I think it was unfair that they paired the Zen Vision:m with the ipod 5g 60gig ($400). Hey, lets just face the facts here, C|net has always and will continue to kiss Apples a*s (a direct result of their bias reviews) and no player will ever out score an ipod no matter how good it is. I thought it was funny how they wouldn't even give the vision:m an editors choice award and knocked the vision:m for scratches but not the 5g ipod. The largest insult was "the vision:m isn't as elegant as the ipod", thats a con? If you want a real reviews I suggest you visit dapreview.net and other "thrid party sites" Don't waste your time here.
I previously posted this in the Digital Music Forum instead of the MP3 Players forum, so here it goes again.
CNet recently reviewed the Zen Vision M and gave it an 8.0/10--certainly nothing to scoff at, but it's lower than the iPod 5g's score of 8.3. I find this strange, since it seems better than the iPod in every aspect except size (and CNet even says they prefer the extra thickness).
What does everybody else think?