Speakeasy forum

Praise

Jim Acosta...the Ultimate in Stupid

I never thought I would see the day when I would be praising this idiot...BUT

Today he made a news video walking next to a steel wall on the border...he talked about how nobody was rushing the wall, there were businesses in the background nearby that he mentioned, and then said it was 'very tranquil'....

I guess the ultimate stupid didn't realize that he was making Trump's point FOR him...…….WALLS WORK.

Post a reply
Discussion is locked
You are posting a reply to: Jim Acosta...the Ultimate in Stupid
The posting of advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks is prohibited. Please refer to our CNET Forums policies for details. All submitted content is subject to our Terms of Use.
Track this discussion and email me when there are updates

If you're asking for technical help, please be sure to include all your system info, including operating system, model number, and any other specifics related to the problem. Also please exercise your best judgment when posting in the forums--revealing personal information such as your e-mail address, telephone number, and address is not recommended.

You are reporting the following post: Jim Acosta...the Ultimate in Stupid
This post has been flagged and will be reviewed by our staff. Thank you for helping us maintain CNET's great community.
Sorry, there was a problem flagging this post. Please try again now or at a later time.
If you believe this post is offensive or violates the CNET Forums' Usage policies, you can report it below (this will not automatically remove the post). Once reported, our moderators will be notified and the post will be reviewed.
Collapse -
RE:I never thought I would see the day

In reply to: Jim Acosta...the Ultimate in Stupid

Collapse -
"now in agreement with everything he says"

In reply to: RE:I never thought I would see the day

not hardly....

As for this: "Murderers, rapists, drug dealers AND gang members by the thousands and the community is quite safe?" Obviously, NOT IN THIS COMMUNITY because a WALL is there to stop it, JP.

"OCCASIONALLY" means just that...…...a WALL is to SLOW DOWN the migration and direct them to areas where a wall CAN'T be put making MANPOWER available to stop them. The wall was never meant to anybody with a brain to STOP it completely, just like a door to your house won't stop a criminal from coming in through a window of opportunity instead.

As if you don't know this already...…..

Collapse -
RE:NOT IN THIS COMMUNITY because a WALL is there to stop it,

In reply to: "now in agreement with everything he says"

Like I said in the post below

which was next to a 3 ft high chain link fence (a fence a 6 year old could easily climb over)

Collapse -
RE:.a WALL is to SLOW DOWN

In reply to: "now in agreement with everything he says"

Word on the street is...another caravan is forming in Honduras at the present time.

Coming on foot.

Can't go much SLOWER than that.

Start massing the troops on the US border?

Time to revive Paul Revere?

THE MEXICANS ARE COMING!!!!!THE MEXICANS ARE COMING!!!!!THE MEXICANS ARE COMING!!!!!

THEY'LL BE HERE IN 2 MONTHS.

Collapse -
On foot? Yeah, right....

In reply to: RE:.a WALL is to SLOW DOWN

just like the last one riding on trains, buses, trucks, and cars.....very few actually walked unless liberal cameras were on them so they could look pathetic.

I wonder if Mexico will beef up their southern border sufficiently to stop 15K of them this time....they say they will.

I wonder also if the Dems will again call it a 'humanitarian' crisis when they arrive at the TJ border and then say it isn't a crisis when Trump says it is. That's what the Dems said about the current batch only a month ago, remember? But when Trump calls it a crisis, it's 'manufactured'.

Collapse -
RE:very few actually walked

In reply to: On foot? Yeah, right....

A "caravan" is only as fast as the slowest person. IF they want to be referred to as a "caravan" they are all in it together, other than that they are just a mob or a group of individuals.

RE:I wonder if Mexico will beef up their southern border

How bout beefing up their NORTHERN border?

As Trump calls for a border wall to keep trouble out, illegal U.S. guns are fuelling violence in Mexico

The violent criminals that U.S. President Donald Trump frequently cites as the justification for a proposed border wall may, in fact, be getting their weapons from his own country.

A lucrative black market of U.S. guns purchased through loopholes in American gun legislation is thriving in Mexico, according to research from the Center for American Progress.

Those guns are fuelling the same violence that many asylum seekers and migrants to the U.S. are fleeing.

Collapse -
"Fast and Furious" ring a bell for you?

In reply to: RE:very few actually walked

THAT was BO...…...doing it DELIBERATELY. Didn't work out so well for a few border agents, did it?

Collapse -
That's Hondurans coming, you blithering idiot!

In reply to: RE:.a WALL is to SLOW DOWN

Sorry. Your turn.

Collapse -
(NT) No ******, so blithering must be OK.

In reply to: That's Hondurans coming, you blithering idiot!

Collapse -
Walls work

In reply to: Jim Acosta...the Ultimate in Stupid

I don't think that anyone is questioning that walls work.

What is the purpose of the Don's wall?

The Don is trying to sell it as border security.

The dems see it as the Don trying to make the righty's happy and fulfill a campaign pledge.

The master deal maker is going to have to offer something sweet to get the dems to pay for that.

Collapse -
You know exactly what the purpose is

In reply to: Walls work

Think of it more as a 'cattle chute' just like ropes directing your path in a bank or movie theatre....they keep you traveling to the point of 'least resistance' with manpower at that opening to actually stop you. Farmers have been using fencing forever to keep their animals from wandering....occasionally a few figure out where the weak spots are and exploit them, but they are usually contained quite well.

Collapse -
Yes

In reply to: You know exactly what the purpose is

I know what the purpose of a wall or fence is.

What I don't know is what is the purpose of the Don's push for a wall.

Righty's and lefty's can disagree with that purpose I'll just put a ??? on it.

Collapse -
His purpose obviously, if you listen,

In reply to: Yes

is to protect the American citizen, which is what Dems were FOR as well as recently as four years ago under BO...….What is the purpose of the Dems push AGAINST it now, do you think?

Collapse -
Dems push against

In reply to: His purpose obviously, if you listen,

Perhaps they think there is a better way.
Perhaps they don't buy in to the spiel of the conman who's driving the bus.
Ask Nancy.

Collapse -
She refuses to answer that question, Bob....

In reply to: Dems push against

She IS being asked and diverts and deflects so no answer ever comes out of her botoxed face.

Collapse -
Perhaps Nancy

In reply to: She refuses to answer that question, Bob....

Understands that no matter what she said the Don won't accept it.

The Don needs that wall to get him out of the box he built.

The Dems are saying nope you can't have a wall just sit there in the box and stew.

Collapse -
More likely

In reply to: Perhaps Nancy

Nancy understands the box SHE's in because of her now rapidly expanding Socialist party putting pressure on her. Because NONE of what she is saying TODAY is what she said only a few years ago under BO and GWB

Collapse -
Yes Nancy has a problem

In reply to: More likely

As long as we keep sending these far left nut cases to congress the leaders will have to adjust.

In 2020 when Schumer controls the senate he will have to adjust.

Collapse -
Pelosi's Latest Problem.

In reply to: Yes Nancy has a problem

Collapse -
RE:next to a steel wall on the border...

In reply to: Jim Acosta...the Ultimate in Stupid

which was next to a 3 ft high chain link fence (a fence a 6 year old could easily climb over)

Collapse -
The geographic border between Mexico and the US

In reply to: Jim Acosta...the Ultimate in Stupid

Collapse -
(NT) By "you", I mean pretty much the whole bunch of you.

In reply to: The geographic border between Mexico and the US

Collapse -
Ouch!!

In reply to: By "you", I mean pretty much the whole bunch of you.

Mass condemnation. Not very friendly today, are we? By "we", I mean "you".

Collapse -
"pretty much" allows anyone to say 'Doesnt apply to me,

In reply to: Ouch!!

of course.'

You're the first. Grin

Aimed only at those who
1) don't see a government by men as being incompetent to direct its own steps, much less the steps of others, and/or
2) can find any reason to continue to trust in such a government. Like, you know, In Man We Trust, or something.

Jer 10:23.
Ps 146:3.

Collapse -
Mass judgment as well

In reply to: "pretty much" allows anyone to say 'Doesnt apply to me,

Messages get lost when we try to re-interpret them over and over until we find something that matches our original thoughts.

Collapse -
(NT) ??? Don't be shy, speak directly. I can take it.

In reply to: Mass judgment as well

Collapse -
The Dems are saying that

In reply to: The geographic border between Mexico and the US

"only six' proven terrorists have been stopped at the border in the last few months....so how many does it take to be taken seriously when we have proven cases that involved only ONE at a time (the nightclub in Florida, the killer and his wife in San Diego, et al) where multiples of ten citizens were killed and many more injured? And how many DIDN'T get caught, do you think? Yep....you still can't handle the truth.

Collapse -
RE:.so how many does it take to be taken seriously

In reply to: The Dems are saying that

"taken seriously enough" to?

How many people have to be shot/killed before GUNS are banned?

More are killed by GUNS owned by Americans, than by GUNS owned by illegals/terrorists.

It's not ONLY the illegals/terrorists...it's the GUNS?

NO ONE in America is allowed to make/possess a bomb....

Priorities?

Post was last edited on January 15, 2019 11:55 AM PST

Collapse -
So how do you plan to get them out of

In reply to: RE:.so how many does it take to be taken seriously

the hands of lawful American citizens? How do you plan to stop ANYONE from MAKING their own out of PLASTIC (completely undetectable at scans and untraceable via serial numbers)? You've got NOTHING to offer as a real solution for your bellyaching.

Nope...NO ONE in America is allowed to make/possess a bomb, but the internet provides instructions that are easily followed, so how do you plan to stop THAT? Even without the internet, that law didn't stop BO's old hippie buddies from building bombs and killing cops and bombing government buildings, and it didn't stop Oklahoma killers.

When bad guys want to kill you, they get real creative....the whole purpose of law enforcement is to SLOW DOWN the onslaught and get creative, too. Everything else that has been tried before hasn't worked effectively....so try something that's been agreed on before but not implemented. Just like with cop body cams.....liberals complained about how many blacks were being killed by cops (a complete lie by the way), so cops wear cameras now to protect THEMSELVES from bullshift charges and they've actually worked in their favor, which backfired on those complaining because you don't hear those public crap shows anymore.

Collapse -
Gay night club in FL. Relevance?

In reply to: The Dems are saying that

San Bernardino [not San Diego] mass murder, true facts:
"Farook was a U.S.-born citizen of Pakistani descent, who worked as a health department employee. Malik was a Pakistani-born lawful permanent resident of the United States."

"According to the FBI's investigation, the perpetrators were 'homegrown violent extremists' inspired by foreign terrorist groups. They were not directed by such groups and were not part of any terrorist cell or network. FBI investigators have said that Farook and Malik had become radicalized over several years prior to the attack, consuming 'poison on the internet' and expressing a commitment to jihadism and martyrdom in private messages to each other. Farook and Malik had traveled to Saudi Arabia in the years before the attack. The couple had amassed a large stockpile of weapons, ammunition, and bomb-making equipment in their home."

So, they were in place legally for years; became radicalized; amassed an armory in their home; exchanged terrorist messages; visited Saudi Arabia. All undetected by CIA, FBI, HS, San Bernardino Police and Sheriff, California Highway Patrol; Boy Scouts; Toni H. with a gun in every room. [Wikipedia. There are better sources of course, but you would disparage them too, so Wikipedia is all you get.]

"how many DIDN'T get caught, do you think?"
Do you mean the California team? My definition of getting caught in this context means BEFORE the fatalities. That's where we're supposed to get the "Security".

Your government. Sleep well.

Popular Forums

icon
Computer Newbies 10,686 discussions
icon
Computer Help 54,365 discussions
icon
Laptops 21,181 discussions
icon
Networking & Wireless 16,313 discussions
icon
Phones 17,137 discussions
icon
Security 31,287 discussions
icon
TVs & Home Theaters 22,101 discussions
icon
Windows 7 8,164 discussions
icon
Windows 10 2,657 discussions

REVIEW

Sublime suburban chariot

High on style and technology, the 2019 Volvo XC90 is an incredibly satisfying everyday crossover.