PC Hardware forum

General discussion

Longevity: Athlon 64 3400 or Pent 4 3.2?

by Mindriot / July 8, 2004 6:50 PM PDT

I am looking to purchase a notebook for college. I'm looking into a few offers for a solid work/gaming machine.

I have read reviews and looked at benchmarking tests that with the right memory (DDR400 3200?) The 64 will perform better in games than a pent3.2.

My question. Given the fact that games are always kicking up the system requirements, will the 2.2ghz speed of the 64 chip itself act as a limiting factor or should I just consider total system performance (better than 3.2ghz)?

Discussion is locked
You are posting a reply to: Longevity: Athlon 64 3400 or Pent 4 3.2?
The posting of advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks is prohibited. Please refer to our CNET Forums policies for details. All submitted content is subject to our Terms of Use.
Track this discussion and email me when there are updates

If you're asking for technical help, please be sure to include all your system info, including operating system, model number, and any other specifics related to the problem. Also please exercise your best judgment when posting in the forums--revealing personal information such as your e-mail address, telephone number, and address is not recommended.

You are reporting the following post: Longevity: Athlon 64 3400 or Pent 4 3.2?
This post has been flagged and will be reviewed by our staff. Thank you for helping us maintain CNET's great community.
Sorry, there was a problem flagging this post. Please try again now or at a later time.
If you believe this post is offensive or violates the CNET Forums' Usage policies, you can report it below (this will not automatically remove the post). Once reported, our moderators will be notified and the post will be reviewed.
Collapse -
Re: Longevity: Athlon 64 3400 or Pent 4 3.2?
by R. Proffitt Forum moderator / July 8, 2004 9:21 PM PDT

You've misread all the articles.

Let me toss them all away with this statement. -> Laptops are not desktops. Laptops are finely engineered units which you will not overclock or fiddle with.

As to the 64-bit question, I've witnessed the transition in the "workstation" AKA SUN computers and others from 32 to 64-bit and the changeover was much faster than anyone expected. If you go with the Athlon 64, you can run XP 64 now, and the XP 32-bit SP2 will use its externsions as well.

If you stick with 32-bit, my best advice is to not overinvest and to think that you are buying a two year machine.


Collapse -
game performance
by Mindriot / July 9, 2004 4:57 AM PDT

Thanks for the info. 64-bit looks even better now.

Now, as for 32bit gaming. No overclocking since I'm inquiring about the longevity of the actual processor.

Some top notch gaming laptops possess the Athlon64 processor because it seems to handle 32-bit gaming very well, easing the mem to chip bottleneck and utilizing a large on-chip mem cache.

Well, my question is simply this. Will the limited (2.2ghz compared to 3.2ghz) chip speed Itself present a wall or is it less relevant considerig overall system performance With the AMD?

Collapse -
I want to be confused?
by R. Proffitt Forum moderator / July 9, 2004 6:58 AM PDT
In reply to: game performance

If you want to be truly confused, look at the GHz of the Centrino and (non-HT) P4s. For rough comparisons, the Centrino at 1/2 the clock speed is as fast as the P4 at it's speed.

See if you can find benchmarks on this.

But for games, 2+GHz of any CPU and 1+GHz Centrino is usually more than ample. The real bottlenecks are the video card and possibly the hard disk.


Popular Forums
Computer Newbies 10,686 discussions
Computer Help 54,365 discussions
Laptops 21,181 discussions
Networking & Wireless 16,313 discussions
Phones 17,137 discussions
Security 31,287 discussions
TVs & Home Theaters 22,101 discussions
Windows 7 8,164 discussions
Windows 10 2,657 discussions


Help, my PC with Windows 10 won't shut down properly

Since upgrading to Windows 10 my computer won't shut down properly. I use the menu button shutdown and the screen goes blank, but the system does not fully shut down. The only way to get it to shut down is to hold the physical power button down till it shuts down. Any suggestions?