General discussion

poor performance with Dell Studio D540

I just bought a Dell Studio D540 (Intel Core 2 quad processor Q9400 2.66 GHz, 8 GB RAM, 64 bit Vista) specifically to speed up the data analysis that I'm doing with Matlab. The program I wrote involves a lot of Fourier transforms etc, it takes about an hour to run on my PC at home, an HP s3500f (AMD Athlon dual core 5400 2.8 Ghz, 6 GB RAM, 64 bit Vista), but over 2 hours on my Dell Studio.
According to the benchmarks on the cnet reviews the Dell should be faster than the HP or at least comparable, it should definitely not take twice as long. There has to be something seriously wrong with this system. As a comparison, the program takes about 1 hour 50 mins to run on an old 2.8 GHz Pentium 4 in the lab.
I've tried to get help from Dell but they said it was a software problem & it's not covered by the warranty.
Any ideas for why I'm getting this truly abysmal performance would be greatly appreciated.

Discussion is locked
Reply to: poor performance with Dell Studio D540
PLEASE NOTE: Do not post advertisements, offensive materials, profanity, or personal attacks. Please remember to be considerate of other members. If you are new to the CNET Forums, please read our CNET Forums FAQ. All submitted content is subject to our Terms of Use.
Reporting: poor performance with Dell Studio D540
This post has been flagged and will be reviewed by our staff. Thank you for helping us maintain CNET's great community.
Sorry, there was a problem flagging this post. Please try again now or at a later time.
If you believe this post is offensive or violates the CNET Forums' Usage policies, you can report it below (this will not automatically remove the post). Once reported, our moderators will be notified and the post will be reviewed.
- Collapse -
Compare the OS.

Do you remember the old "Windows Thunking" discussions? You may want to ask for both Vista 32 and XP Pro (32 bit.)

- Collapse -
same OS on HP seems fine

My HP system also has 64 bit Vista. The Matlab program takes about an hour on this system, which seems reasonable, there's a lot of math.
The cnet benchmark specs gave these 2 systems comparable performance, although the Dell should be faster, all tests were done with 64 bit Vista (if I remember correctly).
The main difference between the HP & the Dell is the processor, but that shouldn't lead to such a vast difference in performance (1 hr on the HP vs 2 hrs on the Dell), should it?

- Collapse -
Compare benchmarks.

You may be right. Look up CPUZ to poke around and see not only the CPU speed but memory timings.

One poor guy had a lightning fast CPU but dog slow RAM.

In answer to your question. Yes.

CNET Forums