Thank you for being a valued part of the CNET community. As of December 1, 2020, the forums are in read-only format. In early 2021, CNET Forums will no longer be available. We are grateful for the participation and advice you have provided to one another over the years.

Thanks,

CNET Support

General discussion

Rollback vs Disk Image backup

Apr 2, 2008 6:14AM PDT

I am currently using Acronis True Image 10 which makes complete disk image backups. I'm very happy with it as it has helped me restore my computer after some pretty messy foul-ups. On another computer I am using Symantec Go Back which allows me to roll back the computer to a previous time. This also has been very usefull.

I like both types of programs and was wondering if it is possible to use both at the same time on a computer. If these two are incompatible, then are there any combinations of roll-back/disk-image programs available?

Discussion is locked

- Collapse -
Well...
Apr 2, 2008 11:02AM PDT

I don't believe there are any compatibility issues if you rely on the base functionality of cloning your hard drive. However, Acronis Startup Recovery Manager may not function properly...may be best not to enable it.

John

- Collapse -
Acronis Tech Support
Apr 3, 2008 6:08AM PDT

I was in touch with Acronis tech support and they said the following:

"Norton Go Back modifies the type of existing partitions (FAT16, FAT32, NTFS, etc.) into its own format, making them incompatible with the existing partitioning/imaging software while Go Back is active. This way Norton Go Back prohibits other applications from changing the partition table. To have Acronis True Image functional to its full extent you will need to disable Norton Go Back first. There is a known issue with Norton Go Back."

You seem to be knowledgeable regarding these programs and I was wondering what you make of this.

Thanks

- Collapse -
I ran into the same problem several years back...
Apr 3, 2008 10:58AM PDT

the saving grace is XP and Vista have built in roll back/go back or whatever it's called. However in the event of a major disk corruption that cannot be fixed by 'go back' or a mechanical disk failure .. the only saving grace is to have a disk image that you can restore.

VAPCMD

- Collapse -
Hmmm...
Apr 5, 2008 2:35AM PDT

GoBack doesn't actually "modify existing partitions into its own format." Rather, it replaces the MBR and partition table. Also, it is possible to change the partition table, just not within Windows while GoBack is enabled. Thus, I don't entirely agree with their response. However, as they said, TrueImage would not function to its full potential. (ie Acronis Startup Recovery Manager) As to the base functionality of simply cloning a partition, from what I know of both applications I believe it would still work, at the very least using the bootable TrueImage CD, though I have not tried it myself.

John


P.S. If choosing between TrueImage and GoBack, using the incremental/differential update feature of TrueImage will get the job done and is far less prone to malfunctions and incompatibilities than GoBack.

- Collapse -
Thank You, John
Apr 6, 2008 3:37AM PDT

Thank you John, I appreciate your input. I am going to follow your advice to use True Image. It does take a little longer to use than GoBack but this is a small price to pay for the assurance of knowing that it will be functional when needed! It would have been nice to be able to use both programs simultaneously, but since I am not overly computer knowledgeable, (I'm no dummy but certainly don't have your expertise) I want to avoid any complications when a major problem requires a restore.

Thank you again.

Herb

- Collapse -
depends
Apr 2, 2008 5:28PM PDT

i.e. You could use True Image for backups and system restore to roll back your computer.
Oor Could use Go Back and win built- in backup feature.

It depends whether windows (i believe, you are runnin on) itself can
manage/meet your needs or no.

However, i'd not use them both one the same machine (different, the
competing companies)...