aggressive action against ISIS and it wouldn't have existed by the time Obama came to the office.
![]() | Thank you for being a valued part of the CNET community. As of December 1, 2020, the forums are in read-only format. In early 2021, CNET Forums will no longer be available. We are grateful for the participation and advice you have provided to one another over the years. Thanks, CNET Support |
Discussion is locked
aggressive action against ISIS and it wouldn't have existed by the time Obama came to the office.
If I recall correctly, we had AQ and the Taliban and what is ISIS now was part of AQ....until BO took office and pulled our troops out. ISIS was kicked out of AQ for being so gruesome that even THEY couldn't tolerate those members.
and another group would be the group that causes "collateral damage" while trying to kill Radical Islamic Terrorists......
How bout America defeats all the gangs in America first...THEN move on to saving other countries.
It would be an excellent "proving ground" for methods to kill/destroy ISIS
...Gangs are living among the population and controlling their "neighbourhoods" Much like ISIS....
and to allow more members to come across the border freely....
Any 'proving ground' has to come from Republicans again.........look to NYC and all the liberal Dem policies that have totally reversed the gains that were being made previously by Rudy and Bloomberg. Does it sound even a little bit like what happened in Iraq after BO?
...Libya and Egypt and Yemen? Syria gained Sadam's WMD on Iraq's fall to us. What's going on in the Middle East can't all be explained away as Bush or Obama in Iraq, nor dealings with Iran, there's more to it than just that. There's an entire sea change of power going on over there in the Middle East and wider spread than USA involvement.