General discussion

Maybe Dan Quayle wasn't so bad?

Discussion is locked
Follow
Reply to: Maybe Dan Quayle wasn't so bad?
PLEASE NOTE: Do not post advertisements, offensive materials, profanity, or personal attacks. Please remember to be considerate of other members. If you are new to the CNET Forums, please read our CNET Forums FAQ. All submitted content is subject to our Terms of Use.
Reporting: Maybe Dan Quayle wasn't so bad?
This post has been flagged and will be reviewed by our staff. Thank you for helping us maintain CNET's great community.
Sorry, there was a problem flagging this post. Please try again now or at a later time.
If you believe this post is offensive or violates the CNET Forums' Usage policies, you can report it below (this will not automatically remove the post). Once reported, our moderators will be notified and the post will be reviewed.
Comments
- Collapse -
Re:Maybe Dan Quayle wasn't so bad?
That's presumably what Colin Powell had in mind in "My American Journey" when he wrote, "I am angry that so many of the sons of the powerful and well placed . . . managed to wrangle spots in Reserve and National Guard units."

Hmmmmm.....I wonder why nobody has asked him about that statement and whether he stands by it today.

Even Bush I has admitted that selecting Quayle was a mistake. In fact, it may have helped cost him the election in '92. I knew people who said they were voting for Clinton not because they liked him or because they disliked Bush, but because they feared that something would happen to Bush and we'd end up with President Quayle.

President Quayle, yikes.

Quayle smarter than Dubya, double yikes.
- Collapse -
Yes, he was. -nt

.

CNET Forums