Thank you for being a valued part of the CNET community. As of December 1, 2020, the forums are in read-only format. In early 2021, CNET Forums will no longer be available. We are grateful for the participation and advice you have provided to one another over the years.

Thanks,

CNET Support

General discussion

Pentium-M 733 ULV performance?

Jun 27, 2005 5:37AM PDT

Does anybody know something about the performance of a Pentium-M 733 1.1GHz? I didnt find anything on googlin though the web. There was a thread which was about the 725 i think where they said that the 1MB L2-Cache is a handicap. The 733 now has 2MB aswell and a dothan-core. Can you compare it with an Pentium 4 like the normal Pentium-M (Pentium 4 X 2) or something like that?

Discussion is locked

- Collapse -
On average 2X.
Jun 27, 2005 6:09AM PDT

If you need anything more exacting, you'll have to run a benchmark.

Bob

- Collapse -
compare?
Jun 27, 2005 6:32PM PDT

Thats the problem. I dont have a notebook yet. But i want to buy one and now i have to decide between a normal Pentium-M and the ulv version. A friend of mine who is a hardware freak said that the Pentium-M processors loose more power the lower the frequence gets. So the power is not linear. And it would be fine to see a benchmark or something like that before. Or if you can say that the ulv 1.1 is like a pentium 4 2.2.

- Collapse -
Not like. Close in performance to.
Jun 27, 2005 10:01PM PDT

The 2X is a general performance comparison between the 2 CPU families. If "close in performance" is not exact enough for you, then a benchmark must be found or done.

It rarely is the bottomline issue since some want to play games and the CPU is not the issue but the display chipset.

Hope it helps.

Bob

- Collapse -
Thanks for help
Jun 27, 2005 10:36PM PDT

I found someone who bought a notebook with this cpu. He said he'll do a bench for me. Happy

I know that this CPU is not for gaming, but it would ne fine to run compile a kernel faster than on a 1GHz Normal-Pentium system. Happy

Thanks so fare.

- Collapse -
Actually could be a great game machine.
Jun 27, 2005 10:46PM PDT

It's more than 2 to 4 times what a XBOX has. And my kid's 1.0GHz Athlon was great at games with a nice 3D card. The CPU was not the bottleneck there.

-> Compile time will be hampered not by this CPU but the hard disk speed. Here's an example.

My old p3-600 would boot Windows 2000 in over 4 minutes. I did all I know and couldn't break the 4 minute mark. I looked over the machine and replaced the hard disk with a nice 5400 RPM disk and the boot time dropped to under 2 minutes. It wasn't a CPU or RAM issue.

Bob