RULES, for the civilian population

nothing more can i say you said it all shame on you.
i wonder how your realitives feel that served about you.
shame on you

that won't get me deleted!

What would happen if you said that to someone who was a LRRP or who flew in a Slick? You wouldn't get your a$$ kicked,you'd get it beaten bloody senseless!

You can open your mouth if you've paid dues Bro,not too many have!

Tony, veterans are supposed to stand there and take insults and barbs hurled at them. But son a of a gun, they are not playing that game. I think that this confuses some of the people attacking under whatever name(s)that we don't.
Also, we're not supposed to remember things that run counter to some "fact" or line of stuff that they have picked up somewhere on a source with an anti-war, anti-veteran,anti-U.S., anti-political party or anti-whatever agenda.
I guess that we're not as much "fun" anymore. Tough bananas for the attack crowd.

the armed forces or anyone who served. I support the troops. I hate the war, feel it has become a fairly senseless abomination. It is the people here, in country, shouting this nationalistic hooha who I feel are dangerous, starting with the current administration. Blind leading the blind.

My relatives are well aware of my attitudes and we get along fine, as well as friends of mine who have served.

and it was the same in nam the ones that never served or had the $$$ to buy there way into collage made the vietnam turn out the way it did.
so keep on yelling were not behind our troops ,its on your shoulders.

but what you wrote made absolutely no sense. All I can say is I don't feel anything on my shoulders as I stated I DO support the armed forces, just not the ones in charge of them.

rednecks, NASCAR bloats and right wing nuts are called to heed the commander in thief's call to arms of if you are not with us you are gonna get your butt kicked and that includes citizens who dare buck the party line

welcome to the new AmeriKa

and another uninformed person opens yap to talk trash gee-sh bro

besides the First amendment and the right not to get my *** kicked by some flag waving dogmatic uberpatriot.

yes you have the right to mouth off and us "uberpatriots" have the right to show you the error of your ways.

This "Uberpatriot" enjoys the thumbs up,salutes and waves when he goes for a ride.
http://pages.zdnet.com/tonytryke/sitebuildercontent/sitebuilderpictures/02proud.jpg

...as was mentioned, when you hide behind a fake name or a nondescript first name...well, you know the rest.

I deslike people who don't know me "bro" or "brother". In my mind, there was sarcasm when I used the term, but I realize that doesn't translate over the net.

And don't call me boy, or I'll kick your ***.

Well, I'll say that when you hurl an insult like "uberpatriot" with its obvious implication with the "uber" at someone, you feel it wise to do so behind the safety of a name like moosteve.

Definition

You might be advised not to challenge this patriot in this manner or else he may sick forum search on you to prove or hint that you are not a real person and that Steve is not your real name.

for the people. I like it here just fine, thanks.

.

i was not saying he was beting his wife only that for him to suggest that I should move to some country other than my homeland is as bright an idea if someone asked him when he stopped beating his wife

get it?

good

What is your preference and have you stopped?

get it?

good

your PR question does not even deserve this much of my time

considering the foregoing i doubt any question you ask me warrants any of my time

i'm done here

Hi, Ed.

While Darrin's rhetoric is way over the top, your suggestion is even more offensive. America, like this forum, is based on freedom of speech and belief. All too many on the right, including our President, are getting back into the Cold War-era "with us or against us" nonsense, which leads to your "love it or leave it!" NO! It's our country too, and we must work to preserve what's good and unique in America, not let it be taken down the road to the same sort of monolitihic totalitarianism on the right that you're implying Darrin wants on the left.

Your post is another perfect example of Newt's manual in action -- equate those on the left with Communists and traitors. Well, we're not -- we're standing up for the same principles that Jefferson, Franklin, et al. set forth in the great documents associated with our nation's founding!

-- Dave K, Speakeasy Moderator
click here to email semods4@yahoo.com

The opinions expressed above are my own,
and do not necessarily reflect those of CNET!

......

Yeap a lot of them lately.

From left and right.

And maybe some from me, so be it. I don't object to protestors and disagreement, I object to disrespect on both sides.

And there seems plenty to go around. So much in fact that everyone is throwing eggs and not stopping to wipe egg off their face.

RogerNC

click here to email semods4@yahoo.com

Dave I'd could have accepted and passed without comment your post if had stopped at end of first paragraph.

But your fixation on the demonizing of a "Newt manual" is just as offensive as anything you're complaining about.

You repeatedly use the "Newt manual" refrain to tar Republicans and conservatives as willing to slander and crucify anyone that has a different view.

As someone somewhere in the middle of the two extremes, it's hard not to say a pox on both of your houses and either attack or ignore all.

RogerNC

click here to email semods4@yahoo.com