also become a 'cohort' in your opinion? Should Feinstein's DRIVER of 25 years also be investigated and/or go to jail because he was on HER payroll and turned out to be a Chinese spy/plant?
YOU call them 'cohorts'.....I call them TARGETS by a corrupt BO administration to spy on a political opponent in order to effect the outcome of a Presidential election and bring about the results they wanted....a HILL win.
Cohen went to jail based on HIS illegal activities that had nothing to do with Trump....and couldn't get that plea deal without a FORCED 'confession' of Campaign Finance Laws. That NEVER resulted in TRUMP being accused of the same crime. It was inserted at the end of his 'cooperation' with the Feds for the SOLE purpose of bad publicity for Trump....even CONGRESS who is working hard to GET Trump has never brought it up even though OTHERS in the past have been charged with breaking those laws.....even AOC has been accused with no results.
You keep trying to make some point, but keep forgetting that NONE of these people have gone to jail over ANYTHING to do with Trump, and SOME haven't gone to jail at ALL. And ALL were sucked/suckered in by FBI/Mueller interrogators with threats, which is why they are being appealed.
Do you think you'll be able to defend any of BO's people or HILL's people when the IG and other reports come out and people start getting actual indictments? The 'crimes' you talk about regarding FOUR people (cohorts) involved even slightly with Trump will be NOTHING compared to what's coming soon for the BO administration.
Harp all you want over four people, even though others who have been harassed as well have not been charged with anything. Those people were literally harassed until they lost all their money and all for no reason other than a corrupt FBI COULD. And now you have a House doing exactly the same thing....bring people back to testify when they already DID....and force them all into hiring MORE attorneys knowing most can't afford it.
Did you know that in our country you can bring charges against someone for 'lying' to law enforcement (especially the FBI and Congress) if ONE OTHER person's testimony is different from YOURS and YOU are the actual target? Did you know that Strzok and another FBI agent who interviewed Flynn BOTH said he didn't lie to them, but that Mueller's henchman, with a proven record of having his court cases reversed because he hid exculpatory evidence, Weisman said Flynn lied so they made a decision to destroy him just to get to Trump?
They even told him he could walk free if he would LIE for them and he refused to do that. OTHER people Mueller had 'interviewed' were threatened with the same thing, and most were never charged with anything but went broke paying attorneys to keep fighting them.