Java 7 update 11

Would keeping the Java 7 update 11 only on the 64-bit IE9 work as a 2nd browser? -- I currently only use the 32-bit, but I have it on both. Apology in advance if this is a dumb question, but I AM a blonde

Miki

Many are unhappy with IE9 64 bit.. Although it may work exactly as you want, I would make sure that the 64 bit version works for the websites you need it for....PLUS....I would also check to make sure that leaving Java enabled in the 64 bit version actually disables it in the 32 bit IE9. Since there's only one Java control in the "Start-Control Panel" section, enabling it there may cause both IE9 versions to work..

Of course, since you probably have both 32 bit and 64 bit version of Java installed in "Programs and Features", you might try uninstalling the 32 bit version of Java there, which should prevent the use of Java in the 32 bit version of IE9.. Give it a try.

Hope this helps.

Grif

Grif -- You are correct in that I have 32 bit and 64 bit versions installed in Programs and Features.

I have two of the Java 7 update 11 listed in Programs and Features -- one listed as 64-bit. I also show two as disabled in my add-ons. I have two Java Control PaneIs on my HD files -- one in X86 Program files (32-bit) and the other in Program Files. In Start-Control-Panel section, clicking the Java icon brings up one Control Panel. All show as enabled. Evidently, Java is not totally disabled -- possibly disabling through Control Panel (deselect the box marked Enable Java Content in the Browser) will do the trick. The two disabled Java in add-ons are probably result of option I elected during install (from their website).

I tried IE9 64-bit out on a few websites and it seemed O.K. I will also try your suggestion to uninstall 32 bit version to see if things will workout. I was hoping that a simple disabling in add-ons would be the answer since enabling as needed would be so simple.

Thanks a bunch......Miki

Received following email from Norton:
"You are protected against the latest Jave vulnerability.
You may have recently seen some of the extensive news coverage, including statements from the United States Department of Homeland Security, regarding a vulnerability in Java. Java is both a language and a platform to run websites and programs used by many computer users, both on the PC and Mac operating systems. This vulneraility leaves millions of computers open to malware attacks and can lure online traffic to virus-infected websites.
Rest assured, because you have a Norton security software product installed on your computer, you're protected against the Java bug (CVE-2013-0422), as long as you have not disabled the automatic updates feature.
We also recommend that you apply Oracle's recently released security patch and make sure you are running the most updated version of Java."
Learn more about Java Zero-Day vulnerability
http://community.norton.com/t5/Ask-Marian/What-s-All-the-Buzz-About-Java-Fixing-The-Vulnerability/ba-p/892757

Java seems to be a nice fat target for the bad guys.

No anti product will protect you from an undiscovered exploit.

Yes....norton may protect you from the exploit in question but what about tomorrows exploit?

So back to my orig post.......do you "really" need Java?

You're gambling that Norton and Oracle stay ahead of the malware writers.

See the links below which Norton "says" is proof that you won't get infected because they're ahead of the game with IPS signatures...:

http://www.symantec.com/connect/blogs/additional-protection-recent-java-zero-day

http://www.symantec.com/connect/blogs/java-zero-day-dished-cool-exploit-kit

And here's Oracle's assurance blog saying much the same:

https://blogs.oracle.com/security/entry/security_alert_for_cve_2013

So......if you want to be totally secure against Java exploits, you uninstall Java... The second option is to disable Java in the browser of your choice, or possibly uninstall it completely. If you feel safe enough because both your AV company and Java have taken the indicated steps, and maybe you don't visit dicey websites, then you might choose the second option. Obviously, the second option is more risky, but it may be the best one for you, specially if you use a lot of programs/websites that require Java.

Hope this helps.

Grif

Today, Carol posted new vulnerabilities found in Java today...

http://forums.cnet.com/7726-6132_102-5412790.html

Are Norton and Oracle ahead of this today?

Hope this helps.

Grif

I was 99 per cent sure of what your answers to my protection question would be....but thought it a good idea to be sure and to also get your information out there.

I do not visit "dicey" websites, and I have no idea which of my regular websites require Java and how to tell if they do. I have a feeling my bank and credit card sites might require Java. With this in mind, I disabled Java in the X86 folder and it tested on their website as not working. This is the browser I use. That said, when I tested the remaining Java on my 64 bit browser, the Java website said I had an old version of Java and did not recognize my 7 update 11. I might uninstall Java from 64 bit IE9 and reinstall just to see if I can keep a working Java on the 64 bit to use as needed. Although the 32 bit and 64 bit folders on my HD each has its own Control Panel, the Java Control Panel in the Start-Control Panel feature shows as disabled.....so I am thinking both browsers are linked together as far as Java is concerned.

Finally -- with the 32 bit IE9 disabled, I find I have no need for the Java, I will certainly remove from my computer.....or install another browser ie Firefox. QUESTION: Will Firefox install with both 32 and 64 bit, too? (have never used browser other than IE)

Thanks again, gentlemen....Miki

I think the normal release flavor is 32 bit.

There is a 64 bit flavor but you have to go muck around in that developer stuff.

We peons don't go there.

I have tried as many of my websites as possible, including banks, and have not yet found any that required Java except when using Google with a "Doodle" heading, wherein I receive a notice saying, "JavaScript void" and a frozen page.

So....to summarize -- I completely removed Java from my IE9 64 bit and am about to do the same for 32 bit. Java has come full circle.....I first learned of Java on the Cnet virus forum many years ago, and I am now officially removing it via that forum.

You both have been very patient with all my questions.....thank you for the Firefox into.....Miki

...have a question. Every now and then, the "Javascript void" message appears on a website.....since there are no remains of Java on my computer, what is its purpose for being and does it indicate I am missing something important?

My thanks, again.....Miki

Java and java script are two different animals.

As for the jscript void msg.
http://www.tech-faq.com/javascript-void-0.html

Appreciate the info and the Javascript link....miki