Ink vs. laser, in the long run, laser is cheaper to run, depending also on the amount of output. Next, laser tends to be more dependable or robust overall, but ink will provide good service for the avg. user. Once, you get heavy demand and don't need color that much, then definetly laser. However, if usage is typically low and not into grand output, a inkjet will do fine. If you generally only need copier type output, then get one. The beauty of all-in-one, is you get more for the buck but at the same time, more can go wrong. The cost is relative depending on ease, reliability and consumerable costs, so wieght those and make a decision. But, if cost too much the decision maker, then consider if you have to replace in too short of a period, include that in the final cost due to overuse and/or possible ink problems.
tada -----Willy ![]()
I need a copier, and am interested in a sub-$200 Canon dedicated analog personal copier. I do maybe 10 copies a day on average. Would the Canon copier do a better job and last longer that a comparably priced laser all-in-one? Thanks

Chowhound
Comic Vine
GameFAQs
GameSpot
Giant Bomb
TechRepublic