Speakeasy forum

General discussion

Maybe he should deploy land mines

Discussion is locked
You are posting a reply to: Maybe he should deploy land mines
The posting of advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks is prohibited. Please refer to our CNET Forums policies for details. All submitted content is subject to our Terms of Use.
Track this discussion and email me when there are updates

If you're asking for technical help, please be sure to include all your system info, including operating system, model number, and any other specifics related to the problem. Also please exercise your best judgment when posting in the forums--revealing personal information such as your e-mail address, telephone number, and address is not recommended.

You are reporting the following post: Maybe he should deploy land mines
This post has been flagged and will be reviewed by our staff. Thank you for helping us maintain CNET's great community.
Sorry, there was a problem flagging this post. Please try again now or at a later time.
If you believe this post is offensive or violates the CNET Forums' Usage policies, you can report it below (this will not automatically remove the post). Once reported, our moderators will be notified and the post will be reviewed.
Collapse -
(NT) And then he wouldn't be sued?

In reply to: Maybe he should deploy land mines

Collapse -
(NT) I can't imagine a jury finding him guilty of anything

In reply to: Maybe he should deploy land mines

Collapse -
I can

In reply to: I can't imagine a jury finding him guilty of anything

David Hardy, had argued that illegal immigrants did not have the same rights as U.S. citizens

I feel justified in taking matters into my own hands.



He can/will do things to illegal aliens that he can't do to US citizens AND he is above the law.

He's not saying he didn't do what they say, just that he thinks he should be able to.

Weren't people told not to confront illegals...just notify the authorities?


Perhaps he could sue the government.
Collapse -
might have been easier

In reply to: Maybe he should deploy land mines

if he had just shot and buried them.

Collapse -
easier ?

In reply to: might have been easier

To kill them?

Might be more difficult to go to sleep at night.

Collapse -
they

In reply to: easier ?

wouldn't be in court now, would they?

Collapse -
No they would be in the ground

In reply to: they

And he could be in court, charged with murder.

Remember the 2 agents, they had to wait until the President set them free.

Approx 12,000 were reported by him previously, he kills the next 3 or 4, then he reports the next 12,000?

Do you think the next 12,00 know about the 3 or 4 that he killed as a warning...since he buried the evidence?

Or is he going to put a sign up?

"I murdered the last 3 that came through."

Collapse -
LMAO

In reply to: No they would be in the ground

you do look hard for an argument, don't you? Sarcasm, Google it.

Collapse -
Why suggest killing them?

In reply to: LMAO

What does that solve?

Collapse -
took your advice, looked up sarcasm,

In reply to: LMAO

intended to taunt its target.

And you say

"I do look hard for an argument"

I don't have to look far?

you should Google hypocrite


Got other things to do.
Collapse -
whoosh.........

In reply to: took your advice, looked up sarcasm,

right over your head.

Collapse -
(NT) Then Clays post went over YOUR head

In reply to: whoosh.........

Collapse -
haha

In reply to: Then Clays post went over YOUR head

nope

Collapse -
(NT) Enjoying the ride?

In reply to: haha

Collapse -
ask JP

In reply to: Enjoying the ride?

I am not on the ride

Collapse -
Must be...

In reply to: whoosh.........

Must be darned cold up there, you pulled his leg and it broke off (grin).

Collapse -
Freezing

In reply to: Must be...

Happy
Collapse -
Sarcasm difficult to convey with keyboard

In reply to: Freezing

Collapse -
Not at all

In reply to: Sarcasm difficult to convey with keyboard

Collapse -
That's what I use

In reply to: Not at all

oldie& goody didn't/doesn't, and neither did you, in your OP

Collapse -
Yep, I've used it myself, after I saw

In reply to: Not at all

it here once.

The other way: "If it's on SE, it's sarcastic." Happy

Collapse -
Response

In reply to: Not at all

Collapse -
like it said

In reply to: Sarcasm difficult to convey with keyboard

in the lesson on sarcasm, IF you have to tell them it's sarcasm then it isn't.

Collapse -
RE: IF you have to tell them it's sarcasm then it isn't.

In reply to: like it said

when you said

you do look hard for an argument, don't you? Sarcasm, Google it.

If you weren't being sarcastic, why tell me to Google sarcasm?

No one can have an argument with their self, it requires at least one other person.

Are you my "other person" or am I yours?


PS. Don't pay attention to Ed.

Collapse -
Since

In reply to: Maybe he should deploy land mines

no-one is now discussing the original post, but instead are batting back and forth about the English language, I am locking this thread.

Sorry.

Mark

Popular Forums

icon
Computer Newbies 10,686 discussions
icon
Computer Help 54,365 discussions
icon
Laptops 21,181 discussions
icon
Networking & Wireless 16,313 discussions
icon
Phones 17,137 discussions
icon
Security 31,287 discussions
icon
TVs & Home Theaters 22,101 discussions
icon
Windows 7 8,164 discussions
icon
Windows 10 2,657 discussions

SMART HOME

This one tip will help you sleep better tonight

A few seconds are all you need to get a better night's rest.