity after all. I'm sure you'll find something to babble incoherently about now, so I'll end this part of the conversation here so you're free to have the last word, JP, as you try to defend this crap.

that can be put together out of the population; makes no political sense and likely to be counterproductive at some future time. Now read how many, even on SE [!], are hoping for a dilution of vitriol. Likely?

You don't run toward them. This proves they aren't really afraid of him but just want to have a b.tch session, and make fools of themselves. How many children are missing their mothers during this?

You tell me...

How old are their children?

Are they still living at home?

Where's daddy?

that's what a lot of useless questions from you mostly signals. Constantly.

How many children are missing their mothers during this?

the father won't have anyone to prepare HIS meals while the "little woman" is away?

How many of these women are married? I would love to see the percentages of married to not married on them.

Perhaps these women aren't "usual"...When threatened they go in attack mode...

Again, I wonder how many are married. Not has been married, but currently married.

and I wonder why it makes a difference to you the percentage of married versus unmarried.

it's because they never learned the art of 'compromise'........if they were/are this hateful in their marriages, I can understand why men would leave in droves.

Because of uncompromising women?

What do you know about uncompromising women?

You seem to be very flexible and always willing to listen to the other side of an argument with an open mind.

in my life...However, I see you have decided to try to make this personal and about me, as a typical liberal who has run out of debate material. So I have to ask....considering all of YOUR views here in SE, how many times have YOU compromised in your life, JP?

I have some pretty strong views on certain things, obviously....however, my own posts have shown that some in my family have views close to yours. I don't cut them out of my life because we have different points of view, like many liberals have done especially in this election. We compromise by agreeing to disagree and discuss other things. How many people have YOU cut out of your life this election because you refuse to compromise, JP? Does a liberal even know the meaning of that word?

And I actually DO listen to different points of view when those views are delivered in a rational manner. ( I don't think I've experienced that with you.) Just because I personally reject the majority of those views doesn't mean I haven't heard them.

IF you were really paying attention, you would know that.

Politics isn't taboo in my family......but I've talked to many people who have been 'defriended' on FB, hung up on, and literally told not to contact again because of the high level of 'passion' on, mostly, the liberal side of this election. That's why so many Trump supporters stayed in the background during polls, or not advertising out loud their support. The liberals were/are so angry that, if you've watched any of the news and the videos that went along with that anger, you would know that many were afraid for their safety. My family made the decision to not discuss the election in order to NOT have our relationships escalate to that level. Liberals who agreed with each other talked with each other; conservatives did the same.....we just didn't cross that line when both sides got together at the same time. No election is worth losing family members over. That was the compromise we all made and it's worked out well. Some people just can't help themselves and don't care enough about their loved ones or friends to prioritize those relationships, JP, and it's obvious when you see the rioting that the liberal side is willing to inflict.

I can say or discuss anything I want to with you because you don't count as important in my life.

YES...it is...

A taboo is a vehement prohibition of an action based on the belief that such behavior is either too sacred or too accursed for ordinary individuals to undertake

You would realize the subject of politics IS taboo with your friends and family. You've admitted it in your own words...

My family made the decision to not discuss the election in order to NOT have our relationships escalate to that level...we just didn't cross that line when both sides got together at the same time.

to not discuss = to undertake

The discussion of politics is taboo....

to not discuss = too accursed for ordinary individuals to undertake

NOT

to not discuss = to undertake

If you want to call it taboo, fine. It's actually a compromise among family members because, unlike you, we are not antagonistic people who just have to be 'in your face' all the time, and since you wanted to know when it started, 2008 when BO announced he was running.

When BO was first running, it became pretty clear quickly that the liberals in the family were strongly in favor of him. We had a few debates over visits back and forth during that first year and when it became obvious that we were not going to agree on those policies, we all equally made the decision to compromise and not debate the issues anymore since nobody was going to change their minds any time soon. Tempers didn't actually flare or get out of control until this election, however, and that compromise was put back into place because losing family ties over either of the candidates was worth that to us.

There wasn't the 8 year complaint that you assume took place....I left that for SE and you.

carefully enough to comprehend the words, JP......You stated:

"IF the rest of the family listened to complaints about Obama for 8 years"

and I replied "There wasn't the 8 year complaint that you assume took place" AND that I used SE for those complaints, NOT my family, JP.

IF you're going to ASK a question at the very least, I think you should read the answer in its entirety.

As for the level of 'passion' not unlike a Donkey.....the liberal DEMS are the ones with a stubborn A$$ as its mascot.

is there something wrong with having a "high level of passion"/ being stubborn like a donkey?

RE: I replied "There wasn't the 8 year complaint that you assume took place"

YOU and your friends and family just didn't/couldn't/wouldn't talk politics for 8 years....BUT it wasn't 8 years of complaining...

Just PRETEND there isn't a problem...The "Elephant" in the room?

See how I worked elephant into the conversation?

Because now Trump is President and I know that burns in your craw, LOL!