aftermath of Katrina was going to come from? I said it years ago, you can't cut taxes and run a war in two separate countries while trying to protect yourself from lunatics armed potentially with weapons from Pakistan or the former Soviet empire without it actually costing money? Unless you want the US economy to tank entirely. How long is China going to continue funding the US National Debt? How long is the US going to live like a credit card junkie spend-spend-spending itself into third world status.
It used to be that Republicans believed in fiscal responsibility, in the ability of the government to pay its way from revenues received. Deficits were anathema. Now apparently all of that has changed and the only thing deemed anathema is taxation, neither on individuals nor for corporations. I don't know of a country in the world that has ever had that system in the last 200 years. There have always been import duties (a tax), luxury taxes, or fees for services from the government or other institutions that offered what are now government services.
To repeat my mantra here: No other industrialized country tries to maintain the fictions that the Right and the current US government maintains, that you can run a nation of 300 million without any visible means of support. No taxes, No duties, nothing at all. To attempt to roll back the fiscal and governmental clock to 1776, or 1800 or whatever is tantamount to adopting the philosophy of Pol Pot: Progress is evil, Cities are cesspits of modernism, only the peasants (farmers and rural folk) are to be trusted, eliminate the educated, the adults, and the city dwellers and build a new society from scratch, free of the contamination of the 20th Century. Say hello to the Americans Rouge.
Does this mean we will see Sendero Luminoso Nuevo (The New Shining Path) guerillas in the streets, fighting for a more primitive society in America, or is it to be a country run by the agenda of the Business community that you desire. 99% ruled by the 1%, a true oligarchy, where individuals count only in their relation to their employers.
Perhaps Kidpeat was being accurate when he objected to my calling the United States a Democracy rather than a Republic. Perhaps what we have been seeing from so many Republicans is the desire to eliminate democracy from the process, to diminish or eliminate the influence of the people from the running of the country so that it can be ordered for "those who know best". The businessmen, the CEO's of corporations without oversight, without regulation.
In case you didn't notice in your devotional reading of Adam Smith, he never once mentions the impact of change or industrialization or mechanization on the work force, and the need to ensure safety. He also didn't mention corruption. In fact his brilliant essay published in 1776 was solely devoted to his discovery of the concept of "the Invisible Hand" or his personal variation on "The Law of Unintended Consequences", an enormously valuable concept, but not one that can be maintained in isolation from the craftiness and criminality that is part of the human condition.
That's what government is supposed to do, to oversee and regulate forces and institutions which exist external to the process of Democracy, to pass laws for the benefit of the majority (i.e. working people) and the minority (i.e. those without a voice, ethnic and religious minorities indeed minorities of all kinds, but not big business which has its own paid voices, many of the Congressmen), to maintain law and order even when it is the little guy against the powerful or the corporate. If the Founding Fathers objected to being run by Britain, think how they'd object to being run by the unelected of Halliburton, of the drug conglomerates, of the Health Management Organizations, of the institutionalization of the powerful over the powerless, the subjugation and marginalization of "The Moved and the Shaken", and particularly of the de-industrialization of the United States for the benefit of shareholders who constitute less than 25% of the American people.
Hmm. Nice polemic, think I'll keep it.
Whoa boy. Hope the ink didn't dry up in Bush's veto pen