Cameras forum

General discussion

Image size vs. image quality

by 1reddogg101 / April 8, 2006 10:24 AM PDT

I have a new canon s80. which i really love. I am going on a trip this summer and i would like to know more about image size vs. quality...so if i wanted the highest quality pictures i will select large and superfine...but say i need a little more efficiency out of my card, what are the advantages and disadvantages to 'superine and medium' vs. 'fine and large'....i probably wont be blowing any picture up bigger than an 8x10 ever....thanks for the advice!!

m

Discussion is locked
You are posting a reply to: Image size vs. image quality
The posting of advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks is prohibited. Please refer to our CNET Forums policies for details. All submitted content is subject to our Terms of Use.
Track this discussion and email me when there are updates

If you're asking for technical help, please be sure to include all your system info, including operating system, model number, and any other specifics related to the problem. Also please exercise your best judgment when posting in the forums--revealing personal information such as your e-mail address, telephone number, and address is not recommended.

You are reporting the following post: Image size vs. image quality
This post has been flagged and will be reviewed by our staff. Thank you for helping us maintain CNET's great community.
Sorry, there was a problem flagging this post. Please try again now or at a later time.
If you believe this post is offensive or violates the CNET Forums' Usage policies, you can report it below (this will not automatically remove the post). Once reported, our moderators will be notified and the post will be reviewed.
Collapse -
Image
by snapshot2 Forum moderator / April 8, 2006 12:29 PM PDT

Your camera has three .jpg compression settings.
Superfine, Fine, Normal

If you need to get more photos on a card, you can set the .jpg quality setting to Fine.

In most photos, you will be unable to tell any difference between superfine and fine.

If you need to get even more on a card, then also set the size to 2592 x 1944 (5 megapixel).

...........

I suggest you take three identical photos,
one set to superfine, one set to fine and one set to normal. See you if can tell any difference.

A photo that includes lots of surfaces, such as near-by grass and tree leaves would be best for the test.

...
..
.

Collapse -
image vs quality
by soupysweetie / April 9, 2006 3:30 AM PDT
In reply to: Image

The real question you have to ask yourself is: do I intend to crop and then expand any pictures you take. If, for example, you take a picture of a tree and in the tree there is a squirrel: you want to blow up the picture to enlarge the squirrel and then print the result as a large picture--this is when you need the most data you can get.

My suggestion is store the image at superfine and largest image size that you can for your camera. If you can't store the number of pictures you want on your memory card, get a 2nd larger card: cheapest investment you can make.

Collapse -
So???
by 1reddogg101 / April 9, 2006 4:25 AM PDT
In reply to: image vs quality

so what gives me more data, quality of size???

Collapse -
my best suggestion is ....
by OneIJack / April 12, 2006 11:09 AM PDT
In reply to: So???

spend a few bucks on a external drive with multi-card reader. that way, take as many pictures at the highest settings as you want, slip out the memory card, plug it into the reader, download it all, clear the card and keep shooting! You can probably pickup a a drive around 20gb for around $100 or less. I have a Wolverine 80gb and it's roughly the size of a PDA but thicker. I paid about $290 for it and it was the best piece of digital camera accessory i have ever bought. It reads 7 different cards and it downloads pretty quickly. A 1gb memory cards takes less than 3 minutes to download.

This way, you have all pictures in the highest setting and you won't have to compromise.

Collapse -
So???
by taboma / April 13, 2006 3:00 PM PDT
In reply to: So???

Set your digital camera at Large and Superfine. That will give you the best results. Just make sure you have a 1 Gig SD card.

I liked our Mods idea for photographing a tree in the forest sort of idea. Joe's idea is a good one.

While on vacation in Turkey last November, I set my camera (Canon SD500) to large and fine since I only wanted to have photographs of my trip.
Check out one of them here. One of the seven wonders of the world. Hagia Sophia in Istanbul:
http://img142.imageshack.us/img142/2244/hagiasophiamorning38vq.jpg

Image quality is good. Not for National Geographic, however.
If I wanted something better I would have used a tripod and set the camera to large and to superfine.

-Kevin

Popular Forums
icon
Computer Newbies 10,686 discussions
icon
Computer Help 54,365 discussions
icon
Laptops 21,181 discussions
icon
Networking & Wireless 16,313 discussions
icon
Phones 17,137 discussions
icon
Security 31,287 discussions
icon
TVs & Home Theaters 22,101 discussions
icon
Windows 7 8,164 discussions
icon
Windows 10 2,657 discussions

FALL TV PREMIERES

Your favorite shows are back!

Don’t miss your dramas, sitcoms and reality shows. Find out when and where they’re airing!