General discussion

Judge Brown in the news again...

U.S. District Judge Who Presided Over Government Wiretapping Case May Have Had Conflict of Interest

Judge Anna Diggs Taylor Serves as Secretary and Trustee of Foundation that donated funds to ACLU of Michigan, a Plaintiff in the Case


Judicial Watch, the public interest group that investigates and prosecutes government corruption and judicial abuse, announced today that Judge Anna Diggs Taylor, who last week ruled the government?s warrantless wiretapping program unconstitutional, serves as a Secretary and Trustee for a foundation that donated funds to the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) of Michigan, a plaintiff in the case ACLU et al. v. National Security Agency. Judicial Watch discovered the potential conflict of interest after reviewing Judge Diggs Taylor?s financial disclosure statements, available on Judicial Watch?s Internet Site, www.judicialwatch.org.

According to her 2003 and 2004 financial disclosure statements, Judge Diggs Taylor served as Secretary and Trustee for the Community Foundation for Southeastern Michigan (CFSEM). She was reelected to this position in June 2005. The official CFSEM website states that the foundation made a ?recent grant? of $45,000 over two years to the ACLU of Michigan, a plaintiff in the wiretapping case. Judge Diggs Taylor sided with the ACLU of Michigan in her recent decision.

According to the CFSEM website, ?The Foundation?s trustees make all funding decisions at meetings held on a quarterly basis.?


Can't help but wonder why the mainline media (excepting Fox who has mentioned it) hasn't got excited about it and plastered it on their front pages and talk shows (usually called CNN or CBS or ABC "news casts"). They certainly didn't hesitate at the briefest mention regarding a possible conflict with Alito or with a couple of conservative Supreme Court Justices (although they reacted similarly regarding Ginsberg -- they didn't think it important enough to mention).
Discussion is locked
Follow
Reply to: Judge Brown in the news again...
PLEASE NOTE: Do not post advertisements, offensive materials, profanity, or personal attacks. Please remember to be considerate of other members. If you are new to the CNET Forums, please read our CNET Forums FAQ. All submitted content is subject to our Terms of Use.
Reporting: Judge Brown in the news again...
This post has been flagged and will be reviewed by our staff. Thank you for helping us maintain CNET's great community.
Sorry, there was a problem flagging this post. Please try again now or at a later time.
If you believe this post is offensive or violates the CNET Forums' Usage policies, you can report it below (this will not automatically remove the post). Once reported, our moderators will be notified and the post will be reviewed.
Comments
- Collapse -
Will wonders never cease...

the NYT did mention it way down the page under "Other News" http://www.nytimes.com/ -- This comes as a real surprise!

The Houston Chronicle certain.ly didn't find space for it although they sure didn't hesitate to fill their pages with her decision followed by their editorial bashing Bush. This comes as no surprise at all!

- Collapse -
(NT) (NT) Judge Brown ??
- Collapse -
Sorry about that, I was looking at another...
- Collapse -
I knew that.

But there could be some here that will say you have NO credibility because you made a mistake.

- Collapse -
(NT) (NT) those who claim that have no credibillity
- Collapse -
(NT) (NT) No...it was a take-off on the TV show.
- Collapse -
Notice how not only the liberal media ignores it...

but so too do the liberals here in SE who were so quick to stomp their feet and waggle their fingers over Alito and the un-named Supreme Court Justices (and they also ignored Ginsberg's conflicts of interest too).

I guess that the old "if I don't see it and simply turn away from it and ignore it, it doesn't exist" philosophy of the left is demonstrated once again.

- Collapse -
Yeah ...

... duck hunting with the Vice President is SOOOOOOOOOOOOO much more damning than political activism on behalf of one of the plaintiffs!

Evie Happy

- Collapse -
Wasn't that Quail? I don't think they have...

...any ducks down there where Cheney was hunting....except in someones tank in South Texas.

- Collapse -
Actually it was duck hunting ...

... with Scalia, he was quail hunting at the time of the accident. TTBOMK, no judges were along for that trip Wink

Evie Happy

- Collapse -
(NT) (NT) Oh...OK...I didn't know there were two incidences.
- Collapse -
Just FYI

Here is a Google search on Cheney's hunting trip with Scalia:

http://www.google.com/search?q=cheney+scalia+hunt

It was known for some time that this Judge Diggs Taylor was on this case. Where was the ever vigilant media protecting American's right to know and right to an unbiased judiciary in this case? Political activism on behalf of a plaintiff (supporting their cause) in a case before them is surely more disconcerting than maintaining a casual friendship with a plaintiff that is irrelevant to the point of law in contention.

Evie Happy

CNET Forums