Iraqis Find Graves Thought to Hold Hussein's Victims

in charge ill let you have the last word but thw whole worlds sees saddam for what he was to bad you cant thats your problem you are still in denial that bush was right the usa was right and canadas refusal backfired on them just like france germany and the other so called "free " countries must really eat you up

lol lol do you hear it thats the sound of the iraqis saying ty to the usa.

My last word

well these dead people say diferent.

dead people don't say anything

Their DEAD

They can't talk

but then again your deaf to the truth

imagine if he had said "voices from the grave", would you still disagree?


.

"who cares".........

>>>>I know of no one on this forum who has ever stated that Saddam was anything but a brutal dictator.>>>>

Evidently it was 'ok' to leave Saddam alone doing his killing and torturing....according to all who didn't want the US going there to stop him, as that was ONE of the reasons we went...just not the ONLY reason.

If we hadn't, Saddam would still be in power doing whatever he pleased to his own people and it would have been 'ok' with all of you who opposed it.

Great humanitarians you guys are........

TONI

The humanitarian reasons were so far down this administration's list of reasons that it hardly mattered. There are so many other areas that are more of a humanitarian crisis and more amenable to intervention than Iraq was. That rationalization just does not hold water.

Dan

for humanitarian reasons, knowing most times that there would be a 'war' of some type and people would be killed, we (the USA) have been condemned for it over and over by people like you.....so PUHHHHHHLEEEEZ stop crying this same old tune over and over by trying to state that we 'should' be somewhere other than wherever we might be at the time.

No matter WHAT we do.....go to help or ignore.....we are crucified by people who think like you do, who will continuously find SOME fault in the reasons for the decision made. And 100% of the time, it will like you just did.......compare apples to oranges..."why aren't we somewhere else" just because you have nothing more to say that makes sense.

Your soapbox has crumbled from the rot and your weight.....time to move on to something else to bit.. about, and I'm sure you'll find something.

TONI

military/humanitarian involvement were a bit more consistent you might have an argument. Our Peace Corps efforts are almost universally welcomed.

Dan

you sidestep pretty good
you must think he was a good man as you yet refuse to answer with out critizeing the usa.
shame

Not any sidestepping on my part. Support your accusation accusation if you can, retract it if you cannot.

Those are the two choices, Mark. Any other statement is more of your evasiveness.

Dan

supprised

evading the question, again, Mark.

Dan

your silence says it all.
all of se knows my views on iraq and our president i dont evade it hide it.

and as im not eating crow like some people here in se are and refuse to see that the american people saw some person not gonna mention his name here as i would get accused of being a Kerry basher opps i said it its dans fault se.


and as to you refuseing to answer this ill let it drop we in se see you for what you stand for


and have a great day.

and as you wont answer this with a real answer just your typical sidestep ill consider you as a saddam supporter so i will think of you with utter contemp.
you should go away and think
the president

werent you one to say we had know right to invade? seems you should look im mirror to see who.

your the kind who poo pooed the usa for going in.

"Maybe I just imagined that someone here said something like it, but I can't remember and I don't want to challange my view of reality by going back and looking it up. And if I misstate Dan's positions maybe people will forget my original post."

Thanks,

Dan

You complain bitterly about the USA's actions, but don't recognize that thousands of lives have been saved by our being there. Until you admit to that and until you can accept that going there was actually the right thing to do, even if we had the wrong information ahead of time to do so, you are actually condoning Saddam's actions over the years because you would prefer that we had stayed home and done nothing........and thousands more innocent Iraqi people would be dead by now because Saddam would still be in power. Evidently, THAT is OK with you.

If it's NOT.........it's time to step up to the plate and say so.

TONI

The point is Marks continued attempts to portray someone, anyone since he never supports his statements, as being a supporter of Saddam. He's said it time and again and has never, never, not even once, produced a shred of evidence to justify his accusations.

That is the point.

Dan

weve done says you do support him.
never once have you voiced any views on the good we did only the bad.
so as toni said silence speaks volumes.

Have you no shame?

Dan

Either you have been speaking for Blake or taken lessons from him or have been cloned from him, Dan, as you have become the SE expert at the sidestep and duck/dodge and avoid and twist.

>>>>My statements are not the point here, Toni>>>>

If YOUR statements are not to MAKE a point, why make them at all? If you do NOT condone Saddam's actions against his own people, why can you NOT admit that, even with wrong information at the time, the USA going there actually was a good thing and has saved thousands of lives that would have been lost if Saddam were still in power because we didn't go?

You cannot have it both ways, Dan.......either you still condemn the USA for going and therefore believe it was ok for us to stay home and let Saddam still be in power and killing his people........or you finally agree that no matter why we went, that country is better off because we DID go.

Choose.......

And stop trailing Mark like a dog in heat just to twist every little thing that he says into something else because it is amusing to you to do so.

TONI

Why do you not condemn Mark for his repeated, groundless, and insulting accusations?

Dan

and since you took it as an insult to you where in the 1st thread did i mention your name dan do you have a guilty concirence and if so why is that?

We can move on from there.

Dan

I couldn'r resist it! Reminded me of the kids when they were little!