Thank you for being a valued part of the CNET community. As of December 1, 2020, the forums are in read-only format. In early 2021, CNET Forums will no longer be available. We are grateful for the participation and advice you have provided to one another over the years.

Thanks,

CNET Support

General discussion

Need help for buying a digital video camera

Jul 14, 2007 9:21AM PDT

I need to buy a digital video camera but I don't know exactly which is the better for me. I want one that offers a good optical zoom without loosing quality and that have a good and a rapid auto-focus. I have see some ones and now I'm a little confused and don't know the better one. Two I saw that seems to look interesting are: sony dcr dvd-106E and JVC GZ-MG 130. If anyone can help me I would appreciate it very much!


Thanks!

Discussion is locked

- Collapse -
what are you planning to use the camera for?
Jul 14, 2007 12:32PM PDT

Do NOT get a DVD-based camcorder if you think you will do any editing.

- Collapse -
camera use
Jul 14, 2007 12:57PM PDT

I don't expect to edit video after recorded. Regards

- Collapse -
Thanks
Jul 17, 2007 12:20AM PDT

Sorry for posting outside the thread. Thanks for your attention, I think I will shoot for sony.

- Collapse -
(NT) Then buy whatever looks interesting.
Jul 14, 2007 1:36PM PDT
- Collapse -
what models?
Jul 14, 2007 9:33PM PDT

But in terms of image stabilization and a rapid and good autofocus what is the beste camcorder for achieve that? A dvd one or a mini dv? What models you suggest? Thanks

- Collapse -
(NT) The two you picked will work for you.
Jul 14, 2007 11:17PM PDT
- Collapse -
Which of these?
Jul 14, 2007 11:34PM PDT

In terms of features I said what camera you would choose among canon md-150, canon md-160, canon dc230 and sony dcr-dvd106E? Thanks

- Collapse -
Flip a coin...
Jul 15, 2007 11:40AM PDT

Honestly. If you aren't editing and you aren't expecting to move the video to your computer for uploading to the web (that falls under the heading of "editing"... and you aren't shooting the next Harry Potter movie, just pick one.

In the range of the camcorders on your list, the differences aren't that big - certainly not enough to spend a lot of time on... just get A camera and start capturing video. It isn't a big deal.

- Collapse -
What about dc230? And minidv?
Jul 15, 2007 11:53AM PDT

do you know if performance of dc230 is good?
By the way what mini dv camera you would buy if you want the features I already need? Thanks

- Collapse -
my requirements are different from yours.
Jul 15, 2007 2:07PM PDT

I would not waste my money on a miniDVD based camcorder. I like to edit - and I post stuff to the web at MySpace, YouTube and websites where much less compression is used. If someone GAVE me a DVD-based camcorder, I would recycle it be cause I would feel too guilty giving it to someone.

MiniDV tape based camcorders continue to provide the highest quality video image available and are affordable - as are the tapes. A Panasonic PV-GS320 (no external mic jack) or even a Canon ZR800 (has an external mic jack) would be a much better investment... but if you have no expectation to get the video into your computer for any particular reason, then it does not matter.

I have been using a Sony HDR-HC1 for almost 2 years. Before that is was a Canon Elura. I am currently looking at the Sony HVR-V1 or HVR-Z1, Canon XH A1 or Panasonic AG-HVX200. These cameras are very different than those you are evaluating. They will do everything you want - and much more... and they all have a couple of common items: They all do high definition and they all record to miniDV tape. That they all *can* record to an external hard drive is helpful, but a nice to have (external drive file format is like tape - not like the internal drive camcorders). The Panasonic also can record to P2 memory cards.

If I was in your shoes, I would probably be looking at the Canon ZR800 (to be fair, the PV-GS320, PV-GS85 and Sony HC96 are fine cameras too). Video is about 1/4 of the story... Audio, editing and lighting make up a big part of the important stuff. Of course, it helps to have a good story (even with family videos); characters/subjects willing to be filmed... but this is just my opinion...

- Collapse -
ZR800
Jul 15, 2007 9:14PM PDT

I've been looking in web and I found in cnet a review that says ZR800 has a problem in stabilization at maximum zoom.. That's why I put it a bit apart of my choices. By the way, ZR850 is better than ZR800 in this aspect?

- Collapse -
Most cameras will have
Jul 15, 2007 10:58PM PDT

stabilization issues at maximum zoom - that is because all the visual is magnified and the tiniest movement is very apparent. At 1/2-to-maximum zoom on any camcorder, you should be using a tripod.

The ZR850 does not have the mic-in jack that the ZR800 has.

- Collapse -
zoom/focus
Jul 15, 2007 11:32PM PDT

And between ZR800/850 and MD160, what's your advice? Thanks

- Collapse -
ZR800 and MD160.
Jul 16, 2007 3:24AM PDT

Looks like the MD160 does marginally better in low light... Both are miniDV; both have external mic-in... Optical zoom is the same 35x (by the way, whichever camcorder you get, turn digital zoom off when you get it - digital zoom is useless).

If you decide to go this route, remember, you need FireWire to transfer video from the camcorder ("DV" port) to the computer - and *most* Windows based coputers don't include FireWire (Macs have had FireWire ports for years). Also, the camcorder manufacturers generally do not include a FireWire cable. 4-pin on the camcorder side to 4 or 6 pin (depending on your computer's port) on the computer side. If you don't have a FireWire port, they are typically easy and inexpensive to add. FireWire is not USB. The USB port is for transferring stills off a memory card in the camcorder.

Also consider an optional high-capacity battery; a sturdy tripod; sturdy case to protect your investment... and when you are ready, an external stereo or shotgun mic... like those from RODE or NRG - you *could* spend a lot more on the mic (Audio-Technica AT-822, AT-825 or Shure VP88 or similar) but that is not necessary in this camera range.

- Collapse -
Again between two..
Jul 16, 2007 4:19AM PDT

Thanks very much for your answers!!
Now I'm really between the sony DCR-HC47 and the canon MD160 because I found good reviews of the sony. Both has pratically the same price in shops near me, but I think sony may have a higher video quality and maybe the best choice for a future camcorder. Can you help me decide which is the better choice? Thanks

- Collapse -
No connection problem
Jul 16, 2007 4:22AM PDT

I have already a firewire port (I394) in my laptop, so no problem at that point.

- Collapse -
I don't think the HC47 has an external
Jul 16, 2007 7:19AM PDT

mic-in jack. I don't count the Sony proprietary "active interface" shoe (even though there is an adapter)...

By the way, if you use the camera's auto-volume level control feature (typically the default), any camcorder's built in mics will pick up noise - from the camcorder drive mechanism. This is especially apparent when there is not a lot noise... the mics are listening for noise to record - that is their job. Remember, they are co-located in the same body as the drive mechanism (whether hard drive, DVD or tape) just shows how sensitive they are. That is why one of the important things to learn to use is the manual audio level control... with or without an external mic.

The manual audio control will not eliminate picking up the extraneous camera noise, but the auto volume level circuit will not kick in when there is no (or only VERY low) noise in whatever environment you are recording.