unfavorably to the 20D. Also, Nikon is encrypting their raw files, and their raw file software is an extra cost item. Canon's software is included with the camera, and they are not encrypting. Encryption can block things like Photoshop from working with the raw image files. That is a BIG negative.
The 2 megapixel boost in image size is more significant than it looks, and the speed and low light advantages are significant.
I was all set to buy the Canon EOS 20D when a local photo pro told me I was nuts unless I already had a bunch of Canon lenses. He said the Nikon takes better pictures despite the two fewer MPs and that the selection and quality of lenses is much better for the Nikon (I already have 6 Nikon lenses but they are the older AI-Nikkor series for the 35mm F3.) What do you think? The Canon will run about $1,900 with the medium quality (not L-series) EF-S 17-85mm lens. The Nikon is $1,000 less including the inexpensive lens that comes with the "kit." That leaves $1,000 for more lenses.

Chowhound
Comic Vine
GameFAQs
GameSpot
Giant Bomb
TechRepublic