We see, all too often, pleas for help in these forums where a user has used this or that Registry Cleaner, or Optimizer, and removed or changed something critical to the system. Next time they boot up, the boot process fails, or there is some other major harm done.
It's sad, because from Windows XP onwards the registry has needed little help, and it manages itself quite nicely. It is a database, so any unused registry entries just stay, 'unused'. It takes up little space, and defragging the registry is not required. Removing unused entries does not increase performance.
Hard Disk defraggers may be different, (if that is what you mean by defraggers). There is often talk that the Windows defragmentation tool could be better, and that there are other, better tools available. But even there, I have never used anything other than Windows' own defragmemter, and my systems run smoothly. I don't even run the defragmenter that often.
I hope that's plain enough? ![]()
Mark
Without any BS, can anyone say whether the myriad Registry Cleaners/Optimizers/Defraggers are worth more than spit? (I have tried freebies and several purchased versions. I think they all make stuff up so you will think you are getting something of value.)
Forthrightness will be appreciated.
Thanks,
Vince

Chowhound
Comic Vine
GameFAQs
GameSpot
Giant Bomb
TechRepublic