Speakeasy forum

General discussion

Lab errors could clear Landis

by PudgyOne / February 23, 2007 7:17 AM PST
Discussion is locked
You are posting a reply to: Lab errors could clear Landis
The posting of advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks is prohibited. Please refer to our CNET Forums policies for details. All submitted content is subject to our Terms of Use.
Track this discussion and email me when there are updates

If you're asking for technical help, please be sure to include all your system info, including operating system, model number, and any other specifics related to the problem. Also please exercise your best judgment when posting in the forums--revealing personal information such as your e-mail address, telephone number, and address is not recommended.

You are reporting the following post: Lab errors could clear Landis
This post has been flagged and will be reviewed by our staff. Thank you for helping us maintain CNET's great community.
Sorry, there was a problem flagging this post. Please try again now or at a later time.
If you believe this post is offensive or violates the CNET Forums' Usage policies, you can report it below (this will not automatically remove the post). Once reported, our moderators will be notified and the post will be reviewed.
Collapse -
Don't know if he's guilty or not but
by Steven Haninger / February 23, 2007 8:54 AM PST

but I have to wonder what percentage of law and rule breakers go free due to a questionable fact finding process. All it takes is for some slick lawyer to find a minor misstep and there can be no finding of guilt. I believe the mindset of "Make 'em prove it....never admit to any wrongdoing" is present in even young children these days. Honesty is no longer the best policy. It's considered to be a weakness and a vulnerability....and I'll add...thanks to what's become of our legal system. Sad

Collapse -
or it couldnt be that the french
by Mark5019 / February 23, 2007 9:33 AM PST

labs screwed up

Collapse -
Here's how the story reads
by Steven Haninger / February 23, 2007 10:27 AM PST
"The most critical mistake: the laboratory allowed two technicians to analyze both Landis' initial and validating urine analyses ? a violation of international standards, the Los Angeles Times reported. The same technicians cannot analyze both tests."

As such, there's no indication that the testing, itself, was done improperly. The quibble was with the redundancy process that requires different handlers. I presume that great pains are taken to insure the integrity of the samples and the way they are tested in order to prevent both cheating by the race participants and tainting of the samples later in some sort of espionage attempt by other parties interested in the outcome.

Now, if both tests came back negative and this discovery was made, it would be difficult to disqualify Landis. If both came back positive, evidence would be strong otherwise and a case could be made to require he forfeit his prize. As I see it, the implication is being made that the technicians could have been in on a plan to taint the samples because the same ones handled both....slim possibility, I would think. Now do you think if Landis could keep his prize even if he was doped but could get off on a technicality, that he would admit to cheating out of a sense of honesty? Well, maybe yes or maybe know. Do you know of any other criminal cases where someone might have gotten away with murder because of a mistake in the way evidence was gathered?
Collapse -
every time the french lost
by Mark5019 / February 23, 2007 10:32 AM PST

and landis won they cried boo hoo he was doped

to me its sour grapes

Collapse -
Story also stated
by PudgyOne / February 23, 2007 12:23 PM PST
The lab possessed documents clearly linking Landis to his sample, a possible violation of anti-doping rules requiring that all samples handled by a testing lab be anonymous.
Collapse -
In looking over the list of other "errors"
by Angeline Booher / February 23, 2007 10:58 PM PST
In reply to: Story also stated

..... that's the one that appears to be most troublesome. Not good to know whose samples are being tested.

There was a lot of disbelief that an American could win again. I recall that Armstrong was always under suspicion.

In light of that, it is unpleasant for me to accept that Landis would be so foolish as to taking something to enhance his performance as a win would bring extra scrutiny.

If he is guilty, then he has damaged the American team and the sport.

Speakeasy Moderator
click here to email

Popular Forums
Computer Newbies 10,686 discussions
Computer Help 54,365 discussions
Laptops 21,181 discussions
Networking & Wireless 16,313 discussions
Phones 17,137 discussions
Security 31,287 discussions
TVs & Home Theaters 22,101 discussions
Windows 7 8,164 discussions
Windows 10 2,657 discussions

Does BMW or Volvo do it best?

Pint-size luxury and funky style

Shopping for a new car this weekend? See how the BMW X2 stacks up against the Volvo XC40 in our side-by-side comparison.