69 total posts
(Page 1 of 3)
Don't hold your breath.
She's using all the familiar tricks to delay and delay and delay.
Can you imagine that? She's using the legal process to
defend herself. The founding fathers would understand her sentiments completely. They were VERY familiar with stacked courts.
It's very telling that you did not complain about that when Bill & Hillary used this approach to the hilt, and they were dealing with a fair investigator.
Oh yes. She's not dumb enough to offer herself up to the mercies of a Democrat witch hunt. So sad for the left.
She's using delay tactics, not to
defend herself, but to put hamper the investigation. Surely you can see that.
I don't recall our discussing any issues like this during the Clinton administration, KP, do you?
Is it just as telling...
...that regarding the Clintons you called it "obstruction of justice" and this time around you're calling it "using the legal process?"
By "fair investigator" I assume you're referring to Ken Starr. ROFL!!
I find it interesting...
I find it interesting that an office John Nance Garner (VP under Roosevelt) once described as "not worth a bucket of warm p***." has become so important to some people not even in the U.S.that they go on-and-on about Palin's being nominated for that office.
BTW, a lot of history books changed that last word to "spit".
not even in the U.S.
Give it up
USA spreading Democracy and freedom around the planet.
China restricts what people say and read.
PS I posted the OP in Canada
I posted it for Canadians to read.
If you read it in the US
What do you want me to do
I'll tell you right now, I probably won't do it.
The China reference makes no sense. Who wants to restrict what you say and read? I said that I found the sudden preoccupation with the office by some to be worthy of note. Back when Gore held the office, I once heard somebody in D.C. joke, "Well, somebody's got to attend the funerals.". Comments about that office turned from jokes to constant attacks, and even by people living in other countries, and I commented on it. It seems to have put a bee in your bonnet.
RE: put a bee in your bonnet.
Perhaps it was the Pollen in YOUR bonnet
I think the new attention to the VP office...
... is solely due to the efforts of **** Cheney. I forget who it was, that I saw talking about him recently, but I recall the person mentioning that Dan Quale went to see Cheney when he was elected to help ease him into the office. Quale started out giving a review of the "traditional" duties of the VP office. Cheney was said to have politely interrupted Quale and told the former VP that he had an understanding with the new president and his duties would be different.
My personal opinion is that Cheney assumed as much personal influence in his office as some presidents have held during their whole tenure.
It was on Jon Stewart
I guess we should all be grateful then....
.....that nothing happened to Roosevelt while in office. I'm not a religious person but if McCain is elected I will be praying every single day for his good health.
Yes, I hope he is healthy too...
so that he can serve for a full 8 years and then be succeeded by Sarah Palin.
Hopefully nobody will try to do to him....
.....what one of Palin's favorite writers once wished would happen to Bobby Kennedy.
Maybe I'll start praying now, that the people of this country have more sense than to put her in a position of world power.
"...one of Palin's favorite writers"
Sorry, Josh, but I am afraid that's a lie. I wasn't surprised when Dan tried the Pegler connection smear, but for you to do it too is something of a surprise. Or maybe the lefty websites have just sucked you in.
A speechwriter of hers used a quote from Pegler ptraising small town citizens. That is the extent of it.
How shameful. The Obama gang can't make their case so they attack Palin. Who are they running against?
Her defense is that
she just says whatever is written and put in front of her?
At least she's not getting her speeches from cartoons.
Like Obama is.
Oh, and she hasn't been caught plagiarizing anything as Obama has (twice already).
It's not plagarism if the source gave you permission, Ed
He was "given permission" AFTER the fact...
so yes, it IS plagiarism. You are trying to sugar coat it, but it is what it is.
speeches from cartoons Like Obama is.
They teach you to steal from cartoons in speech writing class? I didn't know that.
Is that dog a speechwriter for Obama too?
That's what you're saying
Obama got his speech from a cartoon.
No matter HOW he got it...it was from a cartoon.
You are not making much sense...
Yes, he stole at least one speech that we know of from a cartoon. That is indisputable.
And he stole parts of one from Massachusetts Governor Deval Patrick. Supposedly, he got permission for that. Before or after he made te speech is unclear.
That is indisputable
Is that the pig lipstick cartoon?
If it is, I dispute it.
Please stop saying "people don't make sense" or "don't make much sense"
No. It is thh Tom Toles cartoon with theh long word baloon..
It was discussed at length here. But rather than respond reasonably you and your buddies chose to deride mea and post irrelevant "evidence" that I was wrong.
When someone doesn't make sense I will point it out. Sorry you don't like that.
When someone doesn't make sense I will point it out.
When no one makes sense, they don't understand your sense of humour,
You are way more determined than I would be.
I'd just cut them loose
Not that you care, but if you said
I don't understand what you're trying to say
That doesn't make any sense at all (or words to that effect)
You might not come across as being confrontational
Tell ya what...
You pay attention to YOUR posts and I will pay attention to MINE. I don't need your advice on how to post.
Yes, she has captivated the nation because
she can't think for herself.
Sure Dan! That's simply a lefty fantasy. Earth calling space.
I'm not sure what you're saying.
Do you think she approved the quote and the choice of authors?
Back to Speakeasy forum
(Page 1 of 3)