and THEY shall be known as?
Capitalists.
That's how YOU referred to them....Why shouldn't I refer to them as Capitalists?
![]() | Thank you for being a valued part of the CNET community. As of December 1, 2020, the forums are in read-only format. In early 2021, CNET Forums will no longer be available. We are grateful for the participation and advice you have provided to one another over the years. Thanks, CNET Support |
Discussion is locked
and THEY shall be known as?
Capitalists.
That's how YOU referred to them....Why shouldn't I refer to them as Capitalists?
Senate Technology committee has bragged that he has never even sent an email.
she "instructed" the State Department NOT to release her e-mail.
I see you failed to mention previous laws regarding archiving documents and emails...which was NEVER done by HC during her entire tenure as SofS....and waited two YEARS, AFTER she left office and her emails were being subpoenaed by Congress, and even THEN, SHE decided what to send and not send....and PRINTED those emails (which CAN be ALTERED in case you don't know that because I've personally done that on my own computer to prove it can be done) rather than actually FORWARD the originals to the State Dept.
>>Sept. 9, 2013: The National Archives updates regulations on the handling of e-mails and federal records: "While agency employees should not generally use personal email accounts to conduct official agency business, there may be times when agencies authorize the use of personal email accounts, such as in emergency situations when Federal accounts are not accessible or when an employee is initially contacted through a personal account."
She was told by the WH when she got the nod as SofS to archive her emails, but she instead, two days before taking that position, set up the private server in her HOUSE....which is the same charges that Petreius just pled guilty to....having classified information unsecured in his personal possession away from the WH (and ANY emails that discussed ANYTHING to do with government business is considered to be classified until deemed otherwise by the WH, NOT HER since she was no longer an employee)
You will never figure this out or even attempt to......but if it was ok to indict Petreius, then she should be in next.....especially since there are MONTHS of gaps in the emails during Benghazi that have never been turned over, and there is no way you can convince the public that she went for months with NO email activity at all as SofS. This is long from over.......
Yes....the recipient or the sender of an email would also have a copy on their server.....BUT without having seen HER server to know who those people all are, subpoenas would be difficult to obtain because there is no knowledge of where those servers are......unless they were all on a .gov email server, and unless Congress has the name of the person who received or sent it to issue that subpoena in the first place. THAT'S how she had managed to keep HER emails out of the public eye for so long.
Every email that was printed and finally sent to the State Dept, since they weren't the original emails forwarded, has also gone to Congress over the last couple of weeks and any name on those emails other than hers will now have subpoena power to get all of THEIR emails to see what, if any, emails were left out from HC's 'accounting'.......
Subpoenas here in the USA have to be very specific....not sure how it's done in Canada....and if you don't know what you don't know because all of the information hasn't been given to you, discovery is nearly impossible, and the Clinton's (and this administration) are experts at duck, dodge, evade, deflect, and hide.
The digging will continue for quite a while.....and they will also be looking at their options for getting physical custody of that server since she is so adamant about not letting them have it.
probably do that NOW since many of HER printing pages will have their email names/accounts used; however, they can only do 'keystrokes' IF those people have used a .gov email account. If THEY also used personal email accounts, those would have to be subpoenaed. You don't seem to comprehend any of this and how things work here.....so I forgive your ignorance.
Which is why HC was so arrogant about stating that her emails were archived on OTHER people's accounts.......and that those could be looked at..........IF she DIDN'T include, in her printed copies sent to the State Dept since SHE picked and chose what to send to them, any personal accounts for those people, then a whole new set of issues arise, and we know for a fact that SOME of her people DID use personal accounts, because one of them was recently FIRED for doing so, which, because of a FOIA request against HIM, it was discovered that he was emailing HC to HER personal account.
they can only do 'keystrokes' IF those people have used a .gov email account. If THEY also used personal email accounts, those would have to be subpoenaed. You don't seem to comprehend any of this and how things work here.....so I forgive your ignorance.
IGNORANCE?...IGNORANCE?
IF those people have used a .gov email account. THEN they would be on a gov server? a gov...THEIR as in gov. server....Correct?
What do you think I'm saying in THIS statement I posted in the above post
I don't think it's too difficult for the gov to punch a few keys and tell THEIR servers to produce ALL correspondence TO HC.
I forgive your thickness.
Just as you have the news on TV playing in the background, you pick up a few words of a story then fill in the missing bits with your vision of "the truth according to Toni H"...You read posts in SE the same way.
IF those people have PERSONAL accounts and HC corresponded with them THAT way, THOSE emails would NOT be on a government server, and would have to be subpoenaed to get them. Again, I excuse your ignorance.
are subject to the Federal Laws in place for cabinet members and the President.....and those you mentioned aren't the ones who put those laws into place. THAT was done during the Dem control of both Houses........complain to THEM instead.
You didn't cry then...WHY are you crying now?
Because "your side" was doing it?
Funny how that works isn't it?
that ALL of those emails were found, don't you? Can you say the same for YOUR side (IRS, Lerner, HC)?
Diana....I already replied to that story and those emails were found and turned over to the State Dept.
JP....It was done the same way that HC should be doing it...turn over the server to the State Dept for scrutiny. The difference is that the RNC didn't pick and choose and delete what they wanted.
The way it legally works is ALL of the emails are turned over and the STATE DEPT determines what is government business and what isn't....and what isn't is returned to the person or organization as their private business. That isn't what HC has done......
leaves HC off the hook for HER deliberately deleting emails that only SHE determined didn't have government business on them? AND that she left the WH and didn't turn over the original emails but rather printed copies only after a LAWSUIT forced it (sound familiar?) and then, only what SHE determined was appropriate without originals. At least with Bush, millions WERE recovered and they were all originals, not printed copies.....how many do you think HC will ALLOW to be recovered? Do you think Holder or this WH will confiscate the server?
Should she be allowed to be above the laws that SHE complained about so loudly over the Bush emails?