Thank you for being a valued part of the CNET community. As of December 1, 2020, the forums are in read-only format. In early 2021, CNET Forums will no longer be available. We are grateful for the participation and advice you have provided to one another over the years.

Thanks,

CNET Support

General discussion

Just for DaVe

May 7, 2004 1:36PM PDT

Discussion is locked

- Collapse -
Re:Just for DaVe
May 7, 2004 4:06PM PDT

Oh noooooo!

Actually a trial balloon for something like this was floated by Hillary (I think) toward the end of the first BC term ((I think). Can't remember the particulars, but it was aimed at Rush Limbaugh/conservative talk radio, and would have required everybody who spends more than a certain percentage of their time talking politics to be registered as a lobbyist and regulated. Or something like that. Darn it, I've been trying to remember the particulars for a while but can't retrieve them from memory.

DE

- Collapse -
Re: Just for DaVe
May 8, 2004 2:37AM PDT

Hi, DavE.

>>would have required everybody who spends more than a certain percentage of their time talking politics to be registered as a lobbyist and regulated.<<
While I don't agree with that (First Amendment), I personally think that Sean Hannity's show (which starts with a countdown clock to November 2nd and speaks openly of "Hannitizing the vote for President Bush") should be classified as an infommercial for the Republican party, which means that its sponsors are making illegal campaign contributions.

-- Dave K, Speakeasy Moderator
click here to email semods4@yahoo.com

The opinions expressed above are my own,
and do not necessarily reflect those of CNET!

- Collapse -
So you also think the same of MoveOn.org and Media fund...
May 8, 2004 4:51AM PDT

that is good to know Dave.

- Collapse -
Re:Re: Just for DaVe
May 8, 2004 5:11AM PDT
I personally think that Sean Hannity's show (which starts with a countdown clock to November 2nd and speaks openly of "Hannitizing the vote for President Bush") should be classified as an infommercial for the Republican party, which means that its sponsors are making illegal campaign contributions.

So you think programming sponsored by advertisers should be labeled an infomercial? What do you think about programs that actually PAY stations to carry their programs, like advertisers? I think, if the dancefloor were the courtroom, you could probably prove, technically at least, that Air America is an infomercial. What do you think?