Thank you for being a valued part of the CNET community. As of December 1, 2020, the forums are in read-only format. In early 2021, CNET Forums will no longer be available. We are grateful for the participation and advice you have provided to one another over the years.

Thanks,

CNET Support

General discussion

(NT) zacarias found guilty /gets life

May 3, 2006 6:36AM PDT

Discussion is locked

- Collapse -
OK, here's what I don't get
May 3, 2006 6:46AM PDT

If, as this Administration keeps saying, this is a war and should not be treated as a law enforcement matter, why was he on trial in a civilian court? Why no military tribunal?

- Collapse -
(NT) (NT) idiot lives id hung him
May 3, 2006 6:50AM PDT
- Collapse -
Transparency, so the public
May 3, 2006 6:54AM PDT

can see the evidence that is used against him. He's put on display to represent the whole terrorist movement... allowing the public some closure on 9/11.

- Collapse -
Boy, would that have backfired....
May 3, 2006 7:47AM PDT

....if he'd been found Not Guilty by reason of insanity.

- Collapse -
yep. I think he was declared sane in the first phase
May 3, 2006 9:30AM PDT

But I would agree it would be better to be in a military tribunal. It would go faster and we woulnd't spend millions of dollars on it. I disagree with the "give the people closure" argument.

Aside from that, I am opposed to the death penalty on because of insane cost, alone. With that money we could build more prisons if we need them.

- Collapse -
If the government wants to give the People closure.....
May 3, 2006 12:38PM PDT

.....they can do it by capturing bin Laden.

- Collapse -
Not like they haven't been doing everything to
May 3, 2006 1:17PM PDT

make that happen for the past 5 years...

- Collapse -
Not necessarily...
May 3, 2006 11:05AM PDT

if played correctly in the media... could be used to discredit remaining terrorist leaders.
Although, that's assuming the media would be willing to work with the government to save lives... something that hasn't always been a high priority.

- Collapse -
Because he was in custody BEFORE 911
May 3, 2006 2:23PM PDT

and all subsequent laws do not apply.

unlesss the lawmakers had some sort of information that he would be charged 5+ y after the fact and had made the law retroctive.

- Collapse -
(NT) (NT) He said "America lost" then clapped his hands
May 3, 2006 8:58AM PDT
- Collapse -
Good!
May 3, 2006 11:06AM PDT

I do support the death penalty, but not in this case. He is obviously 'as nutty as a fruitcake' so there is no special virtue (or justice) in executing him. Furthermore, the execution would just give the terrorists one more martyr.

FWIW I would suggest that a more appropriate sentence would be life at hard labor working on a pig farm. No martyrdom, no 72 virgins and plenty of work with an unclean animal.

- Collapse -
I like your idea........
May 3, 2006 1:19PM PDT

I think that would be a fitting punishment! I believe most prisons do have pig farms Devil