Laptops forum

General discussion

Pentium-M 733 ULV performance?

Does anybody know something about the performance of a Pentium-M 733 1.1GHz? I didnt find anything on googlin though the web. There was a thread which was about the 725 i think where they said that the 1MB L2-Cache is a handicap. The 733 now has 2MB aswell and a dothan-core. Can you compare it with an Pentium 4 like the normal Pentium-M (Pentium 4 X 2) or something like that?

Discussion is locked
You are posting a reply to: Pentium-M 733 ULV performance?
The posting of advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks is prohibited. Please refer to our CNET Forums policies for details. All submitted content is subject to our Terms of Use.
Track this discussion and email me when there are updates

If you're asking for technical help, please be sure to include all your system info, including operating system, model number, and any other specifics related to the problem. Also please exercise your best judgment when posting in the forums--revealing personal information such as your e-mail address, telephone number, and address is not recommended.

You are reporting the following post: Pentium-M 733 ULV performance?
This post has been flagged and will be reviewed by our staff. Thank you for helping us maintain CNET's great community.
Sorry, there was a problem flagging this post. Please try again now or at a later time.
If you believe this post is offensive or violates the CNET Forums' Usage policies, you can report it below (this will not automatically remove the post). Once reported, our moderators will be notified and the post will be reviewed.
Collapse -
On average 2X.

In reply to: Pentium-M 733 ULV performance?

If you need anything more exacting, you'll have to run a benchmark.


Collapse -

In reply to: On average 2X.

Thats the problem. I dont have a notebook yet. But i want to buy one and now i have to decide between a normal Pentium-M and the ulv version. A friend of mine who is a hardware freak said that the Pentium-M processors loose more power the lower the frequence gets. So the power is not linear. And it would be fine to see a benchmark or something like that before. Or if you can say that the ulv 1.1 is like a pentium 4 2.2.

Collapse -
Not like. Close in performance to.

In reply to: compare?

The 2X is a general performance comparison between the 2 CPU families. If "close in performance" is not exact enough for you, then a benchmark must be found or done.

It rarely is the bottomline issue since some want to play games and the CPU is not the issue but the display chipset.

Hope it helps.


Collapse -
Thanks for help

In reply to: Not like. Close in performance to.

I found someone who bought a notebook with this cpu. He said he'll do a bench for me. Happy

I know that this CPU is not for gaming, but it would ne fine to run compile a kernel faster than on a 1GHz Normal-Pentium system. Happy

Thanks so fare.

Collapse -
Actually could be a great game machine.

In reply to: Thanks for help

It's more than 2 to 4 times what a XBOX has. And my kid's 1.0GHz Athlon was great at games with a nice 3D card. The CPU was not the bottleneck there.

-> Compile time will be hampered not by this CPU but the hard disk speed. Here's an example.

My old p3-600 would boot Windows 2000 in over 4 minutes. I did all I know and couldn't break the 4 minute mark. I looked over the machine and replaced the hard disk with a nice 5400 RPM disk and the boot time dropped to under 2 minutes. It wasn't a CPU or RAM issue.


Popular Forums

Computer Newbies 10,686 discussions
Computer Help 54,365 discussions
Laptops 21,181 discussions
Networking & Wireless 16,313 discussions
Phones 17,137 discussions
Security 31,287 discussions
TVs & Home Theaters 22,101 discussions
Windows 7 8,164 discussions
Windows 10 2,657 discussions


This one tip will help you sleep better tonight

A few seconds are all you need to get a better night's rest.