Thank you for being a valued part of the CNET community. As of December 1, 2020, the forums are in read-only format. In early 2021, CNET Forums will no longer be available. We are grateful for the participation and advice you have provided to one another over the years.

Thanks,

CNET Support

General discussion

Kamikaze Kars

Jan 31, 2010 11:01PM PST

Anyone here driving one of these type of cars? Hard to believe Toyota wasn't more on top of this. What happened to this one family, and the driver a police officer, is horrible. Do people panic and forget to turn the key off or forget there's an emergency brake? These cars remind me of those planes WW2 pilots were sent off in, never expected to return.
=======================================
LINK

The 911 call came at 6:35 p.m. on Aug. 28 from a car that was speeding out of control on Highway 125 near San Diego.

The caller, a male voice, was panic-stricken: ?We?re in a Lexus ... we?re going north on 125 and our accelerator is stuck ... we?re in trouble ... there?s no brakes ... we?re approaching the intersection ... hold on ... hold on and pray ... pray ...?

The call ended with the sound of a crash.

The Lexus ES 350 sedan, made by Toyota, had hit a sport utility vehicle, careened through a fence, rolled over and burst into flames. All four people inside were killed: the driver, Mark Saylor, an off-duty California Highway Patrol officer, and his wife, daughter and brother-in-law.

Discussion is locked

- Collapse -
I agree, it is crazy, but...
Jan 31, 2010 11:13PM PST

if you have the presence of mind to make a phone call, can't you turn off the ignition? Or throw it into Park? That's what I always think when I see one of those runaway car scenes in a movie. A police officer especially should be able to handle this.

Too sad.

- Collapse -
forget to turn the key off or
Jan 31, 2010 11:15PM PST

forget to turn the key off or forget there's an emergency brake

turn key off..steering MIGHT lock (if turned too far OFF in panic situation)...loss of power steering and brakes?

don't forget...put vehicle in Neutral, then you still have power for steering and brakes

- Collapse -
that might solve it, but by...
Jan 31, 2010 11:19PM PST

...blowing the engine. Still, having a piston and rod with chunks of a head blasting through the hood might be preferable. Even if that worst scenario from a free wheeling engine in full race mode didn't occur, the resulting carnage in the engine wouldn't be pretty. Better to blow the engine than kill yourself and others.

I was thinking maybe a downshift, but most automatics today won't do it until the speed drops to make it safe on the engine, so that probably wouldn't accomplish anything on these cars.

- Collapse -
The engine would not "blow".....
Feb 1, 2010 12:40AM PST

the computer will cut fuel/ignition and limit rpm to just over 7K.The safest thing to do is put it in neutral and pull over.

It is hard to fathom though,how a CHP officer who's trained in high speed pursuit would fail to take action before the car reached triple digits and vaulted a Lexus 100ft through the air?

The driver said in the 911 call he had no brakes,forensics showed that he heated the brakes up so bad that the flex lines from the calipers to the frame's hard lines actually melted.When you add to that the fact the driver was having heavy duty marital problems,it gives rise to a scenario that sickens me.Don't ask how I know,I won't comment any further on that incident.

The current recall is due to gas pedal assemblies manufactured by an American company and installed on American made Toyotas,*** Toyotas are not involved.

- Collapse -
who's to blame?
Feb 1, 2010 1:39AM PST

If I buy a Chrysler product with a Mitsubishi engine in it, and it's an interference engine in which the timing belt breaks before warranty expires or before time for it to be changed, I don't blame Mitsubishi, I blame Chrysler. It's Chrysler I will be holding responsible for it. Just because some parts in a car may come from various sources, doesn't remove the responsibility of the badge it wears to insure the viability of those parts.

Furthermore, there's 3 possible problems going on which all seem similar. Some problems were mat related, some gas pedal related, but there's also allegations there may be some software related problem too, all leading to similar consequences.

It's good Toyota has a limiter built on for engine rpm. Hopefully it would continue to work in these situations, allowing at least the engine to be saved after high rpm during neutral, till the car can be shut off.

Hopefully this was not intentional due to marital problems as you imply, I suspect it's not.

Here's a look at the crash.
http://www.momlogic.com/2009/09/911_call_released_in_stuck_accelerator_crash.php

Here's a look at the pedals involved.
http://abcnews.go.com/Business/wireStory?id=8730525

I wonder why they didn't just attach the pedals at the bottom which would keep the pads from getting up under them? It looks to me like any sort of mat could get caught up under it!

Here's some poor guy in England been on the hook for blame over his Toyota accelerating out of control. I hope he gets all the legal complications from it straightened out now.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/8488377.stm

I wonder how many other drivers are carrying points on their license from this sort of thing which they don't deserve?

- Collapse -
from what I've read
Feb 1, 2010 6:41AM PST

seems the brakes were burnt up, so likely emergency cable wouldn't have done much good by then. Also Toyota has admitted brakes alone won't stop the engine at full throttle. Throwing into park, if it can be done while moving (some cars may have lockout against that) will only result in shearing off the pin or keeper. This particular model of car has some sort of start button that to turn off car must be held down for 3 seconds. Three seconds at 100mph is a long time. Maybe the driver did push the button and nothing happened because he didn't hold it long enough. The car was a "loaner" so the mats in it were there from the dealer who loaned him the car. Motortrend has a timeline on the whole Toyota problem and they claim in this particular case it's proven the mats were jammed with the pedal. I've not been able to find any info on internet about marital problems with this couple.

- Collapse -
Similar happened with some Audis in the 80's
Feb 1, 2010 1:56AM PST

As I recall, they just denied it and discontinued manufacture of those models without fanfare. Clearly the loose mats aren't good in combination with that curved pedal design but you've got to bury your foot in the floorboard to make them catch. How many do that regularly except Kamikaze drivers. There's quite often a shared responsibility for such accidents. I feel more for those in other cars who are just tooling along minding their own business. They're the most innocent victims. I've read of newer designs that cause brakes to override the accelerator and drop to idle speeds. If they work, that's good but another layer of technology that relieves a driver of their instincts and normal reflexes isn't always good.

- Collapse -
The Audi "unintended acceleration" todo...
Feb 1, 2010 7:47PM PST

...was due to a "problem"associated with the location of the pedals in relationship to each other, NOT to a defective control.

The Audi 5000 model to which you refer had the two (or three in the case of a manual transmissioned car) pedals in the same vertical plane; IOW, it was very easy to slide one's foot from the brake to the throttle for sporty driving; it also made it easy for an inattentive driver to depress both the throttle and brake pedals simultaneously and then compound the error by sliding onto the throttle alone. When Audi redesigned the pedal cluster to place the throttle lower than the brake, the "problem" went away. There never was a mechanical issue with the Audi. Interestingly, the Land Rover Discovery had exactly the same issue a couple of years ago; I remember our company telling our service techs to exercise great caution with those vehicles.

The warning we received about the Toyota models in question mentioned all the steps that an attentive driver should take: Place the car in neutral, step FIRMLY on the brake (no pumping the brakes) and steer to the side of the road. We were also told that turning the engine off is an option.

In the case of Toyota, however, I smell a coverup. Toyota insists that vehicles whose Vehicle Identification Numbers (VINs) begin with "J" - meaning cars made in Japan - are not at issue, the fact remains that the Lexus that was cited earlier in this thread is Japan made - as are all Lexus cars and trucks.

Toyota also decided to hint that their American supplier had somehow failed to make the throttle assemblies correctly, until the supplier noted that it used Toyota's materials, Toyota's designs and produced the parts to the letter of Toyota's instructions.

When all is said and done, I think that Toyota will take a massive PR and financial hit from all this - if only because they have decided to try to tapdance around the truth.

- Collapse -
Toyota insists that vehicles
Feb 1, 2010 8:10PM PST

Toyota insists that vehicles whose Vehicle Identification Numbers (VINs) begin with "J" - meaning cars made in Japan - are not at issue,

Because they used a different throttle mechanism?

The Latest Info for Owners and Shoppers

By reading the VIN, you might be able to see if your vehicle is not affected by the current recall. If your vehicle's VIN starts with the letter "J" (signifying that the vehicle was built in Japan with the Denso part), it is not affected by the recall. However, it is still a good idea to call the dealership to confirm that the recall does not affect you.

While misplaced floor mats can, in some cases, hold down the accelerator pedal, the most recent recall has stemmed from a gas pedal mechanism found in some Toyota models. This part is made by CTS (based in Elkhart, Indiana), and, in some instances, has been found to increasingly stick as it wears. Time, temperature and humidity conditions are thought to affect the problem, which is still being investigated.

Not all of the gas pedals in the affected models are problematic, because the mechanism is supplied by more than one vendor. In general, Denso of Japan supplies throttle pedal assemblies for vehicles built in Japan (hence, Japanese-built Scion and Lexus are not included in the recall) and CTS supplies parts for vehicles built in the U.S. and Canada. A visual inspection can easily distinguish the two assemblies.

- Collapse -
Ask yourself this....
Feb 1, 2010 9:39PM PST

"until the supplier noted that it used Toyota's materials, Toyota's designs and produced the parts to the letter of Toyota's instructions."

If the pedal assemblies made by CTS(USA) used Toyota's materials,design and specs,why then would the Denso pedals on Japanese vehicles which are also made to the same specs not be affected? The answer lies with CTS.

Above that,I can't say anymore because I work for Toyota and I'm privy to info the media and general public is not.Let's say Toyota bit the bullet and took responsibility for the whole mess.

- Collapse -
PR issues
Feb 1, 2010 10:07PM PST

We're already seeing other auto manufacturer's trying to cash in though many of those have had their own PR issues in the past...most of which relate to suspect quality issues. It took a long time for Honda, Toyota, etc. to develop a reputation for reliability and durability because, quite frankly, their early entries into the American market were just awful. But, they learned better what buyers really wanted than did Detroit....that being automobiles that outlived payment books. Some improvements have been made in US manufacturing and the quality perceived quality gap is closing. I'd hope they'd continue to focus on their own product quality. This could easily be one of them getting negative media attention.

- Collapse -
The two pedals compared
Feb 1, 2010 10:49PM PST
- Collapse -
Interesting history about fallout from the Audi problem
Feb 4, 2010 11:09PM PST

Over a decade to recover?! Surely it won't take that long for Toyota to restore confidence? I'm surprised it had such a long effect. One lawsuit has been ongoing for 23 years?

http://www.businessweek.com/news/2010-02-04/audi-1980s-scare-may-mean-lost-generation-for-toyota-sales.html

Volkswagen AG?s Audi luxury brand spent 15 years rebuilding U.S. sales after sudden-acceleration incidents in the 1980s almost wiped out demand, a possible sign of the difficult times Toyota Motor Corp. faces.

Audi?s U.S. deliveries plunged 83 percent by 1991 from their peak in 1985, following recalls of the German automaker?s 5000 sedan. A class-action lawsuit filed in 1987 by Audi owners seeking compensation is still being fought.

- Collapse -
Jeffrey Pepski (software problem?)
Feb 2, 2010 12:05AM PST

This is one of the more scary stories, although it ended safely for the driver. I can't see why he would lie about his experience, but if what he says is true, then it would indicate, along with others who have said similar, that there may be more to this problem than just mats and sticky gas pedals. At this point I think I'd turn my cellphone off completely if I was driving one of these suspect vehicles, just like they ask on those highly computerized airplanes.

Last time we were car shopping it was a choice between a Buick or a Camry for my wife. Mainly for the added luxury she decided on the Buick. Now I'm glad she did.

http://www.safetyresearch.net/toyota-sudden-unintended-acceleration/

Toyota has claimed that it?s impossible for electronics faults to occur without the system taking note, in the form of a stored computer fault code. But the experiences of many drivers belie that claim.

Jeffrey Pepski, of Plymouth, Minn., is the most recent Lexus owner to petition the agency to look at the problem. His SUA event occurred while driving at high speed, in which the vehicle accelerated to 80 mph. Pepski tried pumping and pulling up the accelerator with his foot ? to no avail. He slowed the vehicle to about 25 mph, to the smoke and smell of overheated brakes, shifted into neutral, and depressed the start/stop button, but the RPMs began to increase on the tachometer. Pepski shifted back into drive and his Lexus vaulted to 60 mph. Suddenly, the acceleration stopped. He stopped the vehicle, shifted it into park and depressed the start-stop button to turn off the engine. The vehicle shuddered to a halt.

Toyota blamed the incident of a floor mat ? despite the fact that Pepski?s vehicle was only outfitted with OE carpet floor mats, not the all-weather mats that are part of the recall.

?I was trapped in a runaway vehicle,? Pepski said. ?I was able to push down on the accelerator as well as push up the accelerator with my foot. If the floor mat had been the cause, I would have dislodged it and the acceleration I was experiencing would have gone away and that didn?t happen.?

Regardless of the causes, these incidents of runaway vehicles underscore serious control issues plaguing Toyota?s brake and acceleration systems. In its most recent investigative report NHTSA?s Vehicle Research & Test Center found that drivers would have a difficult time reacting appropriately to an SUA event for three reasons: Many drivers did not know that depressing and holding the ignition button will eventually turn off the engine after three seconds; many complained that the neutral gear position in the gated shift pattern was not immediately obvious; with the throttle plate open, the vacuum power assist of the braking system cannot be replenished and the effectiveness of the brakes is reduced significantly and that brake pedal force in excess of 150 pounds was required to stop the vehicle, compared to 30 pounds required when the vehicle is operating normally.

Adding to the control issues in Toyota and Lexus models is the lack of a brake-to-idle failsafe that many other manufacturers incorporate.

- Collapse -
Can you imagine this happening to a car?
Feb 2, 2010 12:25AM PST
- Collapse -
Many drivers did not know that depressing and holding the ig
Feb 2, 2010 12:31AM PST
Many drivers did not know that depressing and holding the ignition button will eventually turn off the engine after three seconds;

Am I missing something?...

Why not?..do they leave the car running "all the time"?
- Collapse -
could be other factors at work
Feb 2, 2010 12:52AM PST

A high revving engine will be producing some serious electrical current from the alternator and if that's enough to override the regulator, or fuse the DC converting diodes, there could be high voltage, ripple current from unregulated AC coming across the lines, causing computer glitches and even arcing in the power off button, keeping it from shutting down the vehicle.

I had two motherboards a few years back with those defective capacitors and experienced the intermittent type glitches caused by improperly regulated electrical current. I had a hard time discovering what was causing it, thinking it was software related at first. Only after hearing other stories that were similar involving the bad caps, pulling my mobos and looking carefully did I discover the cause was the improper electrical current causing all the problems.

The problem in that Lexus crash with the CHP officer and family was tracked down by NHTSA to the floor mats installed by Toyota dealer from whom the car was a loaner. Easy to do since the mats were fused to the accelerator pedal in the heat of the crash. Yet, there we find there is now another identified problem in the pedal assembly. Meanwhile there are others who say that CAN'T be what caused their problem, like that Jeffrey person, although he could be wrong if the spring isn't directly attached to the pedal. If it was then pulling back on the pedal would have solved a pedal problem, if it wasn't attached but just pushed against by the pedal, then the return spring could bind while he pulled the pedal forward and that have no effect on the throttle being stuck open.

- Collapse -
Never mind all that technical stuff
Feb 2, 2010 1:04AM PST

They were probably scared ****less going 100 mph, and 3 seconds would be like an eternity.

Put it in Neutral, THEN push/HOLD the button

Kamikazie makes it sound like, you think they did it on purpose, both the driver and Toyota.

- Collapse -
Literally it means "Holy Spirit", or
Feb 2, 2010 1:27AM PST

"Divine Wind". Pnuema in Greek is a word for "spirit" which means "air". In the NT the Holy Spirit is described by Jesus as "The wind bloweth where it listeth, and thou hearest the sound thereof, but canst not tell whence it cometh, and whither it goeth: so is every one that is born of the Spirit."

Of course in alternate use it's come to mean some contraption you are trapped in speeding to it's doom, taking you along with it. Seemed an apt description.

- Collapse -
RE: come to mean some contraption you are trapped in
Feb 2, 2010 2:32AM PST

Kamikazie Pilots were "trapped"?

I thought they went willingly, knowing what their objective was.

- Collapse -
what does intent have to do with it?
Feb 2, 2010 2:41AM PST

The end result is the same. That's what it points to.

- Collapse -
intent has nothing to do with it
Feb 2, 2010 3:12AM PST

and neither does Kamikazi.

You chose that word because the cars were made in Japan and/or made in North America by a Japanese manufacturer.

made a good headline for National Enquirer.

- Collapse -
so, you're going nowhere with this, right?
Feb 2, 2010 8:18AM PST

thought so.

- Collapse -
Blame the Mongols for the kamikazes.
Feb 3, 2010 5:37AM PST
Kamikaze (from kami: spirit or divine and kaze: breeze or wind) entered the Japanese language as a term to describe what happened to the Mongol armies of Kublai Khan (Genghis Kahn's grandson) when it attempted to invade and conquer Japan in 1274 and again in 1281:

http://asianhistory.about.com/od/japan/a/Mongolinvasion_2.htm

Japan's Miracle

They say that truth is stranger than fiction, and in this case, it's certainly true.

Just when it appeared that the samurai would be exterminated and Japan crushed under the Mongol yoke, an incredible, even miraculous event took place.

On August 15, 1281, a second typhoon roared ashore at Kyushu. Of the khan's 4,400 ships, only a few hundred rode out the towering waves and vicious winds.

Nearly all of the invaders drowned in the storm; those few thousand who made it to shore were hunted and killed without mercy by the samurai. Very few ever returned to tell the tale at Dadu.
The Aftermath
The Japanese believed that their gods had sent the storms to preserve Japan from the Mongols. They called the two storms kamikaze, or "divine winds."

Kublai Khan seemed to agree that Japan was protected by supernatural forces; he abandoned the idea of conquering the island nation.


So, what are the odds of weather playing a major role in the defeat of two invasions?
- Collapse -
Buick...Which model?
Feb 3, 2010 10:16PM PST
- Collapse -
LeSabre
Feb 3, 2010 10:41PM PST

We chose the 2005 Buick LeSabre instead of the 2007 Toyota Camry. Buick was at a dealer's lot the Toyota would have been from a fleet sale. Both were used and both had about 25K at the time. The Buick was also less expensive by a few thousand due to the fuel prices at the time.

- Collapse -
It took a book, consumer advocacy and time for Chevrolet
Feb 2, 2010 2:49AM PST

..... to act re: the Corvair. That snappy looking rear-engine beauty took surprisingly little of a rear-end nudge to start it on fire. It took too long for GM to face the problem.

The book, "Unsafe At Any Speed", prompted the beginning of some consumer protection re: automobiles.

My son's 'first new car out of college" was a Ford. When it hit 2 years old, the engine would suddenly and without warning die on the highway. By that time paint on a trim area began to peel. The dealer said he could buy paint to touch it up himself. However, they did replace a bunch of components. None of it worked. he traded it for a Toyota Celica.

I don't know how much Toyota knew and when it knew it, but I believe it has acted responsibly . The holding of sales of affected models cut into about 60 % of inventory.

Angeline

- Collapse -
That was 50 years ago, half a century.
Feb 2, 2010 2:53AM PST

Hopefully we've moved along further from those days. I drove a Corvair as a service vehicle at a garage. Great little car, very peppy, fun to drive. It did have a tendency to want to fishtail on a curve though. Too bad GM didn't fix the problem and keep it, that car was ahead of it's time. Air cooled and only one fan belt which was easy to replace. Easy maintenance on it.

- Collapse -
"Quality" and the crushing of the EV1
Feb 2, 2010 3:10AM PST

When VW and Toyota started making inroads into the American market, three things sold them--- price (before a high tariff), great gas mileage, and overall quality.

Through the years, except for a period of time for VW, the quality continued. After Honda entered the market, it also held its standards, For whatever reasons, American car companies could not reach their level.

Yes, the Corvair example was 50 years n the past. Over that time
Detroit didn't match the attention to detail and quality until much more recently.

(I think the car you drove was a Corvette, as I think you are too young for the Corvair.????)

it hasn't been that long ago that GM ordered all EV1 cars to be destroyed. Ridiculous!!!

http://www.ev1.org/

Angeline

- Collapse -
drove this
Feb 2, 2010 8:22AM PST