HolidayBuyer's Guide

The CNET Lounge forum

General discussion

Net Neutrality protests, why????

by Nicholas Buenk / August 13, 2010 12:35 PM PDT

Jeeze, googles got an agreement out of verizon to protect wired, who'd have thought that would ever happen! And yet people are still complaining. Nothing gets done without pragmatism, and google has half one here and protected wired. They can work on wireless later. But that is a very different situation. Wireless is very bandwidth constrained and will never able to be free of needs of network management. The most we'll be able to do is stop carriers favouring certain companies content over others. And let them stick to managing by protocols.

Discussion is locked
You are posting a reply to: Net Neutrality protests, why????
The posting of advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks is prohibited. Please refer to our CNET Forums policies for details. All submitted content is subject to our Terms of Use.
Track this discussion and email me when there are updates

If you're asking for technical help, please be sure to include all your system info, including operating system, model number, and any other specifics related to the problem. Also please exercise your best judgment when posting in the forums--revealing personal information such as your e-mail address, telephone number, and address is not recommended.

You are reporting the following post: Net Neutrality protests, why????
This post has been flagged and will be reviewed by our staff. Thank you for helping us maintain CNET's great community.
Sorry, there was a problem flagging this post. Please try again now or at a later time.
If you believe this post is offensive or violates the CNET Forums' Usage policies, you can report it below (this will not automatically remove the post). Once reported, our moderators will be notified and the post will be reviewed.
Collapse -
My inner pragmatist agrees...
by minimalist / August 14, 2010 1:27 AM PDT

but the cynic in me knows that the free market apologists are smoking crack if they think that this will all sort this out without any regulation. The airwaves are just as much of a public resource as street right of ways. If businesses want to profit from public resources they have to give something back to the public.

I'm OK with letting it slide for right now because wireless broadband really is still a good ways off from being a real alternative to wired. But the FCC needs to watch the wireless carriers like a hawk and step in at the appropriate time. If they wait until wireless net access is as ubiquitous as wired broadband is now to do demand neutrality standards be met, the battle will already be lost.

Collapse -
Well...
by Nicholas Buenk / August 14, 2010 7:33 AM PDT

I think it's extremely unlikely wireless will ever catch up to wired.
There's only so much spectrum to share among all users in a cell. Note AT&T is suffering huge congestion problems, and according to reports. The average usage of their users is only around 200MB!!! Bandwidth on wireless is simply too scarce to be an alternative to wired.
Hence the carriers are implementing data caps.

Collapse -
AT&T is suffering huge congestion problems because they
by minimalist / August 15, 2010 6:36 AM PDT
In reply to: Well...

built out their network on the cheap, compressing the signals to hell and back to cram more calls and data onto fewer towers. AT&T sound quality is horrible when compared with Verizon, Sprint or T-Mobile. They may advertise they have "the fastest 3g network" but that network is spread so thin we all get to suffer together.

There is no reason we can't have net neutrality on wireless networks and let carriers manage their growth with data caps. What we are getting instead is a wholesale land grab from carriers who want to privilege their own content or that of their "partners". Once you dominate a market and control the pipes that deliver that market, all the net neutrality principles in the world won't give your competitors a fighting chance. The damage will have already been done. Don;t think for a second that Google and Verizon aren't keenly aware of this fact.

Collapse -
Another thing is....
by Nicholas Buenk / August 14, 2010 7:43 AM PDT

Data caps might actually be a way around this.
Currently, you know if you have an iPhone, the 20MB download limit over 3G for iTunes and AppStore right? And limit on skype and facetime etc from doing 3G voice calls... These heavy handed efforts to reduce network congestion (among many others on the cell tower end of the network I'm sure), wouldn't be necessary if users were charged by data. And the price of data caps were set at the rate necessary to discourage data use and keep it at a level the network can handle.
If the FCC enforced net neutrality rules on wireless. Data caps would be all the carriers would be left with to stop their networks becoming congested and unreliable (ie, like AT&T Silly )

Popular Forums
icon
Computer Newbies 10,686 discussions
icon
Computer Help 54,365 discussions
icon
Laptops 21,181 discussions
icon
Networking & Wireless 16,313 discussions
icon
Phones 17,137 discussions
icon
Security 31,287 discussions
icon
TVs & Home Theaters 22,101 discussions
icon
Windows 7 8,164 discussions
icon
Windows 10 2,657 discussions

The Samsung RF23M8090SG

One of the best French door fridges we've tested

A good-looking fridge with useful features like an auto-filling water pitcher and a temperature-adjustable "FlexZone" drawer. It was a near-flawless performer in our cooling tests.