Don't worry, be happy.
Although every one of your items has its point, this same "security" issue has been around since "before" computers. The postal service and snail mail has it's own security issues which is monitored by the government and accessed by thieves. Phone conversations the same way. Verbal conversations were hijacked by gossips before that. (And still are, for that matter.)
So, you either practice Zen, get over it, stop using computers, or move to a mountain top and become a 'prepper'.
Hope this helps.
Grif
What the internet needs is a true distributed network with protocols in place that protect both the sender and the receiver. Nobody should be able to find out who owns a website, let alone who's writing for it. What are words going to do anyway? Bring about a revolution that knocks governments over? maybe. And if, if someone where to voice a threat, the law could act upon that threat by securing said individual or property. This excuse, violence, terrorism, pedophilia and all other horse **** that has been used to infringe upon our rights that needs to stop full period!
Then there's the whole TOR ******** on top of this old system. It is merely security through obfuscation and the second it became popular all governments started hosting nodes to intercept the traffic. Before then I2P was already subverted, there's a FBI / CSS pdf floating around proving so. This opens the door for hardware functional automated time correlation attacks. As such, rendering your obfuscation void. Majority of western governments don't give a **** if u buy some weed or xtc off the internet.
To truly guarantee one's security, safety and privacy on TOR your going to want to be running TOR from a DISC, USB, rasberry based OS, hopping through a virtual whonix bridge, connecting to a (public wifi, botnet, hacked wifi or some planted wifi PPOE to a VPN paid with laundered monero coins and then you'll be pretty secure from state adversaries. To go to this trouble to be anonymous is absolutely ridiculous and it's high time we actually truly take our privacy back.
It's the same **** with the HTTPS nonsense, it's a false sense of security. Certificate authorities are easily coerced, intimidated, blackmailed, hacked or simply spoofed / MITMed in order to get decrypt traffic. Even CA eavesdropping hardware is sold nowadays. A large portion of CA's even refuse to increase their security from 128 to 256, from SHA-1 to SHA-2 which are all insecure. The minimum should all ready be SHA-2 512.
What good is HTTPS anyway when the owner of the website is directly taped into special collection programs. NSA even has a program where it collects people their porn preference. You think they do that because it's so interesting? naah blackmail material.
We've moved the HTTP to the back of the browser just as HTTPS, it's not longer required to be typed and through CSP we can even auto force HTTPS. As such, these insufficient protocols need to be replaced. The current browsing we sublet loads of connections to cdn's and other domains to create static pages, to unload the server of image data etc etc. This sort of functionality is easily created within protocols themselfs. Not only that we could actually create protocols from the ground up that have security from the protocol up, proper containerization etc etc. TCP/IP and UDP are abhorrent crapfests security wise.
Sick off seeing all these companies and movements spam their nonsense with their magic wonder solution, "privacy built in" "extra secure" it's all simply added ******** on top of an outdated and archaic ******** system that needs to revamped from the bottom up. Your still using the same old internet protocols from 30+ years ago. You are not safe and you can never make it safe.
Just like Ladar Levison said:
>i have to build a Abrahams Tank of a protocol just to be relatively secure in sending email.
The internet wasn't encrypted back when it was created because it was illegal to do so, hence the crypto wars, which now started again because FBICUCKS want to mandatory weaken encryption.
Zeronet has altered the naming scheme for the better, but it's still lacking. No more money hungry jews who become intermediaries charging you an arm and a leg for a 1 year registration let alone some ******* **** tier privacy. You can set your .bit name with namecoin which is like less then 1 cent, tbh the money should not be needed thus it is still flawed. The system should use a blockchain technology.
I seriously hope that fat **** Kim Dotcom is going to come with a system with his MEGAnet that hits from the hardware level up rather then being build on top of the current internet protocols.
Opennic isn't going to do **** when the Feds serve gag orders and warrants, documents so long they will need weeks to read it all while having a 5 business days compliance limit or your going to jail for years. When the US government wants something shut down, it gets it shut the **** down. No matter the technologies you employ in the current dysfunctional environment, where there is a will and enough money there is a eventual way.
The entire system is faulty and needs to be replaced. Changing DNS isn't going to do ****. UN isn't going to do **** because true (((diplomacy))) is achieved, nothing will ever change and events in the world will influence their decision making. It's pure retardation. The US currently has a control monopoly and uses that monopoly to seize and shutdown (cc)TLD's as it sees fit. What do u mean free speech? Sure i can insult my neighbor through social media with a shitposter nickname. I can't criticize my government without spooks adding me to lists or worse. The story of John Lang who exposed police brutality and corruption through the internet should set off alarm bells.
The internet should not be owned nor overseen by any organization or government. True freedom, security and privacy for all. No more censorship, nor more blacklisting, no more intimidating, no more lawsuits, no more ********!
The EU has a legislation on the shelves and wants to force upon member states which where it will force a 1 single EU digital market. US and Chinese digital companies will be kicked out of the EU digital market. The introduction of a eID, in order to even get internet you have to give your full name, any login system must use this eID system. More power to large corporations. Reintroduction of the chatting taxation, 0.xx euro per chat msg no matter the application. More webfilters, less privacy, more anti-hate speech. Internal network created by HP which will be a corporate NSA like corporation under the despises of the European Union and it's undemocratically appointed Commission.
But hey, let's just change DNS's, that will fix everything.

Chowhound
Comic Vine
GameFAQs
GameSpot
Giant Bomb
TechRepublic