Thank you for being a valued part of the CNET community. As of December 1, 2020, the forums are in read-only format. In early 2021, CNET Forums will no longer be available. We are grateful for the participation and advice you have provided to one another over the years.

Thanks,

CNET Support

General discussion

MacBook wait or Buy?

Apr 14, 2007 4:13AM PDT

I was hoping to get a macbook (black) along with Leopard in June, but now Leopard is delayed until October and I need a laptop by September.. What should I do?
1. Should I considerbuying a macbook now and update to leopard later?
2. will the macbook run leopard efficiently?
3.Or should I wait until june 11, does anybody know if an updated version of the macbook is coming any time soon? I wouldn't want to buy a macbook now and a few months later learn that a new one just came out.
4. Also I heard somethings about the grafics card and the screen are not very good, im not a gamer should i be bothered about this?

I would appreciate any advice
thank yo

Discussion is locked

- Collapse -
Same Problem?
Apr 14, 2007 6:07AM PDT

I have the same problem, I think I'm just going to buy the Black Macbook now and go with Tiger. It's been around for awhile I guess so it probaly has all the bugs worked out. I think they had the same problem when Vista was relased. You're also right about the graphics card. It basically sucks, ok for most things, but with only 64mb of video memory, it just seems wrong to me to put such a low end graphics card, into such a nice notebook. The screen I think is about the perfect size. It's glossy though, so some may be again't that. Over all the Black Macbook is a very good laptop in my eyes. I'd buy it know and what for Apple to work the kinks out of Leopard.

- Collapse -
more on Tiger
Apr 14, 2007 8:16AM PDT

I didn't mention it before but I made the switch, XP to Tiger! with an iMac still on power PC though not intel. Tiger is amazing! if you are coming from a windows platform like I did a while back... just imagine not having to update antivirus software! not having antivirus software! you dont need it... hardly any crashes... and if something does crash every other app. that is open just runs smoothly. Also it is very easy to use in my opinion.

- Collapse -
Awesome, I'm a switcher also!
Apr 14, 2007 9:44AM PDT

I'm also switching from XP to Tiger. I bought a PC last year, but relaized I wanted a Mac. So this Black MacBook is going to be my first Mac. And from playing around with Tiger in the stores a I love it. I love not having to update antivirus software, not scans for problems that slow my PC down. IT'S AWESOME!!!!!!

- Collapse -
My Silver Mac Pro
Apr 20, 2007 8:46PM PDT

I switched about theww months ago to the silver MAC Pro. (OS X). I love it. You're right no need for virus software. The only thing I wish were different is the delete button which only works one way as opposed to Windows which works two ways. I am a happy convert though.

- Collapse -
Deleting the other way
Apr 21, 2007 1:16AM PDT

It will delete the other way if you hit the "fn" key too.

- Collapse -
Deleting the other way
Apr 21, 2007 9:42PM PDT

Thanks!! IO read most of the lit about it and must have overlooked that. Thanks very much
Jon

- Collapse -
Deleting trick
Apr 22, 2007 9:24AM PDT

Well, to tell you the truth, I just saw this tip again recently. I seem to recall being aware of it years ago, but I never got into the habit of using it! I'm going to try to change that, but I'm an old dog...

- Collapse -
NOT! - - Apple's been releasing security updates
Apr 23, 2007 3:45AM PDT
- Collapse -
yeah, but so?
Apr 25, 2007 10:01AM PDT

I heard somewhere that Apple held a conference with hackers. It was a challenge to see who could take over a mac via the operating system. They failed. They then allowed them to try to exploit other programs to get to the system. After hours and hours, ONE guy (out of, like, 30) managed to get in through SAFARI. But anyone who uses the internet and actually knows his computer backwards and forwards knows that OEM browsers rarely meet the demand for security and functionality anyway. Go Firefox!

I have no idea about the BS factor, but its from a reliable source that is always right about everything he knows. He even predicted, months ahead, that the Nintendo DS was going to be all over the PSP like a bad itch. Same goes for Wii/XB360 vs. PS3.

- Collapse -
So why?
Apr 25, 2007 11:02AM PDT

If that's the case, then why go to the trouble of releasing them?

A couple of years ago, it was practically unheard of for Apple to release security patches. Now this month, they released a bunch more. Why?

- Collapse -
Um, what are you talking about?
Apr 25, 2007 11:52AM PDT

Apple has been releasing security patches ever since OS X came out. Isn't it better to correct shortcomings BEFORE they can be exploited? And, rather than a bunch, they've only had one security patch release this month. It came out on the 19th. Actually, they release one about every month. You can see the release dates here:

http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=61798

- Collapse -
Same page!
Apr 25, 2007 12:00PM PDT

I see you were looking at the same page I was. I'm still trying to figure out how you got a "bunch" of updates in the last month out of that. I see one security update and one firmware update for the new Airport Base Station.

Go to this link if you want to see that they've been doing them for years:

http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=25631

- Collapse -
I see more than one
Apr 25, 2007 10:25PM PDT

There are actually about 60 released since 2005. But I'll let you count them to get an exact number. And yes, you're right there were only two for this month. It was March I was referring to. That's six in the last two months. A record for Apple.

And no, Apple shouldn't need security updates. It's an invulnerable system, at least according to some of you fanboys. I don't remember security patches made for OS9. Now why is that?

(chuckle)

- Collapse -
I see more than one
Apr 25, 2007 10:27PM PDT

There are actually about 60 released since 2005. But I'll let you count them to get an exact number. And yes, you're right there were only two for this month. It was March I was referring to. That's six in the last two months. A record for Apple.

And no, Apple shouldn't need security updates. It's an invulnerable system, at least according to some of you fanboys. I don't remember security patches made for OS9. Now why is that?

(chuckle)

- Collapse -
Sorry for the double post
Apr 25, 2007 11:21PM PDT

-

- Collapse -
Security Patches
Apr 25, 2007 11:21PM PDT

So far, you are the only one calling OS X invulnerable. If you cannot remember any Security Patches for System 9, that can only be because of a faulty memory.

OS X is not invulnerable, but it is much less vulnerable than any Windows Operating System. There is a difference between a vulnerability and an exploit. MS appear to release SP's in response to exploits while the Apple releases them in response to found vulnerabilities.
I realize that sounds like a, as you would put it, fan boy statement but since the release of OS X there has not been one virus or exploit in the wild. Somebody, somewhere, must be doing something right.
At the CanSecWest competition last week, nobody was able to "own" either of the two Macbooks by the end of the first 24 hours. The organizers them lowered the bar which led to the discovery of an exploitable hole in Safari. Currently this is a vulnerability, it has never been exploited in the wild. Apple will fix it with a future Security Patch. Note also that this is not OS X, it is a program that runs on OS X.
Anyway you cut it, and for all your righteous indignation, OS X remains head and shoulders above any MS product when it comes to Security, a fact that its track record shows.

P

- Collapse -
You still didn't answer my question
Apr 26, 2007 1:07AM PDT

I wouldn't call you a "fanboy", mr.macfixit, but I think you know who and what I'm talking about.

Unless somebody discovered an exploit ahead of time, then why is it necessary to create security patches? To create one just for the sake of creating one? Or did an "event" occur and Apple reacted to it? It didn't just pop out of mid air.

I know on my MacBook, I still have to secure the WiFi just like I would any Microsoft product. And when I'm in Finder and I click on the Tiger menu bar and see what software updates are available, they have "security" written all over them. They don't have it in there unless there's a reason.

- Collapse -
As a software author I can assure that I...
Apr 26, 2007 1:14AM PDT

Don't know everything about the software I wrote. I rely on user feedback to know there is something wrong. I'm not a billions dollar mega count team of developers and have to deliver "working" in short order. In fact there's a fair comparison between my short order software and a short order cook.

-> Let me get to the point. There is a discussion about what it would take to write "perfect" software. I'll skip all the stuff in that discussion save the one thing that would matter to us all. "No one can afford it."

Bob

- Collapse -
Absolutely
Apr 26, 2007 1:19AM PDT

< I rely on user feedback to know there is something wrong.>

Thanks, Bob.

And that's exactly my point. Something HAD to have happened out there for this to occur. These warnings are man-made. They don't happen out of thin air.
_

- Collapse -
Stay with it!
Apr 26, 2007 1:19AM PDT

This thread seems to be slowly degenerating into M$ vs Mac -- which, in the legal parlance -- is nolo contendr

- Collapse -
Ahh, I see where you are coming from now,
Apr 26, 2007 3:11AM PDT

there are people, organizations that do nothing other than try to find holes in other peoples software. Some are just real whizz kids (not age related) that take great pleasure in taking apart software to look for holes.
Usually, when they find one, they call Apple (in this case) and give them all the information regarding the hole. At this moment, the hole is just a vulnerability, a possible way in through the security wall. As details of the hole are not published by either party, it remains hidden and unused by the "bad guys"
Once a fix has been coded for the hole, an update to the program/service/whatever, is released and the patch applied without this particular hole ever being exploited. So there is not necessarily any "event" other than someone pointing out the problem. Apple encourages and acknowledges these people.
As Bob says, nobody can afford to employ enough people to sift through every inch of code to find any problems, but there are people who do it as a hobby!
BTW, Wifi security is equally important on any OS.
Perhaps if Apple stopped using the word "Security" and just called them Software Updates you would feel better.

That just about covers this subject for this post.

P

- Collapse -
Same answer for both posters
Apr 14, 2007 9:04AM PDT

If you need a machine now or before Leopard is released, go ahead and get one.
Tiger is fully functional and the Macbook will easily support Leopard.

P

- Collapse -
Bye the way,
Apr 14, 2007 11:31AM PDT

Welcome to the Mac side

to you both.

P

- Collapse -
ME 2!
Apr 20, 2007 8:24AM PDT

I was deciding whether I should purchase an HP or Macbook...but I've came to the conclusion that I'll go with the MAC! lol...Can't wait!!! Yeah, I had the same issue if I should have wait until Leopard comes out however, since it postponed (and I can't wait until then)I'll get the black macbook in one week! It's going to be my first mac...how exciting.

Wink

- Collapse -
A little wait makes sense...
Apr 20, 2007 1:38PM PDT

You mentioned waiting to until June 11 and I think that's a wise move. You never know what Apple might have up their sleeve for WWDC. But even if they don't bring out a new MacBook (I have no idea if there are any rumors floating about) the present machine should be fine with Leopard. I've had mine since October and it's just a stellar little machine. Regarding the screen, I really can't imagine anyone not liking it. I prefer the contrast and crispness of the glossy screen. Reflections are a non issue with me.

And even when they do bring out Leopard, it's generally a good idea to wait a month or two before upgrading. Even Apple usually needs some time to work out the initial kinks.

- Collapse -
Advice
Apr 20, 2007 3:07PM PDT

Erm, if u have more to spare, get a Macbook Pro instead. That will better support the upcoming Leopard OS with a better performance. Anyway, u should just get a Macbook now, u shouldn't wait, the Core 2 Duo processors in the current range of Macbooks are strong enough to support Leopard OS. And Tiger OSX is pretty reliable, because of the fully-built features and updates,rather than starting with a new Leopard OS with yr then new Macbook in Oct. So go and get 1 now. The latest version of Tiger is now 10.4.9.That is most relaible version, Leopard starts at 10.5.

- Collapse -
Wait til June
Apr 20, 2007 4:52PM PDT

I haven't heard many rummors about new MacBooks coming out right away, but there have been rummors about apple changing to a dedicated video card in the MacBook. Also I've heard rummors about LED back lit displays, which would be even more power efficient than the current MacBooks.

I wouldn't hold off on getting a new Mac because Leopard was delayed, Tiger is a really good OS. It offers most of the features of Vista, but it's been in use for over a year so the bugs are pretty well worked out.

- Collapse -
MacBook Now!
Apr 20, 2007 5:07PM PDT

Have you spoken to your Mac dealer? I did, the other day.

Their offer was really what I would have expected from a Mac Dealer: Sir, go ahead and buy now: as and when OS 10.5 (Leapord) is released, we will provide you with the upgrade for free!

- Collapse -
don't wait unless you are broke
Apr 21, 2007 3:58AM PDT

We had been waiting to buy (there is never a real rush with Apple products thanks to retail price maintenance, i.e no sales). Finally decided to pull the trigger last week on a White MacBook when we were offered a 14% corporate/bulk purchase discount on everything including the 3yr warranty. Amazing how much BETTER the lowend Mac is vs. my 7 year old Dell Latitude (which I felt was pretty good during its time). Everything JUST WORKS right out of the box1

Personally I would not wait for a software upgrade that may or may not be released in 6 months just to save $100 and change. You could be enjoying your Mac today and getting up to speed on the system features well before school starts. There will always be a reason to wait. Note- my advice would be different for a windows laptop as windows upgrades are notoriously problemati - but Mac OS upgrades are usually pain free. The current Macbook base model includes everything you need (former options like DVD burner are included) so it is hard to imagine that the next version will have some killer app or feature that you want/need

- Collapse -
don't wait on the OS's account
Apr 23, 2007 1:16AM PDT

I am running Tiger on my 7 year old Mac Cube and it runs pretty snappily. My main issue is disk space - my iPod has more space, requiring me to use an external drive for my iTunes library.

I think Leopard will run just fine on today's Macbook. That being said, if you are going to use graphics intensive software or wish to drive a much larger monitor, you might want to consider a macbook pro.