Objective tests by major organizations Malware Bytes (MBAM)

There is quite a major discussion going on in your colleagues, Alt Comp Freeware, concerning MBAM, aka Malware Bytes Antimalware. One contributor contends that
he has never seen a test of the effectiveness of MBAM by a major antimalware testing organization. I wish to ask you for references to objective tests of MBAM: how effective it is, and if possible, how it rates with the big guns: Norton,
AVG, MSSE etc.
Thanks a lot for your help.

Discussion is locked
Reply to: Objective tests by major organizations Malware Bytes (MBAM)
PLEASE NOTE: Do not post advertisements, offensive materials, profanity, or personal attacks. Please remember to be considerate of other members. If you are new to the CNET Forums, please read our CNET Forums FAQ. All submitted content is subject to our Terms of Use.
Reporting: Objective tests by major organizations Malware Bytes (MBAM)
This post has been flagged and will be reviewed by our staff. Thank you for helping us maintain CNET's great community.
Sorry, there was a problem flagging this post. Please try again now or at a later time.
If you believe this post is offensive or violates the CNET Forums' Usage policies, you can report it below (this will not automatically remove the post). Once reported, our moderators will be notified and the post will be reviewed.
- Collapse -
Then why use it?

You have other choices but let's cover off -> FUD <-

You find that makers of products can sometimes use FUD (fear, uncertainty and doubt) to discredit the other products or solutions.

If you agree with the FUD being cast about them you make your choice and buy their product. It's that simple.

-> There is indeed an issue with effectiveness. Read the next link.;threadListing

None of the free tools can remove this pest and at the time neither could most of the antivirus names. And even the one that could fix it, could only do so if you had a Windows 7 retail DVD handy.

So you're right, all the tools were ineffective when it came right down to this nasty.

- Collapse -
Objective tests of Malware Bytes(MBAM):R. Proffitt; Grif T.

This reply is also for friend Grif Thomas.
I thank you very much R. Proffitt and also friend Grif Thomas. You two have answered so far, and you are too kind. The freeware and foss sites are swarming with rumors which may be exaggerated. If you consult such sites, MBAM has an enormous panache. When I saw the contributor, at Alt. Cmp. Freeware, named "Pooh the Cat", who is a PC repair tech, and an old friend of over a decade, cast doubt upon MBAM, I had to check that one out. You corroborated his doubts. Many thanks.
Kindest wishes!
Robb Thurston

- Collapse -
But That Doesn't Mean It's Not A Good Tool.....

As I stated earlier, Malwarebytes has worked well for me in many instances...but unfortunately, there is no perfect malware removal tool and I've yet to find a good antispyware test site which evaluates those tools.. Such is the problem with constantly mutating malware and its the reason a variety of tools, experience, and a little bit of luck are required when tackling the problem.

Hope this helps.


- Collapse -
Interesting Question Please Show ANY Antispyware Test Site

Although there are a few good antiVIRUS test sites, (such as, I know of no unbiased antiSPYWARE sites. The antivirus test sites have standard testing criteria and it's fairly easy to rate programs.. Unfortunately, because spyware/malware changes on a daily basis, I'm not sure effective standard tests are within the realm of possibility.. So, that's my best direct answer to your question. Sorry.

In regards to the use of Malwarebytes, I have used it MANY times in the removal of malware on infected machines.. It was recommended to me long ago (Check for example), and I still continue to use it as ONE of MANY tools when an infected computer is brought to me. I use it because it has worked for me in a number of cases, but not all.. And because it doesn't repair everything, and because different tools seem to find different things, I use a variety of removal tools. In addition, Malwarebytes is fairly easy to install and manually update on an infected computer, something the "big guns" are frequently incapable of. Also, on almost ALL of the computers I've been asked to recover, they seem to have one of the big guns already installed.. Installing McAfee or Norton on an infected computer is near impossible..

But as Bob mentioned earlier, don't use if you're not happy with it.. Since it's free, try something else which works better for you.

Hope this helps.


CNET Forums