Thank you for being a valued part of the CNET community. As of December 1, 2020, the forums are in read-only format. In early 2021, CNET Forums will no longer be available. We are grateful for the participation and advice you have provided to one another over the years.

Thanks,

CNET Support

Question

PC vs Android

Jul 9, 2012 8:57AM PDT

Which is more secure to pay bills, PC or Android?

Discussion is locked

- Collapse -
Answer
Neither it seems.
Jul 9, 2012 9:49AM PDT

Since we can intercept messages/content on both, why would we consider one better than than other?

In fact, around the office we came up with an explanation for a lot of issues. Ready?

"Android, it's the new Windows."
Bob

- Collapse -
Thank You
Jul 9, 2012 12:06PM PDT

That's what I kind of figured. Nothings safe anymore, not even the USPS, LOL
Thank You

- Collapse -
Nothing has ever been safe
Jul 9, 2012 11:57PM PDT

Nothing has ever been safe. If you walk into the place of business with cash to pay a bill, there's nothing saying the person you hand the cash to won't just pocket it. Send a check, there's nothing saying the wrong person won't cash it (I am personally aware of instances where companies have cashed checks made out to former employees), credit card numbers can be (and have been) stolen. Things like PayPal, for all their hype about security are probably less secure than a credit card, just because they're tied directly to a bank account.

All in all, credit cards are probably the most secure method of payment. You can dispute charges, they are quite vigilant about watching for suspicious activity, and at least in the US, you're only responsible for like the first $50 of fraudulent charges. Which was probably a lot more money when that particular regulation went into place.

Still, it doesn't really matter how secure things are on your end if someone just breaks into the merchant's systems. If you do business with a company that stores all credit card info in plain text, no encryption, and doesn't really bother properly securing their back end systems, I don't care if you have a quantum entangled communication system which is impossible to intercept, your data is still at risk. I think of it kind of like a Red vs. Blue episode... One guy asks a soldier to open the gate to his base. The soldier says, "Sorry, no can do! See this here is a secure facility!" The guy responds with, "Then I guess we'll just have to go through the giant hole in the wall of your secure facility." And the camera pans over to show a huge section of the wall has collapsed.