Thank you for being a valued part of the CNET community. As of December 1, 2020, the forums are in read-only format. In early 2021, CNET Forums will no longer be available. We are grateful for the participation and advice you have provided to one another over the years.

Thanks,

CNET Support

General discussion

Netbook vs Windows 7

Jun 1, 2009 2:12AM PDT

Windows 7 will be released in a few months.

Would a netbook be powerfull enough to run it?

I am about to buy a netbook but would not like to be stuck with Windows XP which will soon be 2 generations old.

Should I buy now or wait a few months for netbooks that will be powerfull enough to run the new OS? I am in no rush. I can easily wait for a few more months.

Discussion is locked

- Collapse -
A few points
Jun 1, 2009 2:28AM PDT

Windows 7 is a bit more than a few months away; more realistically will be just in time for the Holiday Season. Windows 7 seems to have gotten great reviews by users who have tested pre-release versions of the OS on their netbooks. That being said, Windows 7 will work just fine on most netbooks.

More good news- Microsoft announced last Friday that Windows 7 Starter Edition will allow for unlimited applications running simultaneously, as opposed to previous versions which were limited to 3 applications at a time. More on that here: http://windowsteamblog.com/blogs/windows7/default.aspx

Cheers,
Jeff
Windows Outreach Team

- Collapse -
a Few more points
Jun 1, 2009 5:13AM PDT

Win7 needs a 1GHz CPU, 1GB RAM, 16GB HDD space and DX 9 Graphics (for Aero) => most current Netbooks will run Win7 just fine

- Collapse -
tested on msi Wind
Jun 1, 2009 9:58AM PDT

runs fine, no noticeable lag in performance when running Aero but the processing is definitely up there, might be better to go the Basic theme

- Collapse -
Netbook vs Windows 7
Jul 10, 2009 12:48PM PDT

I'm running Windows 7 Ultimate RC1 on my Asus Eee PC 1000H (N270 Intel Atom cpu, 2 GB RAM, 160 GB HDD). It runs better than XP. It's significantly different from XP, so choose whichever you prefer. You can also get netbooks with some flavor of Linux. If that's good for you, choose that. They all work very well as long as you don't need OS_specific apps, e.g., MS Office requires Windows because no other OS has an app that can save MS Office 2003/2007 formatting. The open source word processors can deal with earlier versions of MS Word without too much trouble, though.

When I taught school, I used my Eee PCs (I'm on my 3rd; I upgraded for screen size and the large HDD) every day and loved them. However, now that I'm editing technical papers full-time, I'm not terribly happy with the Atom CPU: too slow, sometimes even for simple tasks, and the screen resolution (1024 x 600) just doesn't make it.

I'm going to switch to a larger lightweight notebook, one with a 12- or 13.3-inch screen and minimum 1024 x 800 resolution. That will also get me a cpu that runs at least twice as fast as the Atom N270.

I may just spring for the most powerful 12- or 13.3-inch notebook I can buy, however, because the power and speed are suddenly much more important to me than the differences in price and weight. I just can't work well enough with a 10-inch screen, 1024 x 600, and an Atom N270.

- Collapse -
Runs fine on Acer Aspire One
Jul 12, 2009 3:16AM PDT

It feels snappier than XP..Ready boost actually works with Win 7 so app opening is snappy. It is convenient to use on Acer because left SD slot swallows the card completely so nothing is sticking out. I bit the bullet and opened up my macine to upgrade the memory to 1.5GB(the max unfortunately) and there was a noticeable improvement in performance.
This is a terrific unit as long as you use it for what it was designed for..email, word processing, powerpoint show and web browsing and the like. Don't expect any heavy lifting from this lightweight gem.(pun intended)

- Collapse -
I have the Asus EEE 900A
Jul 18, 2009 10:42AM PDT

I replaced the 1gb mem module with a 2 gb and replaced 4gb ssd hd with a quick 16gb ssd hd, it took longer to install Win7 RC 32 bit than I thought it would (about 3 hours) but after it rebooted it's lightning fast. I also have an acer aspire 5735-4774 that I maxed the ram 4gb and replaced the hd with same size but larger buffer 16mb and faster 7200rpm. Most people are shocked how fast both computers operate but what you'll see on the netbook is if you multi-task excessively it'll slow down, it's still much faster than when it had Win XP home but it does have the limitation if you're trying to move a file and watch flash video at the same time. These problems may be solved when Via launches the nano dual-core, it will force Intel to release the Atom dual-core (I have this too for a home desktop, very nice and fast for day to day activities.

- Collapse -
How are you going to deal with Windows 7's WinSxs issue?
Jul 18, 2009 1:31PM PDT
- Collapse -
I'm going to live with it
Jul 18, 2009 3:24PM PDT

My netbook has a 160GB hard drive so a file that might grow to 0.5% of the drive capacity doesn't concern me. It's currently at 4GB

- Collapse -
Above you wrote.
Jul 18, 2009 9:01PM PDT

"replaced 4gb ssd hd with a quick 16gb ssd hd"

The WinSxs would occupy 25% and on one machine here the WinSxs is now 12GB. What's the plan there?
Bob