No, the original topic is acceptance or rejection of sexual deviancy.
critical of San Francisco, California and Mass. Urges Congress to immediately pass an amendment to the constitution concerning marriage between man and woman.
Bout time.
![]() | Thank you for being a valued part of the CNET community. As of December 1, 2020, the forums are in read-only format. In early 2021, CNET Forums will no longer be available. We are grateful for the participation and advice you have provided to one another over the years. Thanks, CNET Support |
critical of San Francisco, California and Mass. Urges Congress to immediately pass an amendment to the constitution concerning marriage between man and woman.
Bout time.
Discussion is locked
No, the original topic is acceptance or rejection of sexual deviancy.
Hi, Ed.
>>the original topic is acceptance or rejection of sexual deviancy.<<
No, the issue is accepting the love between two people -- calling it "Sexual deviancy" is you trying to impose your own views on others once again. As a society we've finally reached the point that we realize that the state and society have no right to dictate to those two people precisely how that love is expressed.
You know, I actually owe "Justice" Scalia an apology, because I thought he was exaggerating when he predicted that this would be the result of the decision in the Texas sodomy case. He wasn't right (and certainly not just) in his dissent -- but he was more prescient than I in foreseeing the long-term effects of the ruling.
-- Dave K, Speakeasy Moderator
click here to email semods4@yahoo.com
The opinions expressed above are my own,
and do not necessarily reflect those of CNET!
mostly for political gain.
Why does NAMBLA come up in discussions of homosexuals? READ the NAMBLA agenda and you will see if you but open your eyes.
What about straight couples who like to dress up as bunnies and have sex, or are into bondage, or want to wear diapers, weird stuff like that?
fantacy and play acting are a far cry from deviancy such as anal sex or beastiality or rape.
Not even comparable Josh, not even close.
I believe that also is wrong. In the Septuagint version of the OT, passages that in Masoretic that forbid sex during woman's "time of uncleaness" are given as forbidding of sex with a woman in the "place of her uncleaness" which actually covers both anal intercourse and probably during menstrual cycles. Anal sex has the same destructive capabilities through disease pathways for women as for men. One could argue that anal sex with a woman is a hidden homosexual desire.
OK, so let's take that thought to the next logical step. Ed seems to be basing his opposition to gay marriage on the fact that homosexuals engage in "deviant" sexual behavior. So should heterosexuals who engage in the same "deviant" sexual behavior be allowed to marry?
Bringing children into to the argument and waving child molestation relationships is blowing smoke, fogging the issue and trying use emotion over protecting children to cloud the issue.
It is an arbitrary age set by law.
For some purposes at the present time that age is either 16, 14, 18, 21 or in some locations 12.
This law determining the age of consent has changed several times over the years and can be expected to do so in the future.
Consenting adults is a frame of mind Rick. Once4 homosexuality is accepted as "the norm" the camel's nose is pretty far up under the tent.
....people on the far right object to consenting adults doing to each other what their party leaders are trying to do to the country?![]()
What do you mean trying, Josh? Have you looked at the deficits and job numbers lately? BTW, consumer confidence took another big hit last month, based mainly on the dismal jobs growth outlook.
-- Dave K.
Speakeasy Moderator
click here to email semods4@yahoo.com
The opinions expressed above are my own,
and do not necessarily reflect those of CNET!
.
Other names, as you said, are more appropriate.
are trying to save each other from the taxes and rule and social schemes of Democrits as the Conservative party leaders are doing.
Although it is out in the open and easily visible to all, it takes a pretty shrewd democrat to actually see it themselves so I feel I must congratulate you.
Reported in modalert, as is appropriate. You are over the line with this.
Endowed by their creator? On what do you base that. Heavy abuse in heterosexual marriage? On what do you base that? etc. It's easy to throw charges around.
as you can't seem to understand the threat to children that "legitimizing" a perversion holds.
The record on sexual molestation of children speak pretty clearly when a tiny portion of the molestors are hetero while the majority are homosexual predators from a small percentage of the overall population.
Your failure to admit that as a proponent of homosexuality you are also a proponent for NAMBLA's agenda and since you can't see it by yourself or won't admit it to yourself, it is you who should be seeking help. ASAP.
Hello Ed,
*The record on sexual molestation of children speak pretty clearly when a tiny portion of the molestors are hetero while the majority are homosexual predators from a small percentage of the overall population*
While not disputing this statement I would like to see the statistics it is derived from. I was under the impression that a large majority of molestation was perpetrated by family members including mothers and fathers.
It has been shown several times that a greatly disproportionate percentage of sexual abusers of children come from the small percentage of the population that is homosexual.
Under the age of 12 it is a pedophile who attacks them but over the age of 12 it becomes a homosexual act. This is used to "blur" the focus.
Here is one link http://traditionalvalues.org/urban/one.php and a Google search using "pedophile" with "homosexual" will get you a few thousand more.
Homosexuals account for only 1-2% of our population based on current surveys. The National Opinion Research Center in 1992 found that 2.8% of men and 1.4% of women identified themselves as ?homosexual? or ?bisexual. A 1995 survey of 18-49-year-old men published by the Journal of Sex Research indicated that 2.6% of them had engaged in homosexual sex within the prior 12 months; 4% had had homosexual sex within the past five years. In other words, at least 98-99% of our population is heterosexual in orientation.
Homosexual activists routinely claim that most child molesters are ?heterosexual? males, thus shifting the focus away from their own very high rates of molestation. Since 98-99% of the population is heterosexual, it is technically correct to say that most molestations are done by heterosexuals. However, statistics indicate that homosexuals pose a far more serious threat to children than do heterosexuals.
...He studied 199 cases. ...He also discovered that 59 homosexual male teachers had molested boys and four female homosexual teachers had molested girls. In other words, 32 percent of those child molestation cases involved homosexuals. Nearly a third of these cases come from only 1-2% of the population.
Hi, Patrick.
Please don't take that link at face value -- odds are that the "study" is highly biased, starting from the conclusion and working backwords to prove it.
-- Dave K, Speakeasy Moderator
click here to email semods4@yahoo.com
The opinions expressed above are my own,
and do not necessarily reflect those of CNET!
you are showing your bigotry again.
Hi, Ed.
"traditionalvalues.org" -- now THERE's a site that doubtless presents rigorously peer-reviewed unbiased statistical analyses of scientific studies. Yeah, right!
-- Dave K, Speakeasy Moderator
click here to email semods4@yahoo.com
The opinions expressed above are my own,
and do not necessarily reflect those of CNET!
you didn't bother actually reading the info at the link OR looking at the sources cited before allowing your knees to start spasming.
The more you post lately the less I believe you have EVER done any actual research on ANYTHING!
Rather than not reading and simply providing your personal and bigoted response, why don't you offer up some kind of EVIDENCE that the figures are not accurate? Good luck doing so, but you will NOT have any success.