Speakeasy forum

General discussion

Senate Votes to Allow Arctic Drilling

by Mark5019 / March 16, 2005 3:26 AM PST

WASHINGTON - Amid the backdrop of soaring oil and gasoline prices, a sharply divided Senate on Wednesday voted to open the ecologically rich Alaska wildlife refuge to oil drilling, delivering a major energy policy win for President Bush (news - web sites).


AP Photo



The Senate, by a 51-49 vote, rejected an attempt by Democrats and GOP moderates to remove a refuge drilling provision from next year's budget, preventing opponents from using a filibuster ? a tactic that has blocked repeated past attempts to open the Alaska refuge to oil companies.


The action, assuming Congress agrees on a budget, clears the way for approving drilling in the refuge later this year, drilling supporters said.


The oil industry has sought for more than two decades to get access to what is believed to be billions of barrels of oil beneath the 1.5 million-acre coastal plain of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge in the northern eastern corner of Alaska.


Environmentalists have fought such development and argued that despite improve environmental controls a web of pipelines and drilling platforms would harm calving caribou, polar bears and millions of migratory birds that use the coastal plain.


Bush has called tapping the reserve's oil a critical part of the nation's energy security and a way to reduce America's reliance on imported oil, which account for more than half of the 20 million barrels of crude use daily. The Alaska refuge could supply as much as 1 million barrels day at peak production, drilling supporters said.


"We won't see this oil for 10 years. It will have minimal impact," argued Sen. Maria Cantwell (news, bio, voting record), D-Wash., a co-sponsor of the amendment that would have stripped the arctic refuge provision from the budget document. It is "foolish to say oil development and a wildlife refuge can coexist," she said.


Sen. John Kerry (news - web sites), D-Mass., argued that more oil would be saved if Congress enacted an energy policy focusing on conservation, more efficient cars and trucks and increased reliance on renewable fuels and expanded oil development in the deep-water Gulf where there are significant reserves.


"The fact is (drilling in ANWR) is going to be destructive," said Kerry.


and of course the man with a plan lol
has to have a say lol

http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=512&u=/ap/20050316/ap_on_go_co/arctic_drilling_10&printer=1

Discussion is locked
You are posting a reply to: Senate Votes to Allow Arctic Drilling
The posting of advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks is prohibited. Please refer to our CNET Forums policies for details. All submitted content is subject to our Terms of Use.
Track this discussion and email me when there are updates

If you're asking for technical help, please be sure to include all your system info, including operating system, model number, and any other specifics related to the problem. Also please exercise your best judgment when posting in the forums--revealing personal information such as your e-mail address, telephone number, and address is not recommended.

You are reporting the following post: Senate Votes to Allow Arctic Drilling
This post has been flagged and will be reviewed by our staff. Thank you for helping us maintain CNET's great community.
Sorry, there was a problem flagging this post. Please try again now or at a later time.
If you believe this post is offensive or violates the CNET Forums' Usage policies, you can report it below (this will not automatically remove the post). Once reported, our moderators will be notified and the post will be reviewed.
Collapse -
Well even if it takes ten years
by TONI H / March 16, 2005 3:46 AM PST

(it took nearly that long for the Alaska Pipeline to be up and running), this would blow the theory that we're in Iraq for their oil right out of the water, now doesn't it?

We are damned if we do and we're damned if we don't, but critics have hollered for years about how we're too dependent on foreign oil....

How is Kerry and other opponents going to feel if the wildlife in ANWR will suffer as opposed to having some rig in the gulf spring a leak and kill the waterlife instead? Has he never heard of Exxon and that tanker and all the destruction that happened from a mishap? The risks are there no matter what direction we head.....north or south.....so where's a real plan from them that is risk-free?

TONI

Collapse -
Toni the area set aside
by Mark5019 / March 16, 2005 3:50 AM PST

to explore is small and the inviremetals agreed on it now there back sliding as usual for there kind.

but wait till Kerry stands firm on a plan oh what am i saying he cant takes testicular fortitude to stand up for something

Collapse -
And if they had acted 4 years ago ...
by Evie / March 16, 2005 10:05 PM PST

... we would be six years out! Hoping it finally goes through this time. These NE Senators (Lieberman sadly among them) like to cry and whine about oil prices (cost me a small fortune this winter :() -- their latest brainstorm is to release strategic reserves!! -- but they don't want to do anything practical to improve it.

Evie Happy

Collapse -
If,
by duckman / March 16, 2005 10:12 PM PST

you release stratigic reserves, don't you have to refill and repalce it? (currently at a MUCH higher cost)

Collapse -
And remember
by kmarchal / March 16, 2005 10:20 PM PST

no wind turbines in my back yard over 75 percent of the Alaskans do want this in their back yard.

Collapse -
my 2 bits
by kmarchal / March 16, 2005 4:03 AM PST

first we are talk about;
Drilling pads total 2,000 acres, or less than one-tenth of 1 percent of the refuge.

second
Environmentalists Ignore The FACTS that caribou went from 3,000 to 36,000

Collapse -
(NT) (NT) ARRRRRGH !!!
by Angeline Booher / March 16, 2005 4:24 AM PST
Collapse -
why arg
by Mark5019 / March 16, 2005 4:25 AM PST
In reply to: (NT) ARRRRRGH !!!

the area was agreed on why do we need to wait or not drill?

Popular Forums
icon
Computer Newbies 10,686 discussions
icon
Computer Help 54,365 discussions
icon
Laptops 21,181 discussions
icon
Networking & Wireless 16,313 discussions
icon
Phones 17,137 discussions
icon
Security 31,287 discussions
icon
TVs & Home Theaters 22,101 discussions
icon
Windows 7 8,164 discussions
icon
Windows 10 2,657 discussions

CNET FORUMS TOP DISCUSSION

Help, my PC with Windows 10 won't shut down properly

Since upgrading to Windows 10 my computer won't shut down properly. I use the menu button shutdown and the screen goes blank, but the system does not fully shut down. The only way to get it to shut down is to hold the physical power button down till it shuts down. Any suggestions?