First and foremost, allow me to congratulate you on your plasma purchase. You made the right decision, and for the price, you picked out the best damn plasma there is.
Secondly, image retention affects all plasmas. The question is to what degree. Panasonics have significantly improved their resistance to image retention, running cooler and incorporating a pixel orbiter. I would put the 85-series Panasonic just below the Pioneer PDP-5080HD, which would qualify as the least-prone image retainer of any plasma. PROVIDED that you first properly break-in the plasma, there will be no issues. But for the first 200 hours, you should adjust the set to 'cinema' mode. This will eliminate the chance of early phosphor wear and increase panel life (so you get the 20yrs. you payed for).
I am presuming you are equipped with a power conditioner and/or a step-down transformer. If not, get one fast (www.monsterpower.com or www.richardgreyspowercompany.com). This is a life-saver if there ever was one. This will allow the set to give you the life and picture quality you payed for in the first place, unlocking it's true potential (when connected to the right sources).
No LCD will give a cleaner picture, as there is no response time with Plasma sets. Even with 120hz, there is considerable motion lag layered with processing artifacts (from the 120hjz processor), so the gaming experience on an LCD is nothing compared to that of a plasma. Plus, dark scenes will be more visible and detailed on the plasma, making Halo a lot easier (I can testify for that one). With a punchier contrast, the Panasonic will invigorate the senses in a way that no LCD can.
Enough Said, I suppose you get it now.
-N.
I just purchased a Panny TH-42PZ85U but have not had it delivered yet. The main question I have seems to have a WIDE range in opinions which has to do with burn in and image retention. I have avoided Plasmas until this day because I play a lot of games. This TV will go in my bedroom so it won't see near as much gaming. I started getting Halo 2 burn in on my older Pioneer Elite 510 CRT I had so I sold it before it got to bad and I purchased a JVC LCOS 55" and overall I've liked it. Fast gaming and burn in free. In the bedroom I will eventually get another 360 to play games on so my son and I can play online together with 2 different TVs or someone else can play in the other room if I'm playing in the livingroom.
SO, on to my question. Do today's Plasma TVs, the Panny here as my main concern, have horrible burn in problems? Many people may say something about the 4:3 material but that is all but extinct for me. Primarily I'll be watching DVDs and movies with some videogames at times. With that in mind can some of you guys chime in with opinions? Is there a good alternative? When I started looking at LCDs that would give me complete peace of mind about gaming the price jumpes from $1000 to at least $1300 so you are talking 1/3 more and that is for a typical 60hz. I did see a Philips 42PFL7403D that seemed to have a pretty good picture, 1080p, 120hz, 4 HDMI at Sams. This is the only TV I've seen around the same price range with 120hz and it seems LOADED compared to the Panny I just paid for. Any thoughts are welcomed. Well, not any. Keep any rants to yourself. ![]()

Chowhound
Comic Vine
GameFAQs
GameSpot
Giant Bomb
TechRepublic