Storage forum


SATA vs IDE Hard Drive Speed For Backup (External Enclosure)

by Merazomo / September 18, 2012 4:44 PM PDT

Windows 7 64-bit
HP Desktop
3 GB Ram
290 GB Hard Drive

Hello, I'm looking to purchase an internal hard drive for backup purposes only. Somebody mentioned that it was cheaper to buy a used internal hard drive, adapt an external enclosure, and use it as an external hard drive. Taking that into consideration, I would only assume that IDE drives are going for a lot cheaper than SATA drives due to age, speed, and technology right?. Just how big is the difference between IDE, SATA, 7200 rpm, 5400 rpm, for backup purposes only.

Discussion is locked
You are posting a reply to: SATA vs IDE Hard Drive Speed For Backup (External Enclosure)
The posting of advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks is prohibited. Please refer to our CNET Forums policies for details. All submitted content is subject to our Terms of Use.
Track this discussion and email me when there are updates

If you're asking for technical help, please be sure to include all your system info, including operating system, model number, and any other specifics related to the problem. Also please exercise your best judgment when posting in the forums--revealing personal information such as your e-mail address, telephone number, and address is not recommended.

You are reporting the following post: SATA vs IDE Hard Drive Speed For Backup (External Enclosure)
This post has been flagged and will be reviewed by our staff. Thank you for helping us maintain CNET's great community.
Sorry, there was a problem flagging this post. Please try again now or at a later time.
If you believe this post is offensive or violates the CNET Forums' Usage policies, you can report it below (this will not automatically remove the post). Once reported, our moderators will be notified and the post will be reviewed.

All Answers

Collapse -
Re: backup
by Kees_B Forum moderator / September 18, 2012 5:15 PM PDT

Both IDE and SATA are faster than the USB (even USB-3) you use to connect the external to. So it makes no difference.


Collapse -
So ...
by Kees_B Forum moderator / September 18, 2012 6:10 PM PDT
In reply to: Re: backup

an internal hard drive is much faster. But it's less safe as a backup, because:
- you can't store it at another location (to protect against fire, and theft of the PC)
- it's much too easy to delete or files from it by accident
- there is a risk that viruses or power outage or peaks damage or erase the internal hard disk
- it can be infected with malware easier

So maybe you want an internal hard disk for a fast backup, done regularly (a few times a week an incremental backup = only new and changed files) and an external one to use less often.

Your backup strategy is totally your choice.


Collapse -
You can look into...
by Willy / September 18, 2012 11:06 PM PDT

If you buy an ext. case, get one that *maybe* optional for either EIDE or SATA use. While it's still connected to the PC via the USB port, it's usually the way to go. The only other option is use of SATA-e provided you have or install a SATA-e port on your PC. You then need an ext. HD case that offers SATA-e as well. This is faster than plain USB, but generally isn't widely accepted. Your last option if you care to be more open to it, is an ext. adapter setup. These accept various connections and even devices that require those ports. google ADA-2020 or similar adapters that use USB ports. Thus, you get your hands on whatever HD is available.

tada -----Willy Happy

Popular Forums
Computer Help 51,912 discussions
Computer Newbies 10,498 discussions
Laptops 20,411 discussions
Security 30,882 discussions
TVs & Home Theaters 21,253 discussions
Windows 10 1,672 discussions
Phones 16,494 discussions
Windows 7 7,855 discussions
Networking & Wireless 15,504 discussions


Meet the drop-resistant Moto Z2 Force

The Moto Z2 Force is really thin, with a fast processor and great battery life. It can survive drops without shattering.