General discussion

Oops, sorry Iran. (RU missiles fall short.)

Discussion is locked
Reply to: Oops, sorry Iran. (RU missiles fall short.)
PLEASE NOTE: Do not post advertisements, offensive materials, profanity, or personal attacks. Please remember to be considerate of other members. If you are new to the CNET Forums, please read our CNET Forums FAQ. All submitted content is subject to our Terms of Use.
Reporting: Oops, sorry Iran. (RU missiles fall short.)
This post has been flagged and will be reviewed by our staff. Thank you for helping us maintain CNET's great community.
Sorry, there was a problem flagging this post. Please try again now or at a later time.
If you believe this post is offensive or violates the CNET Forums' Usage policies, you can report it below (this will not automatically remove the post). Once reported, our moderators will be notified and the post will be reviewed.
- Collapse -
Vladimir said.

Duh! Close enough.

- Collapse -
Or did he?

"Free demonstration model."
"Feel free to send a few our way."

- Collapse -
(NT) Looks good on them....
- Collapse -
Older technology inside?

Or maybe deflected by accidental artillery fire? Didn't we expend a lot of old ordnance in the first Iraq war including such used in "Iowa-class" battleships? Oh, what to do with old explosives during times of peace. Cruise missiles are full of electronics. As such, these can be temperamental. I've had spiders get into smoke detectors and set them off. Who knows what goes on in weapons storage facilities. You can't really test drive every one of these before sending them on their one and only mission.

- Collapse -
Long ago in a prior job.

We did indeed test drive the guidance, sensors, fins, etc. prior to launch. The rocket or jet, well that was up to another company. In those days if it mattered you launched 2 missiles for each target. Just in case.

CNET Forums