Speakeasy forum

General discussion

Romney: 27 whoppers in 38 minutes

by Josh K / October 4, 2012 5:44 AM PDT
Discussion is locked
You are posting a reply to: Romney: 27 whoppers in 38 minutes
The posting of advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks is prohibited. Please refer to our CNET Forums policies for details. All submitted content is subject to our Terms of Use.
Track this discussion and email me when there are updates

If you're asking for technical help, please be sure to include all your system info, including operating system, model number, and any other specifics related to the problem. Also please exercise your best judgment when posting in the forums--revealing personal information such as your e-mail address, telephone number, and address is not recommended.

You are reporting the following post: Romney: 27 whoppers in 38 minutes
This post has been flagged and will be reviewed by our staff. Thank you for helping us maintain CNET's great community.
Sorry, there was a problem flagging this post. Please try again now or at a later time.
If you believe this post is offensive or violates the CNET Forums' Usage policies, you can report it below (this will not automatically remove the post). Once reported, our moderators will be notified and the post will be reviewed.
Collapse -
Others say different
by James Denison / October 4, 2012 6:20 AM PDT

other reliable sources claim that Obama had 4 more minutes in the debate than Romney. If ThinkProgress can mess up on a simple time clock check, how can we trust any of their other assertions?

Collapse -
James, I only trust you...
by grimgraphix / October 4, 2012 6:24 AM PDT
In reply to: Others say different

... So, please get back to us after you sit down with a stop watch and time the two candidates time on air.

Remember.... I'm depending on you and only you.


Collapse -
if I may, here is a BBC fact checking article
by grimgraphix / October 4, 2012 6:21 AM PDT
Collapse -
(NT) Did they tell you that BO had 33 in 42 minutes?
by TONI H / October 4, 2012 8:56 AM PDT
Collapse -
by lylesg / October 4, 2012 9:46 AM PDT
Collapse -
I notice that neither of you have provided a link to...
by grimgraphix / October 4, 2012 3:42 PM PDT
In reply to: LOL

... the 33 fact problems that Toni says Obama had.

Collapse -
from your link, I count 7 Obama gaffes.
by grimgraphix / October 6, 2012 12:16 PM PDT
In reply to: Here's a complete list

That is a far cry from the 33 you were trumpeting.

Collapse -
just because
by Glenda. / October 7, 2012 6:18 AM PDT

you believe what BO said doesn't make Toni wrong!

Collapse -
Where on this thread did I say I believed Obama?
by grimgraphix / October 7, 2012 10:13 AM PDT
In reply to: just because

Where did I say Toni was wrong?

All I have done on this thread is provide links and questioned other people's assertions. Did I make Toni say Obama told 33 whoppers in 42 minutes? Am I wrong to ask people to take personal responsibility for the things they say?

Collapse -
what you said
by Glenda. / October 7, 2012 12:25 PM PDT

was, "That is a far cry from the 33 you were trumpeting" To anyone else that means you are saying Toni was wrong. She also supplied a link from BOTH sides of the debate, did you read it? Yes Grim I would love to see all of SE take responsiblity for what they say, So why don't you start it? All I have seen is all of you making excuses for BO's poor debating.

Collapse -
RE: To anyone else that means you are saying Toni was wrong.
by JP Bill / October 7, 2012 1:38 PM PDT
In reply to: what you said

Not to me...it just means that Toni provided the wrong link...I know Toni will correct her error and provide a link showing Obama told 33 whoppers.

Collapse -
And I couldn't find 28 whoppers for Romney either
by TONI H / October 7, 2012 9:34 PM PDT

So we meet in the middle with PolitiFact's info.......both were guilty of exaggerations or fabrications; however, because Romney came out with what he considered to be facts and BO mainly stood there closed-mouthed and tried to play it safe, Romney got 'fact checked' more often. Romney won the debate.....and I would guess that the next debate where they are in a townhall element, it will be harder for both of them to carry the 'stage' for long.


I hope this link, since it is 'generic' for their home page, will still show the list of the 'sorting out' of the debate.

Collapse -
Admitted screw up....I thought
by TONI H / October 7, 2012 9:57 PM PDT
In reply to: You did good Toni

I was replying to Glenda.........sorry. I'll be more careful from now on.

Collapse -
7 is a far cry from 33
by grimgraphix / October 8, 2012 12:26 AM PDT
In reply to: what you said

Quit making excuses and quit being bellicose. I made no comment based on hyperbole. I stuck strictly to the facts as they were presented to us. You would not stay quiet if I made a mistake. hy should I stay quiet when other people make outrageous exaggerations?

A huge difference between you and I is that you are decidedly partisan to the point where you start to make things up. You accuse me of making excuses for Obama's poor showing in the recent debate when the truth is that I have made no comment about the debate, other than to point out that Toni was numerically wrong.

Collapse -
Actually, I was numerically wrong
by TONI H / October 8, 2012 1:55 AM PDT
In reply to: 7 is a far cry from 33

but so was Josh. I got my 33 number from a news tv commentator when I posted that but never could find where HE got HIS numbers from. I suspect the same thing that happened with HIS numbers is the same thing that happened with the 27 number Josh got because commentators were counting repeated statements as individual statements. So both sides got their numbers elevated beyond reality. In any event, both sides were misstating some things, and some things they got right.

Collapse -
It really should have been 28
by Josh K / October 4, 2012 11:53 PM PDT

The list I posted didn't include Romney's claim that Obama has doubled the deficit. The deficit is currently down from last year and is projected to drop below $1 trillion in 2013, and --- based on CURRENT POLICY AND SPENDING will drop to around $500 billion by 2015. That means that if Romney got elected and didn't change a thing, he'd be able to run in 2016 and brag that he cut the deficit considerably.


Collapse -
with Obama
by James Denison / October 5, 2012 1:43 AM PDT

economic salvation is always somewhere in the future. It's like that imaginary horizon you keep traveling toward but never reaching.

Collapse -
The fiscal cliff
by crowsfoot / October 5, 2012 7:59 PM PDT
In reply to: with Obama

is a diliberate, on purpose, Republican thing. It's Starve The Beast.

Is it not at least worth doing, to tax the ultra well off at least a little bit? At least as much as labor? As though there was a war going on?

"You didn't build that" is not just a bumper-sticker, knee-jerk. We used to be in this together Not so much anymore. The free money people don't want to pay.

Inheiritance is money "coming in". IE, income. Same as capital gains. It's BS to call it double taxed money. If you're paying taxes on your principal, you're doing it wrong.

What happened to "Created equal"? That IS what motivates people to the military.

Collapse -
You said we used to be in this together
by Steven Haninger / October 5, 2012 8:14 PM PDT
In reply to: The fiscal cliff

This should mean a government that creates partnerships with business rather than calling it an enemy of the people. Whether you have issues with Wall Street or not, you don't call people there "fat cats" and expect them to come over to your side. You don't set people against each other based on income, race, immigration status, personal opinion, gender...etc...you name it. All are equal and none get special attention or treatment. If you want people to work together, you don't carve them into smaller groups and call some friends and some enemies.

Collapse -
Social Security is
by crowsfoot / October 5, 2012 8:32 PM PDT

a manditory annuity. Medicare is a manditory health insurance policy. Without these we would go back to the hero worship of bank robbers and bootlegers.

How is inheiritance and Capital Gains not income? Why does free money not pay the same as labor money? This makes no sense.

Collapse -
Free money
by Steven Haninger / October 5, 2012 8:47 PM PDT
In reply to: Social Security is

So you give a couple bucks to a fellow at the end of the freeway ramp holding a cardboard sign. How much should he pay in taxes on that free money?

Collapse -
(NT) As much as the Church when they get a donation?
by JP Bill / October 5, 2012 9:28 PM PDT
In reply to: Free money
Collapse -
Good. Then the homeless
by Steven Haninger / October 6, 2012 2:01 AM PDT

can cook for and staff the soup kitchens rather than the churches. We'll need to make sure the menus are Michelle approved for proper balance and calorie count.

Collapse -
Same as
by crowsfoot / October 5, 2012 9:38 PM PDT
In reply to: Free money


Collapse -
I agree.
by crowsfoot / October 5, 2012 9:37 PM PDT

You don't carve people into smaller groups. It's not people I see differently. It's the two types of money.

At the very least, if you invest in a company that makes explosivly flamible baby pajamas, whether you knew it or not going in, should you keep your profits up to the point where publicity drives your stock price down to zero?

Not all companies are enimies. But some are.

Your "set people against each other based on income..." etc. is, IMO bogus. The divide is free money vs. labor money.

It's not me doing the divide and conquer thing.

BTW, I do think there's something to the 47% thing. I balieve everybody should pay something into the general fund.

Collapse -
I can't explain it here...perhaps a new thread
by Steven Haninger / October 5, 2012 10:35 PM PDT
In reply to: I agree.

One needs to understand the concepts and differences between "ownership" and "stewardship". Paying taxes is, IMO, more for paying fees for services. We don't truly share by doing that. Paying taxes requires no thinking about what we are doing and allows us to wash our hands of what happens with what we are required to share. Good and proper stewardship requires a great amount of thought and comes with a great amount of responsibility for that which we are requested to share. There is no good substitute for stewardship.

Collapse -
Our economy is not competitive,,,
by crowsfoot / October 7, 2012 2:26 AM PDT

,,, NOT because we tax the rich too much. Rather! It's not competive because we don't accept cardboard shantytowns all over the place. Where if you don't steepen the pitch of the trench that runs down the middle of the pathway in front of your shelter that serves as a sewer, you end up with the logical consequences. You will do what ever it takes to push it on down to the next guy. Right?

Do we really want to go that far down. Maybe I'm wrong. Maybe I just don't have enough preachers or ammunition or walls and gates. Or hired guards, to see the truth. Maybe the two Americas's blinds me.

Does anybody really believe that we can keep adding a billion more people to the world's population every 15 years, indefinitely? And in the mean time, absolutely DO NOT TAX THE RICH!


Our tax code is so screwed up with deductions, that we can't see the forest for the trees. Romney says we're borrowing Big Bird from the Chinese. Okay by me. Drop that. Drop almost everything in Mathew Lesco's Big Book of "Free Gubberment Money".

The thing is that we have reached this ballance through (supposedly) bi-partizan compromise. And everything SOUNDS ridiculous. ludicrous, laughable and absurd.


The "Earned Income Tax Credit" is a subsidy for other peoples kids. But it's hidden. Let's bring all these credits and deductions and shelters, out into the light. If we don't, we continue the deception.

It's really hard to be optimistic. I was raised to "leave the campsite better than I found it". The new Republicans have turned that on it's head. "The worse, the better"!!!


We, as Americans, are supposed to believe in investment. Risk. We are duel moneys type people. We make money by labor. And we "make" money by risk. The deal is that if the workers always absorbe the furthest down side of risk, then it's just a free money thing.

Who's going to pay the interest on our debt? And who's going to collect it?

Who didn't pay in in the first place?


At least let us collect cardboard and do what we can with it. And quit your B****ing.

Popular Forums
Computer Newbies 10,686 discussions
Computer Help 54,365 discussions
Laptops 21,181 discussions
Networking & Wireless 16,313 discussions
Phones 17,137 discussions
Security 31,287 discussions
TVs & Home Theaters 22,101 discussions
Windows 7 8,164 discussions
Windows 10 2,657 discussions


Help, my PC with Windows 10 won't shut down properly

Since upgrading to Windows 10 my computer won't shut down properly. I use the menu button shutdown and the screen goes blank, but the system does not fully shut down. The only way to get it to shut down is to hold the physical power button down till it shuts down. Any suggestions?