of his remarks. As you can verify by a cursory search.
His point is rarely if ever "love" for others. His shill is paid to say what she does.
A general question might be "Can a person be held responsible for the irrational behavior of another to this person's words or actions?"
I'd think it would be necessary to determine what is rational and what is not. We know that, if shouting certain warnings in crowded places, people could be injured trying to escape whether the warning shout was legitimate or not. In these circumstances, there's not sufficient time to stop and look around for the threat. Thus, I'd say their quick reaction is not irrational. However, if a person realized the hoax and attacked the one perpetrated it, that would not, IMO, be rational. Now...in the case of these reportedly inert bomb devices, could their making be blamed on the claimed inspiration of another person rather than the maker, himself? How often do we hear someone say, "God made me do it", and how often does that person get off the hook for that alibi? So...what's rational here and what is not?

Chowhound
Comic Vine
GameFAQs
GameSpot
Giant Bomb
TechRepublic