back on its electric cars. It's a hopeful thought given the importance of transportation.
![]() | Thank you for being a valued part of the CNET community. As of December 1, 2020, the forums are in read-only format. In early 2021, CNET Forums will no longer be available. We are grateful for the participation and advice you have provided to one another over the years. Thanks, CNET Support |
Discussion is locked
back on its electric cars. It's a hopeful thought given the importance of transportation.
... Norway be the experimental lab for hydrogen for transportation.
It seems to me that as an energy source, hydrogen is a poor one. It always takes energy to get the fuel, the only bonus of this method is that the energy input is "free" -- being solar. But it has a niche application so this seems to be the best way to go about producing it.
Still, I can't help but wonder, if they're going to "harvest" methane from landfills to make hydrogen -- which is more difficult to store, etc., and harness a bunch of solar power to do the conversion, why not just look into ways to make methane as cleaner direct fuel source (it's pretty clean already) and use all that solar power to light a few homes vs. converting one fuel to another? I'm sure there has to be some method to this madness, but sometimes I do wonder if some just get too hyped on an idea that sounds good and keep going with it even knowing its limits?
We've, THANKFULLY, all but abandoned the notion of the all-electric car for now. Not that it might not be a viable option down the line, but in many ways it seemed too many were stuck on that idea and it hampered development of the hybrids. After all, hybrids are all the rage now, but they are a failure at that greenie goal of eliminating the combustion engine by 1990, 2000, 2010, 2020, 2030 .....
Hybrids seem like a good step forward, but there are many factors that could render them an economic or even an environmental disaster. Only time will tell.
Evie ![]()