Thank you for being a valued part of the CNET community. As of December 1, 2020, the forums are in read-only format. In early 2021, CNET Forums will no longer be available. We are grateful for the participation and advice you have provided to one another over the years.

Thanks,

CNET Support

General discussion

(NT) 26.5 vets had their SS# & other info stolen

May 22, 2006 8:47AM PDT

Discussion is locked

- Collapse -
(NT) (NT) ooooops,26.5 million
May 22, 2006 8:48AM PDT
- Collapse -
(NT) (NT) Was wondering who the half was ;-)
May 22, 2006 8:59AM PDT
- Collapse -
(NT) (NT) :)
May 22, 2006 9:12AM PDT
- Collapse -
(NT) (NT) From Where?....How?
May 22, 2006 9:03AM PDT
- Collapse -
From Where?....How?
May 22, 2006 9:11AM PDT

I don't know to much about it.I just recently heard on the news that an employee at the VA downloaded the info to a disk.

Tom

- Collapse -
Here Tom is a link....
May 22, 2006 9:13AM PDT
- Collapse -
Thanx...
May 22, 2006 9:20AM PDT

I truly beleive that the SS system needs to be revamped.

ID theft is far to easy,and very difficult for the victims to recover.

Tom

- Collapse -
Just one more incident...........
May 23, 2006 6:09AM PDT

This incident stands to point up, once again, the ?disregard? for protecting sensitive information that exists throughout government agencies.

Remember the Los Alamos Lab thing a few years back, (Yep, Los Alamos National Laboratory, considered one of the most ?secure? activities around, where they develop, and supposedly help protect the nuclear assets of this country) where a hard drive containing highly sensitive information ?went missing?. As the investigation played out it revealed that ?scientists? considered themselves too highly paid and too busy to be bothered with maintaining signature audit trails of material, as required by law and regulation. A ?violative practice? that had existed for decades, back to the early days of the Manhattan Project. More than a few ?admin? types had been reassigned, or fired, over the years, for attempting to correct the problem.

Too many details not yet disclosed to draw too many conclusions in the current incident with the VA. They keep talking about ?data?. Not a laptop or such. Data ? CD?s ? How many burglars would be interested in CD?s ? Music or video possibly, but ?misc? CDs ?

If the burglars just ?scooped?, and haven?t sorted and thrown away, the media has certainly alerted them to a ?saleable? item.

This lack of responsible attention to the protection of sensitive information is prevalent throughout the bureaucracy of government. Too many bureaucrats spend an entire career in the same office, in the same job, attending meetings, writing reports of their daily activities, while oblivious of activity that needs attention.

Regular reassignment of department heads and supervisory personnel has great merit. Individuals responsible for implementing and monitoring security should answer to other than the head of the agency to which they are assigned.