I remember going there in the early days of Rathergate. They were going on and on about the wingnuts being so paranoiod and wrong and how Danny would PROVE the documents were real and rub the right's faces in it, etc., etc., blah blah blah.
I would have thought after that experience hara-kiri would have been in order. Yet, still they go on lying and lying....
 | Thank you for being a valued part of the CNET community. As of December 1, 2020, the forums are in read-only format. In early 2021, CNET Forums will no longer be available. We are grateful for the participation and advice you have provided to one another over the years. Thanks, CNET Support |
General discussion
More clueless Liberal blathering nonsense
1. Want to talk about ALL of the inefficient government programs?
2. Also want to talk about welfare, SSI, medicare and trillions of dollars of other ?wasteful? programs?
3. There are no lies and NO intrusions.
4. It?s NOT illegal. We can find many more scholars that say it is legal. If it were illegal, the screeching whine of the liberal machine would have it in court already.
5. Want to find out how many people have far more access to much more personal data than this?
6. Paranoia
7. Ridiculous paranoia.
8. Google already does this.
9. Abject ridiculous paranoia.
10. Un-American ??? National security is un-American?
Discussion is locked
1 - 30 of 38 Posts
- Collapse
- Collapse -
- Collapse -
Looks like more meaningless knee-jerk conservative blather to me -- now did that exchange really accomplish anything?
-- Dave K, Speakeasy Moderator
click here to email semods4@yahoo.com
The opinions expressed above are my own,
and do not necessarily reflect those of CNET!
- Collapse -
...secondly, it's called a "subject line".
- Collapse -
Conservative blathering nonsense" would survive? I've lately had far milder posts shut down after 3 and 1 reply respectively, and they were just quotations from the Boston Globe and some other mainstream news source.
This is the most blatant example of trolling yet, but it survives and prospers because it's on the Right side of the Forum.
Rob
Rob
- Collapse -
The most inflammatory Moderator picking on the subject lines of members he doesn't like?
- Collapse -
Even if another mod did it, you know what would happen.
- Collapse -
just because your on the recieveing end( not you per say josh) seems funny when its against blathering idiots some get upset.
wonder why
- Collapse -
We should all be tolerant of opposing viewpoints. Someone being intolerant might.....oh......accuse Duckman of trolling or something. I'd hate to see Dan do that.
- Collapse -
....just telling DM to "go away."
That's much more tolerant.
- Collapse -
....since DK had already posted saying that he felt the subject line was inappropriate.
"Go away" wasn't a followup to any moderator's admonition.
- Collapse -
Here we go again with the ''I don't know what you're talking about'' bit.
Not playing this time.
- Collapse -
I DO NOT KNOW WHAT YOU ARE TALKIHG ABOUT. I HAVE NEVER DONE THAT AND AM NOT DOING IT NOW! I RESENT YOU CALLING ME A LIAR!!!!!!
Take your "game" and shove it!
- Collapse -
if you question him to often he gets outraged and says theres an insult in there some where
- Collapse -
I only say I've been insulted when I've been insulted. Maybe you just insult people so often you don't realize you're doing it.
- Collapse -
maybe you just have a guilty conscience, always crying foul when you make an outrageous statement
- Collapse -
when you falsely accuse me of pretending I don't know what the @#$%&* you are talkiing about when I don't.
- Collapse -
....suddenly become incomprehensible to you. It's happened more than once, more than twice. I don't have a complicated writing style and other members haven't complained that they don't know what I'm talking about. They may have a slew of other choice words but "Huh?" isn't among them. My post seemed straightforward enough.
However I will take you on your word and apologize. I'm also willing to give this one more shot if I worded my post poorly.
Dan's post was in direct response to DK's comment about the propriety of DM's original post. It read to me as more of a rhetorical question than a request to have the post deleted.
- Collapse -
You made it sound like someone, most likely me, had told him to go away. So, not very clear at all. At least not to me.
There have been times, believe it or not when what you say is not all that obvious. That's when I question it. I do not pretend not to know what you are talking about.
- Collapse -
The ''Go Away'' post was in another thread, and addressed to another member. I was just referring to it for comparison purposes.
Pretending to not know what the other person is talking about is not ''playing cricket'' and I would not see the point in trying to debate anyone who does it. I'll take you on your word and do my best to be clear when I post.
Now, about that ''Long and Winding Road'' single....... Jonah was right, it was an A-side, their last before the breakup as a matter of fact.
- Collapse -
It's intended to inflame, rather than promote rational discussion. And I repeat what I've long said -- had conservatism ruled this country through its history, we'd still be a British colony, with a slave-based economy (except Britian became more liberal, too...)
-- Dave K, Speakeasy Moderator
click here to email semods4@yahoo.com
The opinions expressed above are my own,
and do not necessarily reflect those of CNET!
- Collapse -
Back to the History books for you.
Maybe if you clicked on Dman's link..wait... What am I saying...
CNET Forums
Operating Systems
Software
Electronics & Gadgets
Hardware
Tablets & Mobile Devices
General Help
Roadshow Autos
Chowhound
Comic Vine
GameFAQs
GameSpot
Giant Bomb
TechRepublic