How To forum

General discussion

Recommendations on hard drive backups

My hobby club has a RAID drive array that is network connected to the one PC that is used by the club to house an archive of our scanned photgraphs and documents. I am looking for recommendations on how to be back up the drives as they are today. I would also like recommendations on how to better configure the connection of the archive database on hard drives. (I suspect using the current network set-up is not the most effective).

Discussion is locked
You are posting a reply to: Recommendations on hard drive backups
The posting of advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks is prohibited. Please refer to our CNET Forums policies for details. All submitted content is subject to our Terms of Use.
Track this discussion and email me when there are updates

If you're asking for technical help, please be sure to include all your system info, including operating system, model number, and any other specifics related to the problem. Also please exercise your best judgment when posting in the forums--revealing personal information such as your e-mail address, telephone number, and address is not recommended.

You are reporting the following post: Recommendations on hard drive backups
This post has been flagged and will be reviewed by our staff. Thank you for helping us maintain CNET's great community.
Sorry, there was a problem flagging this post. Please try again now or at a later time.
If you believe this post is offensive or violates the CNET Forums' Usage policies, you can report it below (this will not automatically remove the post). Once reported, our moderators will be notified and the post will be reviewed.
Collapse -
It's all about the size of the archive.

In reply to: Recommendations on hard drive backups

Now that 2TB USB HDDs are all over, for cheap, will that do? You can start the backup (your choice how, there is rarely a wrong choice but beware those that want the best (it's a trap) solution.)

As to the connection of the hard drives YOU NEVER TOUCH THAT UNTIL you have backup copies.

As to the network, it works so you don't touch until all is on backups (plural.)

Collapse -
Size Does Matter - So does access to files....

In reply to: It's all about the size of the archive.

Thanks for the reminders - Don't change anything until the backups are done!! I believe the last time I was looking the database for files was about 2 TB and the RAID array can handle at least 4TB, so we are good for a while on the projects to scan in the documents and photos.

We also do have two 2TB hard drives (WD ones) which were bought hastily to "do something" before the group started looking for someone to think the process through (me, long-time IT software project manager) and recommend a "best solution". Short term I am proposing setting up the stand along two 2 TB backup drives on a USB Hub (3.0) and connect that to the PC. Then set up a batch job to copy the files on the RAID array on to the backup drives and just let it run without any more scanning being done until it is finished.

Alternate scheme is put the two backup drives on a network hub (assuming they can be connected that way - needs to be confirmed) and perform the backup the same way.

PC is an HP all-in-one (I don't have the model number) and I think will end up being the bottleneck to this process. Hopefully it doesn't go up in flames from all the heat generated! We really do need to upgrade to a more robust device to act as a server and a gateway for access to the archives over the web - but that's another project for another day...

So for now, manual backup process and then build the "elegant" solution. Thanks for the tips and reminders to back up first before you do anything else.

Collapse -
I wonder about the bottleneck.

In reply to: Size Does Matter - So does access to files....

We used a single 60MHz Pentium One to drive our office network decades ago. It didn't seem to the bottleneck. There's the old where you can increase parts of the machine but that doesn't increase throughput.

That is, the network speed is far lower than what the "server" can deliver so it rarely matters what that server is.

Due to changes at the office I'm just about to setup an Intel NUC with a dual or quad core Celeron to be a GIT server. It really is all about how much the network and such connection speeds are and not as much about the horsepower of the machine today.

Collapse -

In reply to: Recommendations on hard drive backups

Popular Forums

Computer Newbies 10,686 discussions
Computer Help 54,365 discussions
Laptops 21,181 discussions
Networking & Wireless 16,313 discussions
Phones 17,137 discussions
Security 31,287 discussions
TVs & Home Theaters 22,101 discussions
Windows 7 8,164 discussions
Windows 10 2,657 discussions


This one tip will help you sleep better tonight

A few seconds are all you need to get a better night's rest.