Thank you for being a valued part of the CNET community. As of December 1, 2020, the forums are in read-only format. In early 2021, CNET Forums will no longer be available. We are grateful for the participation and advice you have provided to one another over the years.

Thanks,

CNET Support

Rant

New font is terrible

Oct 10, 2011 6:22AM PDT

The new font is so hard to read in Chrome and IE. What was CNET thinking? Now I know what 80 year olds must feel like when they try to read with their failing eyesights.

Discussion is locked

- Collapse -
Another Squeaky Wheel
Oct 14, 2011 12:59AM PDT

I do have Clear Type turned on in IE8 and have optimized it for my monitor by using "Clear Type Text Tuner".

That did improve my Clear Type display a bit.

But it did nothing for the CNET font used in their drop down Menus.

That typeface looks like it came from a 1950's typewriter that needs a new ink ribbon.

Very retro, somewhat ugly.

I will look forward to improvements.

Joe Randolph
Snapshot2

- Collapse -
Joe, can you give me an example of a CNET dropdown menu?
Oct 14, 2011 2:30AM PDT

Or possibly even a screenshot.

I'd appreciate it.

And thanks for the feedback!

-Lee

- Collapse -
Font/Typeface
Oct 14, 2011 5:00AM PDT
- Collapse -
That's interesting
Oct 14, 2011 5:06AM PDT

Here's a screen print of the same pull down menu with me. Using Firefox;

http://imageshack.us/f/13/fontng.jpg/

You might have to enlarge it.

Just supplying it for comparison, but you can see mine is much clearer and more solid. I don't know why there are differences on stock systems and stock browser settings.

Mark

- Collapse -
Loose_Screw's complaint
Oct 14, 2011 11:12AM PDT

Loose_Screw and I (and others) are seeing the same problem.
He is frustrated because no one believes him.
I DO believe him.

Why it only shows up on some computers, I don't know.

It is related to the new CNET choice of fonts because it only shows up on CNET.

The engineers could change the font to something else and let us see what happens.
Maybe that would give them a clue as to the cause.
I am willing to help if I can.

Joe Randolph
Snapshot2

- Collapse -
FYI they are working on something.
Oct 17, 2011 9:21AM PDT

That's all I can say. Hopefully for the better for everyone...

Stay tuned.

Thanks!
-Lee

- Collapse -
Re: old typewriter
Oct 14, 2011 5:46AM PDT

From the css-file and from looking at it, it seems the "Museo Slab" font. http://new.myfonts.com/fonts/exljbris/museo-slab/ says it's designed in 2009. So I don't think your typewriter had that.

It says about itself: "Museo Slab is robust slab serif with Museo's friendliness". And it has a rating of 4.5/5.

Kees

- Collapse -
re: I agree
Oct 23, 2011 8:47PM PDT

I would agree about the fonts. You really should stick to browser compliant fonts and tell your print designers to chill on using the swanky yet troublesome scripts that allow you to render any font via a browser. (typeface.js etc). Alos in some areas the damn font is just way too big on the headers.

- Collapse -
It does appear to me that the blue text
Oct 14, 2011 7:33PM PDT

has become a bit pale and pastel while the headline bar...or whatever it's called...has become bright and bold. While the blue text is readable to me, I wouldn't mind if was a bit bolder or deeper hued.

- Collapse -
It should be possible.
Oct 14, 2011 8:01PM PDT

If fonts are defined in global CSS files it should be possible to change the font relatively easily to something more common.

It was mentioned above that one of the fonts is Museo Slab. I've never heard of that and don't see it in my Fonts folder in my Win 7 Control Panel. I doubt my older XP system has it either.

If that's right then I can see that using non-standard fonts can cause problems because if the OS doesn't have it installed then the OS chooses something else. It's always a risk when designing web pages to choose a font that all visitors have installed. Otherwise such problems as these can result.

Mark

- Collapse -
Logical
Oct 15, 2011 12:25AM PDT

That sounds plausible.

It should be easy to determine if it is indeed the cause.

Joe Randolph
Snapshot2

- Collapse -
To Mark
Oct 17, 2011 6:54AM PDT
- Collapse -
Ahh, very interesting.
Oct 17, 2011 9:27PM PDT

That looks better doesn't it Joe, but that's a great test you did and it certainly shows this is a non-standard font for many.

Hope you don't mind but I've reported you as offensive! Devil

Simply to alert Lee to what you found.

Mark

- Collapse -
Hard to read new font
Oct 12, 2011 8:29AM PDT

I agree that the new font is harder to read.

By the chance, it seems to me that Cnet has dropped out the calibration settings for the TVs they reviewed. I could not find them any where since the appearance of the web's new layout. Anyone can tell me if they are still there and how to get them? Thanks in advance!

- Collapse -
Have you tried the HDTV picture settings forum?
Oct 17, 2011 9:19AM PDT
- Collapse -
At the risk of getting stoned to death.......
Oct 12, 2011 8:50AM PDT

I LOVE LOVE LOVE the new font !!

¢ ¢ ¢ ¢
Carol

- Collapse -
Will my feedback get 'passed to the appropriate CNET team'?
Oct 12, 2011 9:10AM PDT

Or doesn't it count? Sad

Lee, in case you forgot what my feedback consisted of ........

I LOVE the new font.

I don't care if it's made larger (or even smaller), as long it stays.

In case the "appropriate CNET team" is short of help, I'm volunteering my services. Happy

Carol

- Collapse -
I'm glad you love it.
Oct 13, 2011 3:23AM PDT

I wish there was a setting to choose the font based on our profile. Then it's a win-win for everyone.

- Collapse -
Of course it counts, Carol!
Oct 13, 2011 6:34AM PDT

Especially yours. Seriously, good or bad it all going to the team.

So thanks for all your feedback.

-Lee