Thank you for being a valued part of the CNET community. As of December 1, 2020, the forums are in read-only format. In early 2021, CNET Forums will no longer be available. We are grateful for the participation and advice you have provided to one another over the years.

Thanks,

CNET Support

General discussion

Linux rootkit

Feb 22, 2010 8:33PM PST

Is this a first? Somebody hacked Linux before Windows? Never mind that it was on a phone:

http://news.yahoo.com/s/livescience/20100223/sc_livescience/hackedsmartphonescouldbeusedtospyonyou

In fact, they add, vulnerabilities in smartphones are even more dangerous because people carry them around at all times, making it easier for attackers to eavesdrop, track locations or even collect personal information. Also, features such as Bluetooth receivers and text messaging make it easier to deliver rootkits to phones.

Iftode and his colleagues recently demonstrated different kinds of rootkit attacks. For instance, the microphone on a smartphone can be turned on remotely using rootkits, allowing someone to listen in on anything going on around the owner.

Another attack uses a common smartphone feature: GPS receivers. A simple text message allowed researchers to track the location and activity of the owner.


All this on a Linux based phone, though the article did note that any OS is likely vulnerable to similar sorts of attacks.

Discussion is locked

- Collapse -
Tagville
Feb 23, 2010 12:03AM PST

Because of my bkgrd. and some other knowledge, I never could understand why people wanted these so-called smart phones. I understand the gee-whiz factor, etc., but you can only use them once in a while or rather sparsely as it all costs. This is one reason the services want you to use them, they generate revenue. Just when is enough, enough? Because, frankly I want a phone, a plain phone that works a good chunk of the time. All these new electronics, IMHO are so vulnerable and no I won't go into that. However, it doesn't surprise me that attacks are on the up tick and further, it hurts at least the one person using that device and that's as personal as it gets(think about it). -----Willy Happy

- Collapse -
Even so they can be convenient ...
Feb 23, 2010 1:28AM PST

I don't carry a 'Smart Phone' ... yet ... but I probably will at some point. I use a Palm TX all the time for scheduling, contact information and access to medical information. I use a cell phone occasionally, mostly as a way gaining freedom to be out and about when I'm on call. I find it EXTREMELY annoying that both the Palm and the Cell Phone have Bluetooth but there is no way to use the Palm to transfer information to the phone when I want to call a contact. The Palm only does that for GSM phones. I have about 7 different contact lists (email at home and at work, contacts in Palm, contacts in the phone, and a few more) that are hard to keep in sync. For me, the Palm is the more heavily used device. But if I'm going to carry both of them, why not have both in one package that can sync with at least a few of my other Contact lists? I don't desperately need the web browsing features of the 'Smart Phone', though the medical program I use has some interesting features available only on iPhone and Blackberry but not in the Palm version. Unfortunately, if you use the Smart Phone you have to pay for the online access even if you don't need/use it.

My wife used to have a Palm and a cell phone but she could never keep up with 2 devices, she always managed to leave one behind, so we ended up getting a Windows Mobile phone. She usually manages to keep the new phone with her. She occasionally remembers to use the calendar functions. Unfortunately, she really has not figured out how to use most of the other capabilities. We're paying a lot for a service she rarely uses. OTOH, at least she always has both the phone and the calendar when she needs them.

- Collapse -
Options or what is that
Feb 24, 2010 12:25AM PST

Your explanation is "exactly why" if it can be found on one device why not another. Fueled by competition, etc., you get into the "Swiss Army knife" contraption. Its tries to do everything as many know it really can't do all well. Its best that a device do something VERY WELL yet have some flexibility and that's not the case after some prolonged re-invent period. Its going to get to a point, where it'll wipe your nose, trust me it will after x-yrs. Happy For me, re-invent the battery to last 30-days, now that's a miracle on 1 charge.

ie: Playing game on a 2.5x2.5 screen(some small display), yeah have fun with that. I know users do, but really. -----Willy Wink