Attention: The forums will be placed on read only mode this Saturday (Oct. 20, 2018)

During this outage (6:30 AM to 8 PM PDT) the forums will be placed on read only mode. We apologize for this inconvenience. Click here to read details

Speakeasy forum

General discussion

Ohio Republi's want to say "CAN'T" at polls

by netsky / October 31, 2004 11:23 PM PST
Discussion is locked
You are posting a reply to: Ohio Republi's want to say "CAN'T" at polls
The posting of advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks is prohibited. Please refer to our CNET Forums policies for details. All submitted content is subject to our Terms of Use.
Track this discussion and email me when there are updates

If you're asking for technical help, please be sure to include all your system info, including operating system, model number, and any other specifics related to the problem. Also please exercise your best judgment when posting in the forums--revealing personal information such as your e-mail address, telephone number, and address is not recommended.

You are reporting the following post: Ohio Republi's want to say "CAN'T" at polls
This post has been flagged and will be reviewed by our staff. Thank you for helping us maintain CNET's great community.
Sorry, there was a problem flagging this post. Please try again now or at a later time.
If you believe this post is offensive or violates the CNET Forums' Usage policies, you can report it below (this will not automatically remove the post). Once reported, our moderators will be notified and the post will be reviewed.
Collapse -
I see problems on both sides of the fence.
by C1ay / October 31, 2004 11:55 PM PST

I agree with the judge that there should not be inexperienced challengers trying to test the validity of registrations of people standing in line to vote. This is what elections laws, procedures and trained election workers are for. I question how and why a law to permit this was even passed.

OTOH, the article also states that the same judge halted legal challenges to registrations last week when mail could not be delivered to 35,000 addresses on the voter registration records. It was hypocritical of the judge to say, "does not indicate that the presence of additional challengers would serve Ohio's interest in preventing voter fraud better than would the system of election judges." on the issue of challengers at polling places when it was she, as an election judge, that halted the challenges in the courtroom.

I personally have a problem with all that has surfaced about double voters in Florida, New York, North and South Carolina as well. I can see how people can be double registered. That happens whenever someone moves since no one goes to cancel their registration in their previous precinct. When they actually identify that some of them have double voted though, I think it's time to hold them accountable under the law. These morons don't deserve to vote.

Collapse -
I see no problems with throwing out
by Dragon / November 1, 2004 1:13 AM PST

those 'registered' voters. It is the voters responsibility to make sure they are registered and done so correctly.

I had also heard of instances where Democrats were objecting to people checking regstration against the records when they came in to vote...that these people should be allowed to vote, anyway. Poppycock!

Popular Forums

Computer Newbies 10,686 discussions
Computer Help 54,365 discussions
Laptops 21,181 discussions
Networking & Wireless 16,313 discussions
Phones 17,137 discussions
Security 31,287 discussions
TVs & Home Theaters 22,101 discussions
Windows 7 8,164 discussions
Windows 10 2,657 discussions


Your favorite shows are back!

Don’t miss your dramas, sitcoms and reality shows. Find out when and where they’re airing!