57 total posts
(Page 1 of 2)
Sickle Cell Anemia , Jewish get that too though. I think the blacks in Africa are related to the Jews.
those are genetic diseases
I'm looking more at infectious types.
He almost certainly thinks HIV was concocted by the CIA
to attack Africans. I assume he thinks the same of Ebola.
This is a refreshing take on it all
That is like saying that HIV or malaria or TB or
syphilis was invented by whites to get rid of blacks. Most people have died of each of these and hunger than have died of Ebola.
Have you noticed
that both the Asian and Black nurse who contracted Ebola virus from Duncan in Dallas are both recovering? So far that's 100% recovery for Americans who have been infected. So, maybe the reason blacks in Africa are dying in such high numbers is based both on lack of similar care and perhaps on diet. I've read they eat fruit bats which sometimes have this Ebola virus. That would be similar in US to eating raccoons which happen to be rabid. Maybe it's more about what you eat and how often you eat it in Africa in opposition to the usual America diet which wouldn't have such "delicacies" included. In fact, Amber Vinson's recovery, even though she is also black, has been remarkably good. Last I read she seems free of Ebola virus.
That just makes Farakhan and Jesse look that much more foolish claiming Ebola is a race based disease.
You cannot get rabies from eating a rabid animal
as long as it's cooked thoroughly. Heat kills the rabies virus.
You can get it if you don't protect yourself when preparing a rabid animal.
Ebola is turning into a political disease.....
The Republicans are using it to torment the Democrats.
Republicans would rather "over react". Just heard a Republican talking head make that statement on Cavuto.
THE SKY IS FALLING!!!! THE SKY IS FALLING!!!!
Will the incubation period be over before the election?
NO new cases in America before the election?...the Republicans will be eating crow? Do elephants eat crow?
I guess you haven't seen the Dem ad
blaming Republicans for ebola regarding the cuts in spending (sequester, even tho that was an idea from the Dem Pres), even though the CDC and NHI received increases in their budgets.
No I didn't, could you provide a link? Thanks.
The Democrats blamed the Republicans for Ebola?...
The Republicans caused/created/spread Ebola? That's quite a claim.
I did see this claim Republican's Blame Ebola on Obama
I guess everyone is staking a claim.
Cuts in Gov spending? Part of Tea Party platform?
From my link above
The names of the more than two dozen Republicans who poleaxed the CDC budget have been published. And to no surprise the bulk of them are either directly affiliated with or have been in part bankrolled by tea party factions
The CDC and NHI budgets
were cut as part of sequestration (a Dem idea, remember).........however, the part of the budget that concerns infectious diseases was actually INCREASED.
Cuts in government spending has always been a Conservative platform....not just a Tea Party one. The Tea Party just made it far more public than it's been since Newt Gingrich's "Contract With America" pledge (that worked, btw).
RE: cut as part of sequestration (a Dem idea, remember).
A Democrat idea that the Tea Party agreed with?
"Tea Party House Republicans are determined to drive the country over the sequester cliff,
Boehner and Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) have been making similar assertions aimed at blaming the president, although recently some members of their party have been trying a different tack, arguing the sequester is not so bad because its cuts are not that deep.
Whether they agreed
or not has no direct impact on the fact that this Dem President is the one who said it would happen if the committee HE assigned to come up with a budget didn't work.
And, as usual, you have no comment over the fact that the CDC and NHI budget amounts for infectious diseases went UP, IN SPITE of the the sequestration cuts to the rest of their agencies.
I prove you wrong, and you deflect and redirect.......nice try though.
I'll answer the most obvious that you
The budgets for both departments/agencies were cut with sequestration; however, the heads of those departments not only had their own departments for infectious diseases NOT cut, but got INCREASES........basically by either taking money from other departments within their agencies or by direct money that offset the other cuts.
Do you finally GET it or is still over your head?
Well I'm sorry if you're offended that the Dems are meanmouthing the Reps about CDC and Ebola.
If/When the Tea Party gets in power...I hope they get a thicker skin.
MOMMY!!!!!They're pointing at me!!!!!!
when you have nothing to say, you say nothing but include the Tea Party into the nothingness.....because you can't dispute my information.....bye
RE; you can't dispute my information..
I tried to get me to tell me which information you wanted me to dispute
3 posts by you in the last few hours....
1 post(10/23/14 3:24 AM) they RECEIVED INCREASES
Next post, (10/23/14 5:23) they WERE CUT
Next post budget amounts for infectious diseases WENT UP
10/23/14 3:24 AM even though the CDC and NHI received increases in their budgets.
10/23/14 5:23 AM The CDC and NHI budgets were cut as part of sequestration(a Dem idea, remember).
In your next post in the same thread (the post which I am responding to), you claim
10/23/14 9:06 AM over the fact that the CDC and NHI budget amounts for infectious diseases went UP,
They , received increases...they, were cut....they, went up.
Which ONE do you want me to answer to?
You went off on a tangent....and here we are.
Pick one, just one
JP...I've answered you repeatedly
It's not my fault if you can't comprehend the answer given. Actually, you don't have to respond to anything.......
RE: Pick one, just one
IF you're talking to me.....I would...but it wouldn't be the right one.
IF you're talking to Toni...good luck
RE: Whether they agreed or not
is that your way of saying
Do you have any links on this?
Here's one...with Four Pinnoccios from the Post
It wasn't only us...
THEY did it also...but THEY were wrong and WE were right?
Four Pinocchios..2 for each side?
According to your own link
In the specific case of the NIH branch that deals with infectious diseases, funding jumped from $1.8 billion in 2000 to $4.3 billion in 2004 — but funding has been flat since then. Funding in 2014 was again $4.3 billion. So that's effectively a cut over time.
Whatever you believe, Diana.....
the facts are that although agencies were cut due to sequestration, infectious disease departments got their increases....in most cases, more than BO even requested.
From that same link: As for the CDC, you will see (page 46) a similar pattern. The numbers have bounced around $6.5 billion in recent years. (CDC receives both an appropriation from Congress and, since 2010, hundreds of millions of dollars from the Prevention and Public Health Fund established by the Affordable Care Act.) Before 2008, the agency received less than $6 billion a year. In fiscal year 2013, the White House proposed a cut in CDC's funding, but Congress added about $700 million. In 2014, the administration again proposed reducing the budget, but Congress boosted it to $6.9 billion,
(Note, as this Congressional Research Service report documents, CDC also is funded by nearly $4 billion in mandatory fees.
Obamacare is ALSO funding it, even with the WH proposing cuts, Congress added to it in 2013 and then boosted it in 2014, even with the WH again proposing reducing their budget.
So the Republicans have NOT been to blame for Ebola, has it? They haven't cut anything and instead have FUNDED it in SPITE of a WH that didn't want it funded to that extent.
As the address form used by his followers says, "The
Honourable Louis Farrakhan" is about as reliable a source as Rush Limpbough or Bill O'Reilly or Andrew Breitb*+art or any of the Looney Right out there. He doesn't care about truth or accuracy, he cares about stirring up hatred and sucking the credulous into his nefarious web. Now, I have to say, Islam has been very good for drug addicted inmates of correctional facilities, helping them to stay clean on the outside, and giving them hope on the inside.
Back to Speakeasy forum
(Page 1 of 2)