Speakeasy forum

General discussion

Of course things look like they're

Discussion is locked
You are posting a reply to: Of course things look like they're
The posting of advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks is prohibited. Please refer to our CNET Forums policies for details. All submitted content is subject to our Terms of Use.
Track this discussion and email me when there are updates

If you're asking for technical help, please be sure to include all your system info, including operating system, model number, and any other specifics related to the problem. Also please exercise your best judgment when posting in the forums--revealing personal information such as your e-mail address, telephone number, and address is not recommended.

You are reporting the following post: Of course things look like they're
This post has been flagged and will be reviewed by our staff. Thank you for helping us maintain CNET's great community.
Sorry, there was a problem flagging this post. Please try again now or at a later time.
If you believe this post is offensive or violates the CNET Forums' Usage policies, you can report it below (this will not automatically remove the post). Once reported, our moderators will be notified and the post will be reviewed.
Collapse -
(NT) (NT) Typical, if you don't like the news, eliminate the messenger

In reply to: Of course things look like they're

Collapse -
My take.

In reply to: Of course things look like they're

The article cited global acts of terrorism. If the suicide/murder human and car bomb attacks are included, it is easy to see how the number has risen. It also puts the onus on leaders in other countries to accept they are not immune and need to take steps to lessen the threats to them. t-Targets considered to be "soft" are everywhere.

As I recall, TWA incident was in 1984, before the Gulf and Iraqi wars, so , IMO, neither can be blamed for being the catalyst.

IMO, we don't necessarily need an annual report, if we follow the news.

I don't know if the acts of despots/dictators and tribal leaders in some countries are included. They have been happening for years.

Though there could have been a clue from Israel's experience with people willing to blow themselves up using low-tech methods to kill as many civilians as possible, it has not been easy for Western leaders to come to terms with just how many fall prey to that mind-set.

I am reminded also of London's past experience with bombers. It has taken many years and the efforts of dedicated people to reduce, and hopefully ended, that threat.

All war is immoral, but those fought between identifiable uniformed combatants were on the basis of what was considered to have a moral purpose at the time. Hindsight and crowing over mistakes in judgment and motives does absolutely nothing to change the situation.

Especially when no concrete and viable solutions are offered.

Leaving the Iraqis high and dry at this point in time is not one of them.

Angeline


click here to email semods4@yahoo.com

Collapse -
And they are if you READ what is there...

In reply to: Of course things look like they're

because you will note that attacks on American (and coalition too) troops are not counted but the attacks on Iraqi civilians are.

Those increased attacks give an erroneous picture of GLOBAL TERRORISM attacks.

I see that Angeline easily spotted that, but then she tends to think about what she reads rather than simply accepting things blindly and at face value.

Would that you had the ability.

Popular Forums

icon
Computer Newbies 10,686 discussions
icon
Computer Help 54,365 discussions
icon
Laptops 21,181 discussions
icon
Networking & Wireless 16,313 discussions
icon
Phones 17,137 discussions
icon
Security 31,287 discussions
icon
TVs & Home Theaters 22,101 discussions
icon
Windows 7 8,164 discussions
icon
Windows 10 2,657 discussions

GIVEAWAY

Enter to win* a free holiday tech gift!

CNET's giving five lucky winners the gift of their choice valued up to $250!